Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 18.9519 LT Hour= 0.9519 CosCHI=-.7918 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 24 STARTT=1264359427 UT_dDAY= 24.78967 LT_sDAY= 23.78967 FILNM = [TK01241857] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-01-24 1857UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 24.78967 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/01/24 begin at 19:01:15.9 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 8427 4792 732 0 0 2926 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 24.78967 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 4792 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 103 15; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.955 DSND organized 4574 total echoes, or 95.5%; in 15 traces; of which DSND selected 4574 useful echoes, or 95.5%; in 15 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 9 108 1985 3386 0.00 0.00 2.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 673 16 80 109 -30 117 44 4 58 100 0 0 108 14 0 0 8 305 1376 4713 0.00 0.00 -3.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -322 6 -6 26 8 55 58 6 0 7 0 0 67 17 0 0 14 64 4389 4715 0.00 0.00 -4.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -467 18 -44 66 47 144 54 3 -1 5 0 0 85 16 0 0 13 143 3702 4706 0.00 0.00 -4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -380 17 -34 57 -28 91 57 5 -2 10 0 0 76 16 0 0 12 37 3003 3984 0.00 0.00 -3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -326 11 23 45 -35 93 54 3 -2 12 0 0 103 15 0 0 11 77 2637 3832 0.00 0.00 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 526 21 -18 36 -9 73 47 3 60 101 0 0 107 15 0 0 10 184 2060 3815 0.00 0.00 3.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 447 18 -79 48 -24 71 51 3 11 137 0 0 86 15 0 0 1 906 1 3797 0.00 0.00 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 276 5 -35 34 -9 38 55 6 5 7 0 0 40 18 0 0 2 597 29 3730 0.00 0.00 2.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 550 10 -66 87 -5 64 46 4 24 67 0 0 62 16 0 0 7 403 1297 4486 0.00 0.00 -3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -581 11 -84 91 -22 67 49 4 3 9 0 0 85 15 0 0 6 27 1016 3236 0.00 0.00 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 445 15 34 73 -228 85 43 3 21 6 0 0 142 13 0 0 5 708 888 4623 0.00 0.00 -3.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -284 4 -48 39 -15 35 58 7 3 5 0 0 52 16 0 0 4 364 489 3816 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 354 10 32 45 -101 84 51 6 0 9 0 0 83 15 0 0 3 582 65 4056 0.00 0.00 2.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 321 9 2 53 24 68 51 6 -1 42 0 0 66 16 0 0 15 69 4406 4714 0.00 0.00 -4.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -534 25 -55 86 32 60 49 3 0 7 0 0 87 15 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.5380 3.2818 233.40 355.78 28.4856-93.3497 2 1.6728 3.3948 475.93 624.05 56.7684142.1036 3 1.7184 3.3909 277.38 397.44122.8349148.3603 4 2.1108 3.3709 308.05 425.50 62.7809 56.0537 5 -2.3141 -4.0830 -257.02 -350.43-13.0245110.4137 6 2.6873 2.9663 430.20 459.26-21.0618-19.5584 7 -2.6488 -4.0566 -519.04 -712.27 28.1824125.1121 8 -2.7852 -4.2089 -296.05 -389.78 13.8180248.1421 9 2.8968 3.0846 650.43 716.48******** 33.9714 10 3.0481 3.4446 431.90 459.76-37.3548******** 11 3.1450 3.4232 519.23 526.76-83.3229 3.7547 12 -3.3270 -3.5323 -326.76 -324.22-18.9553 12.0984 13 -3.7448 -4.2211 -370.07 -419.24 26.2236590.5693 14 -4.0762 -4.2453 -463.57 -464.47********-83.9380 15 -4.0749 -4.2392 -549.73 -506.89**************** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -6 10 3236 3815 2.97 3.05 459.3 431.9 -20 -37 27 184 -5 12 4623 3984 -4.08 -3.33-350.4-326.8 110 -19 708 37 -14 15 4715 4714 -4.25 -4.07-464.5-549.7 -84 -402 64 69 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 15 12 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.65 0.92 0.90 0.67 0 0 0.11 0.34 0.08 0 0 0 2 0.93 0.64 0.97 0.73 0 0 0.11 0.41 0.15 0 0 0 3 0.93 1.00 0.62 0.75 0 0 0.11 0.42 0.15 0 0 0 4 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.47 0 0 0.15 0.54 0.18 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.52 0.90 0 0 0 0.63 0.22 0 6 0 0 0 0 0.89 0.53 0 0 0 0.52 0.33 0.09 7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0.07 1.00 0 0 0 0 8 0.79 0.93 0.93 0.90 0 0 0.25 0.28 0.37 0 0 0 9 0.49 0.90 0.88 0.81 0 0 0 1.00 0.10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0.73 0.61 0 0 0 0.45 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0.65 0.97 0 0 0 0 0.18 0.30 12 0 0 0 0 0 0.81 0 0 0 0 0.89 0.06 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 4574.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.20 0.59 0.53 0.59 0 0 0.56 0.63 0.44 0 0 0 2 0.41 0.13 0.45 0.50 0 0 0.31 0.58 0.15 0 0 0 3 0.47 0.55 0.13 0.54 0 0 0.50 0.63 0.55 0 0 0 4 0.41 0.50 0.46 0.08 0 0 0.51 0.64 0.57 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.09 0.61 0 0 0 0.36 0.64 0 6 0 0 0 0 0.39 0.07 0 0 0 0.27 0.62 0 7 0.44 0.69 0.50 0.49 0 0 0.02 0.61 0 0 0 0 8 0.37 0.42 0.37 0.36 0 0 0.39 0.05 0.59 0 0 0 9 0.56 0.85 0.45 0.43 0 0 0 0.41 0.02 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0.64 0.73 0 0 0 0.16 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0.36 0.38 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 5 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 6 5 0 12 7 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 276.095 549.575 0.005 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 906 1.5 3.3 276.1 2 597 1.7 3.4 549.6 14.0 270.0 518.4 1.000 -200 -2 19 -2 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 2 597 1.7 3.4 549.6 7 108 2.9 3.1 672.7 -112 2 Prox 2 597 1.7 3.4 549.6 8 211 2.7 3.4 446.2 -111 2 Prox 2 597 1.7 3.4 549.6 9 77 3.1 3.4 525.9 -112 2 2 6 5 322.451 580.837 0.105 2 6 12 322.451 492.005 0.269 2 10 5 272.693 580.837 0.063 A12M 10 745 -2.3 -3.5-272.7 5 403 -2.6 -4.1-580.8 16.0 247.3 487.4 0.011 -200 -2 12 -5 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 5 403 -2.6 -4.1-580.8 12 133 -4.1 -4.2-492.0 -111 2 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 906 1.5 3.3 276.1 6 305 -2.8 -4.2-322.5 2.231 0.23 -0.89 0.82223.45 32 1 Aiojx 1 1.5 286.1 6 3.5-319.3 2.231 0.23 -0.89 0.82223.45 32 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 6] TOz,o,x= 0.00 670.34 670.34 AZOXx: [x 6o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 670.34 670.34 Qiojx 1 906 1.5 3.3 276.1 10 745 -2.3 -3.5-272.7 2.214 0.23 -0.93 1.63-58.64 26 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -58.639 1 o 10 x 1.538 2.613 6 x 7 1.8 3.3 0.0 670.3 670.3 3 Qiojx 1 906 1.5 3.3 276.1 11 143 -3.7 -4.2-380.4 1.355 0.23 -0.83 0.05 97.35 13 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 