Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 15.9519 LT Hour= 21.9519 CosCHI=-.6500 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 33 STARTT=1265126227 UT_dDAY= 33.66467 LT_sDAY= 33.66467 FILNM = [TK02021557] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1557UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.66467 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/02/02 begin at 16:01:34.6 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 6797 3958 649 0 0 2084 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 33.66467 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3958 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 84 15; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.964 DSND organized 3815 total echoes, or 96.4%; in 15 traces; of which DSND selected 3815 useful echoes, or 96.4%; in 15 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 9 211 1464 2538 0.00 0.00 2.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 609 26 59 78 27 99 43 3 11 9 0 0 79 13 0 0 8 155 1408 2540 0.00 0.00 2.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 529 18 -10 67 67 79 42 3 5 10 0 0 80 14 0 0 14 71 3523 3873 0.00 0.00 -3.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -488 12 -51 59 14 93 50 5 5 8 0 0 89 16 0 0 13 97 3472 3863 0.00 0.00 -3.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -445 15 -78 63 -7 45 53 5 7 6 0 0 72 15 0 0 12 74 3061 3767 0.00 0.00 -3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -326 10 -28 42 -151 62 52 4 9 5 0 0 91 15 0 0 11 167 3006 3708 0.00 0.00 -3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -672 12 -107 118 -30 75 46 3 8 8 0 0 85 15 0 0 10 63 1855 3132 0.00 0.00 -2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -332 9 6 80 165 71 44 2 -8 7 0 0 114 13 0 0 1 661 3 2539 0.00 0.00 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 593 11 -95 98 -89 93 43 4 70 9 0 0 75 15 0 0 2 495 7 2534 0.00 0.00 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 297 8 -52 62 -25 60 52 6 0 6 0 0 52 17 0 0 7 191 1324 2544 0.00 0.00 2.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 467 20 3 30 50 77 44 3 3 6 0 0 74 14 0 0 6 212 1286 3805 0.00 0.00 -2.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -610 8 -78 85 -173 92 45 3 11 7 0 0 96 14 0 0 5 167 1251 2557 0.00 0.00 2.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 422 16 -2 30 7 46 46 3 0 5 0 0 62 15 0 0 4 766 623 3857 0.00 0.00 -2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -309 8 -34 50 -14 59 54 7 2 6 0 0 52 16 0 0 3 410 387 2623 0.00 0.00 2.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 345 13 -63 51 0 72 49 5 3 6 0 0 52 17 0 0 15 75 3526 3868 0.00 0.00 -3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -537 22 -66 75 8 83 47 4 8 12 0 0 106 14 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6369 2.5436 526.62 687.28 7.9181******** 2 1.6299 2.5098 263.55 377.60 62.0140 36.1860 3 2.1110 2.5534 311.60 430.68 22.1784306.1918 4 -2.2267 -3.3572 -289.08 -414.42********227.7887 5 2.3970 2.5517 408.92 475.44********434.0884 6 -2.5505 -3.1614 -576.63 -634.00 81.4177-57.1078 7 2.4075 2.5507 449.01 520.07580.6019******** 8 2.4197 2.5460 507.85 591.62********251.3393 9 2.4307 2.5423 607.60 650.65**************** 10 -2.5020 -2.7707 -334.55 -329.36 31.8280 45.6989 11 -2.9973 -3.2680 -636.18 -746.98106.0511******** 12 -3.1143 -3.2968 -325.70 -365.54132.9445369.3959 13 -3.2673 -3.3797 -441.34 -446.31******** 26.0586 14 -3.2833 -3.3961 -485.90 -497.87609.7586-13.5261 15 -3.2806 -3.3724 -534.25 -539.07827.5804288.8019 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -5 7 2557 2544 2.55 2.41 475.4 449.0 434 581 167 191 -4 10 3857 3132 -3.36 -2.50-414.4-334.6 228 32 766 63 -6 11 3805 3708 -3.16 -3.00-634.0-636.2 -57 106 212 167 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 15 12 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.51 0.96 0.48 0.16 0.14 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.99 0.50 0.45 0.13 0.10 0.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.98 0.90 0.25 0.35 0.29 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.95 0.73 1.00 0.09 0.82 0.73 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.98 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.31 0.40 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.31 0.41 0.21 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.84 0.10 0.16 0.07 0.09 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.26 0.06 0.86 0.82 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0.85 0.06 0.79 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.18 1.00 0.97 0.05 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3815.