97.350 1 o 11 x 2.835 3.282 6 x 7 1.8 3.3 0.0 670.3 670.3 3 Qiojx 3 582 1.7 3.4 321.2 6 305 -2.8 -4.2-322.5 2.072 0.34 -0.98 2.53-81.63 34 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -81.633 6 x 3 o 1.818 3.314 1 o 7 1.5 3.3 0.0 670.3 670.3 2 Qiojx 3 582 1.7 3.4 321.2 10 745 -2.3 -3.5-272.7 1.654 0.34 -1.03 2.69-42.21 22 3 Qiojx 3 582 1.7 3.4 321.2 11 143 -3.7 -4.2-380.4 1.355 0.34 -0.89 0.18 86.06 14 3 Aiojx 3 2.5 348.8 11 3.4-390.6 1.355 0.34 -0.89 0.18 86.06 14 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x11] TOz,o,x= 0.00 258.17 258.17 AZOXx: [x11o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 258.17 258.17 Qiojx 4 364 2.1 3.4 354.0 6 305 -2.8 -4.2-322.5 1.707 0.02 -1.08 2.57-99.23 27 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -99.227 6 x 4 o 2.111 3.314 1 o 7 1.5 3.3 0.0 670.3 670.3 2 Qiojx 4 364 2.1 3.4 354.0 10 745 -2.3 -3.5-272.7 1.363 0.02 -1.13 4.30-43.53 14 4 Qiojx 4 364 2.1 3.4 354.0 11 143 -3.7 -4.2-380.4 1.355 0.02 -0.98 1.17-34.17 14 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -34.175 11 x 4 o 2.835 3.327 3 o 7 1.7 3.4 0.0 258.2 258.2 2 Qiojz 1 906 1.5 3.3 276.1 4 364 2.1 3.4 354.0 1.284 0.23 -0.02 0.99 0.08 25.98 12 4 Aiojz 1 2.7 328.9 4 3.5 323.9 1.284 0.23 -0.02 0.99 0.08 25.98 12 -4 AZOXo: [o 1x 6z 4] TOz,o,x= 25.98 696.32 670.34 AZOXz: [z 4o 1] TOz,o,x= 25.98 25.98 0.00 Qiojz 3 582 1.7 3.4 321.2 4 364 2.1 3.4 354.0 1.383 0.34 -0.02 0.91 1.50 37.42 14 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 37.417 4 z 3 o 2.798 3.391 1 o 7 1.5 3.3 26.0 696.3 670.3 1 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 4 4 [z 4o 1] Tzox= 25.98 25.98 0.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 4 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 1 7 [o 1x 6z 4] Tzox= 0.00 696.32 670.34 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 1 7 [o 1x 6 ] Tzox= 0.00 696.32 670.34 Aiojz 3 2.7 360.1 4 3.7 326.9 1.383 0.34 -0.02 0.91 1.50 37.42 14 -4 AZOXo: [o 3x11z 4] TOz,o,x= 37.42 295.59 258.17 AZOXz: [z 4o 3] TOz,o,x= 37.42 37.42 0.00 JNXZ iz ITz FSTz FETz RTRz jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxz YRTz RD Qzx TO NB i/j Qizjx 4 364 2.1 3.4 354.0 6 305 -2.8 -4.2-322.5 1.276 -0.02 -0.91 0.74-78.78 13 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -78.781 4 o 4 o 2.111 3.371 3 o 7 1.7 3.4 37.4 37.4 0.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -78.781 4 o 4 x 2.111 3.371 3 o 7 1.7 3.4 37.4 37.4 0.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -78.781 6 x 4 o 2.111 3.314 1 o 7 1.5 3.3 0.0 696.3 670.3 2 Qizjx 4 364 2.1 3.4 354.0 10 745 -2.3 -3.5-272.7 1.018 -0.02 -0.98 2.60 -4.10 2 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -4.101 4 o 4 o 2.111 3.371 3 o 7 1.7 3.4 37.4 37.4 0.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -4.101 4 o 4 x 2.111 3.371 3 o 7 1.7 3.4 37.4 37.4 0.0 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 6 2 3 o 3x11z 4 4 z 4o 3 5 6 x 6o 1 7 8 9 10 11 x11o 3 12 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 696.3 670.3 3 37.4 295.6 258.2 4 37.4 37.4 0.0 6 0.0 670.3 670.3 11 0.0 258.2 258.2 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 3.475 4 3.475 1 -4.345 6 0.189 0.006 0.155 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 3.5 -4.3 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 1 32 3.48 0 2.87 4.20 Admit k 8 1 1 32 3.28 0 Add k 8 1 1 -32 0 276.1 325.7 93 23 Admit k 8 1 3 0 3.39 0 Add k 8 1 3 0 0 321.2 365.0 73 43 Admit k 8 1 4 0 3.37 0 Add k 8 1 4 0 0 354.0 398.6 103 84 Result j 8 1 32 84 9 3.10 84 jj OK j 9 6 32 4.34 19 3.59 5.26 Admit k 9 6 6 32 -4.21 19 Add k 9 6 6 -32 19-322.5-348.9 51 11 Admit k 9 6 11 0 -4.22 19 Add k 9 6 11 0 19-380.4-401.0 53 32 Result j 9 6 32 44 15 3.42 114 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 24.78967 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 3.133 0.0981 3.933 0.1009 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.475 -4.345 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.54 233.40 359.0 32 0 2 3 1.72 277.38 476.7 0 0 3 10 -2.31 -257.02 594.8 0 0 4 4 2.11 308.05 650.2 0 0 5 2 1.67 475.93 796.1 0 -200 6 6 -2.79 -296.05 824.5 32 0 7 8 2.69 430.20 1156.1 0 -111 8 5 -2.65 -519.04 1374.8 0 -200 9 11 -3.74 -370.07 1385.8 0 0 10 9 3.15 519.23 1633.0 0 -112 11 7 2.90 650.43 1884.2 0 -112 12 12 -4.08 -463.57 1889.6 0 -111 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 1x 6] JQ, k, M, C = 1 4 1o JQ, k, M, C = 1 7 6x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.5380 1.000E+00 2 3 1.7184 1.126E-01 3 6 1.8176 2.970E-01 4 10 1.2864 5.210E-05 5 11 2.8347 3.799E-05 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 10 1.2864 5.210E-05 2 1 1.5380 1.000E+00 3 3 1.7184 1.126E-01 4 6 1.8176 2.970E-01 5 11 2.8347 3.799E-05 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -10 1.2864 2.6132 5.210E-05 0 0 2 1 1.5380 3.2818 1.000E+00 64 0 3 3 1.7184 3.3909 1.126E-01 0 0 4 -6 1.8176 3.3143 2.970E-01 63 0 5 -11 2.8347 3.3268 3.799E-05 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 10 5.210E-05 j 2 1 1.000E+00 M 2 6 x j 3 3 1.126E-01 M 3 11 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 3 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 4 IGj: 19 19 2 SrtFS 1.54 1.72 2.11 SrtFE 3.28 3.39 3.37 MANy= 64 62 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 ITRy= 906 582 364 XYTy= 36.0 24.3 105.5 RTRy= 276.1 321.2 354.0 BWjj=0.64560.61920.4665 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 3 MAN= 64 62 FST= 1.54 1.72 FET= 3.28 3.39 RST= 233.4 277.4 RET= 355.8 397.4 RTR= 276.1 321.2 XYT= 36.0 24.3 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 0.9519 -0.7918 1.2082 159.98 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 47 1 19 1 1 3.12 1.54 3.28 225.1 332.8 3.13 0.00 3.13 48 3 19 2 2 3.15 1.72 3.39 272.2 428.7 3.13 0.00 3.13 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.3529 3.1483 3 3.1483 3.1332 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-01-24 1857UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 24.78967 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=160.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 3.227 (±0.132) MHz, Height 263.4 (± 6.7) km. ScaleHt 27.9 (± 8.6) km SlabT 43.8 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 0.6164 25.0257 56.4486 83.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 3.4753 4.3450 0.0000 0.0000 3.1332 3.9328 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 3.1332 255.8764 23.2 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 3.8665 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 1069.