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.17 0.47 0.50 0.15 0.20 0.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.53 0.13 0.38 0.10 0.14 0.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.50 0.62 0.11 0.15 0.25 0.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.85 0.90 0.85 0.09 0.33 0.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.80 0.86 0.75 0.67 0.04 0.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.85 0.90 0.81 0.73 0.81 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.22 0.59 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.41 0.10 0.73 0.26 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.27 0.02 0.22 0.25 0.23 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.74 0.78 0.03 0.61 0.59 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0.39 0.02 0.45 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.77 0.41 0.55 0.02 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 8 9 0 5 13 0 6 6 14 0 7 0 8 0 9 8 0 10 5 0 6 11 9 0 8 12 10 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 2 1 297.228 593.035 0.002 2 2 5 297.228 528.512 0.117 2 2 6 297.228 609.289 0.025 2 3 1 345.311 593.035 0.152 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 3 410 2.1 2.6 345.3 1 661 1.6 2.5 593.0 1.5 344.8 606.9 0.474 -200 -2 6 -1 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 1 661 1.6 2.5 593.0 5 155 2.4 2.5 528.5 -111 2 Prox 1 661 1.6 2.5 593.0 6 211 2.4 2.5 609.3 -112 2 2 7 8 297.203 618.097 0.039 A12M 7 829 -2.2 -2.8-297.2 8 379 -2.6 -3.3-618.1 10.0 283.8 558.1 0.038 -200 -2 7 -8 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 8 379 -2.6 -3.3-618.1 11 71 -3.3 -3.4-487.9 -113 2 Prox 8 379 -2.6 -3.3-618.1 12 75 -3.3 -3.4-537.2 -113 2 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 2 495 1.6 2.5 297.2 7 829 -2.2 -2.8-297.2 1.306 0.18 -0.90 1.32 0.00 10 2 Qiojx 2 495 1.6 2.5 297.2 9 74 -3.1 -3.3-326.4 1.180 0.18 -0.93 1.25-14.55 7 2 Qiojx 2 495 1.6 2.5 297.2 10 97 -3.3 -3.4-445.3 1.067 0.18 -0.80 0.11 7.00 4 2 Aiojx 2 2.3 356.1 10 2.5-444.8 1.067 0.18 -0.80 0.11 7.00 4 -2 AZOXo: [o 2x10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 21.00 21.00 AZOXx: [x10o 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 21.00 21.00 Qiojx 3 410 2.1 2.6 345.3 7 829 -2.2 -2.8-297.2 1.024 0.26 -0.96 2.03 -0.50 1 3 Qiojx 3 410 2.1 2.6 345.3 9 74 -3.1 -3.3-326.4 1.180 0.26 -0.99 2.50 -5.29 7 3 Qiojx 3 410 2.1 2.6 345.3 10 97 -3.3 -3.4-445.3 1.067 0.26 -0.87 1.34 12.00 4 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 12.000 10 x 3 o 2.335 2.453 2 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 21.0 21.0 2 Qiojx 4 358 2.4 2.6 435.4 9 74 -3.1 -3.3-326.4 1.012 0.32 -1.17 4.81 -0.50 1 4 Qiojx 4 358 2.4 2.6 435.4 10 97 -3.3 -3.4-445.3 1.041 0.32 -1.02 2.99 -0.71 2 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -0.707 10 x 4 o 2.397 2.453 2 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 21.0 21.0 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 o 2x10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x10o 2 11 12 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 2 0.0 21.0 21.0 10 0.0 21.0 21.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.567 2 -3.407 10 9.000 0.034 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.6 -3.4 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 2 32 2.57 0 2.12 3.11 Admit k 8 2 2 32 2.51 0 Add k 8 2 2 -32 0 297.2 328.1 69 15 Admit k 8 2 3 0 2.55 0 Add k 8 2 3 0 0 345.3 367.9 216 121 Admit k 8 2 4 0 2.55 0 Add k 8 2 4 0 0 435.4 466.2 252 307 Result j 8 2 32 381 9 2.38 306 jj OK j 9 10 32 3.41 19 2.82 4.12 Admit k 9 10 9 0 -3.30 19 Add k 9 10 9 0 19-326.4-344.9 16 0 Admit k 9 10 10 32 -3.38 19 Add k 9 10 10 -32 19-445.3-443.8 48 24 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 33.66467 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.440 0.0607 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.567 -3.407 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 2 1.63 263.55 