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.4044 217.8806 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 198.9379 1.7085 -19.6 15.4 -36.0 7.2 -2.0 59.3 0.637 -35.2 18.3 7.4 56.8 9 211.5442 2.1035 -2.5 15.2 -26.3 4.4 2.3 47.6 0.587 -24.8 14.1 9.0 45.6 52 224.9492 2.5288 1.1 20.9 -19.7 3.8 1.5 39.4 0.575 -18.7 12.0 6.5 37.7 87 239.2037 2.9201 6.2 21.4 -18.5 2.9 0.7 30.4 0.605 -17.6 9.3 5.5 29.1 122 254.3616 3.1293 7.0 20.9 -17.6 2.7 0.4 28.7 0.610 -16.9 8.7 5.0 27.5 138 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 24.78967 0.000 0.00 0.00 3.133 255.88 23.17 0.553 0.796 1.349 1.439 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 4792 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 24.78967 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 24.78967 998 -5.2 21.2 -33.8 3.3 -0.6 26.8 60.3 -32.8 8.9 8.2 25.5 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00003 0.00025 0.00069 0.00135 0.19374 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00011 0.00096 0.00267 0.00523 0.28164 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00002 0.00015 0.00041 0.00079 0.19089 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 6 4 0.00005 0.00042 0.00118 0.00231 0.10724 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 10 4 0.00013 0.00114 0.00315 0.00618 0.05939 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 11 4 0.00009 0.00081 0.00224 0.00439 0.08624 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 11 DSND organized 4574 total echoes, or 95.5%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 3045 useful echoes, or 63.5%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 906 1 3797 1.54 3.28 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 233 356 276 5 -35 34 -9 38 55 6 5 7 28 -93 40 18 64 0 3 582 65 4056 1.72 3.39 2.59 1.87 3.14 0.00 277 397 321 9 2 53 24 68 51 6 -1 42 123 148 66 16 62 0 10 745 888 3984 -2.31 -3.53 -3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 -257 -324 -273 7 -33 39 -27 44 57 7 4 6 -13 12 54 16 62 0 4 364 489 3816 2.11 3.37 2.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 308 425 354 10 32 45 -101 84 51 6 0 9 63 56 83 15 0 0 6 305 1376 4713 -2.79 -4.21 -3.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 -296 -390 -322 6 -6 26 8 55 58 6 0 7 14 248 67 17 63 0 11 143 3702 4706 -3.74 -4.22 -4.01 0.00 -3.79 0.00 -370 -419 -380 18 -34 54 -28 84 57 5 -2 9 26 591 76 16 62 0 POL rejected 6 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 597 29 3730 1.67 3.39 2.44 0.00 2.97 0.00 476 624 550 10 -66 87 -5 64 46 4 24 67 57 142 62 16 -200 0 8 211 1016 3815 2.69 3.44 3.21 0.00 3.37 0.00 430 460 446 15 19 79 -149 79 50 4 12 30 -21 -209 92 15 -111 0 5 403 1297 4486 -2.65 -4.06 -3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 -519 -712 -581 11 -84 91 -22 67 49 4 3 9 28 125 85 15 -200 0 9 77 2637 3832 3.15 3.42 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 519 527 526 21 -18 36 -9 73 47 3 60 101 -83 4 107 15 -112 0 7 108 1985 3386 2.90 3.08 2.98 3.21 0.00 0.00 650 716 673 16 80 109 -30 117 44 4 58 100 -171 34 108 14 -112 0 12 133 4389 4714 -4.08 -4.24 -4.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 -464 -507 -492 32 -48 68 14 133 51 4 0 6 -364 -128 86 15 -111 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-01-24 1857UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 24.78967 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/01/24 at 19:05:09.7; *********************** MMAX= 4792: DSND normal termination