429.6 32 0 2 7 -2.23 -289.08 643.7 0 0 3 3 2.11 311.60 657.8 0 0 4 1 1.64 526.62 862.0 0 -200 5 4 2.40 408.92 980.2 0 0 6 9 -3.11 -325.70 1014.3 0 0 7 5 2.42 507.85 1228.8 0 -111 8 10 -3.27 -441.34 1442.0 32 0 9 8 -2.55 -576.63 1470.7 0 -200 10 6 2.43 607.60 1476.9 0 -112 11 11 -3.28 -485.90 1595.4 0 -113 12 12 -3.28 -534.25 1752.7 0 -113 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 2x10] JQ, k, M, C = 2 4 2o JQ, k, M, C = 2 7 10x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 2 1.6299 1.000E+00 2 3 2.1110 9.598E-02 3 4 2.3970 1.346E-02 4 7 1.1822 5.015E-01 5 9 2.1724 2.669E-05 6 10 2.3347 5.534E-03 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 7 1.1822 5.015E-01 2 2 1.6299 1.000E+00 3 3 2.1110 9.598E-02 4 9 2.1724 2.669E-05 5 10 2.3347 5.534E-03 6 4 2.3970 1.346E-02 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -7 1.1822 1.8018 5.015E-01 0 0 2 2 1.6299 2.5098 1.000E+00 64 0 3 3 2.1110 2.5534 9.598E-02 0 0 4 -9 2.1724 2.3658 2.669E-05 0 0 5 -10 2.3347 2.4532 5.534E-03 63 0 6 4 2.3970 2.5507 1.346E-02 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 3 3 9.598E-02 k 6 4 1.346E-02 j 4 9 2.669E-05 k 5 10 5.534E-03 M 4 2 o -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 3 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 2 3 4 IGj: 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.63 2.11 2.40 SrtFE 2.51 2.55 2.55 MANy= 64 62 61 NIXy= 0 0 0 ITRy= 495 410 358 XYTy= 57.2 62.9 28.4 RTRy= 297.2 345.3 435.4 BWjj=0.49820.25050.0870 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 2 3 4 MAN= 64 62 61 FST= 1.63 2.11 2.40 FET= 2.51 2.55 2.55 RST= 263.6 311.6 408.9 RET= 377.6 430.7 520.1 RTR= 297.2 345.3 435.4 XYT= 57.2 62.9 28.4 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 21.9519 -0.6500 0.6500 160.44 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 28 2 19 1 1 2.42 1.63 2.51 262.1 400.9 2.44 0.00 2.44 29 3 19 2 2 2.44 2.11 2.55 306.8 443.0 2.44 0.00 2.44 30 4 19 3 3 2.47 2.40 2.55 432.6 509.6 2.44 0.00 2.44 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 2 1.6123 2.4424 3 2.4424 2.4663 4 2.4663 2.4402 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1557UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.66467 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=160.4 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.487 (±0.038) MHz, Height 265.0 (± 1.9) km. ScaleHt 26.1 (± 3.7) km SlabT 43.0 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 21.6164 33.9007 56.4486 75.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.5675 3.4070 0.0000 0.0000 2.4402 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.4402 275.1971 30.2 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9353 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 297.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.3939 223.2194 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 239.2037 1.8355 3.7 8.6 -29.9 7.3 6.9 52.5 0.671 -27.1 11.4 14.4 51.8 17 254.3616 2.2542 -6.7 21.8 -19.5 5.3 3.8 35.5 0.756 -17.8 11.5 8.7 34.0 55 270.4800 2.4246 -3.8 28.9 -15.6 4.7 4.1 29.7 0.762 -14.0 10.1 8.0 28.4 73 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 33.66467 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.440 275.20 30.24 0.320 0.630 0.949 1.972 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3958 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 33.66467 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 33.66467 998 -16.3 24.3 -22.8 2.9 7.0 14.0 79.6 -20.2 5.4 12.6 13.2 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 2 4 0.00010 0.00093 0.00259 0.00508 0.09339 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 3 4 0.00011 0.00102 0.00284 0.00557 0.07005 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00019 0.00168 0.00466 0.00914 0.09141 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 7 4 0.00019 0.00167 0.00465 0.00911 0.06960 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 9 4 0.00039 0.00351 0.00974 0.01909 0.07178 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 10 4 0.00037 0.00333 0.00924 0.01811 0.06015 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 DSND organized 3815 total echoes, or 96.4%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 2263 useful echoes, or 57.2%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 2 495 7 2534 1.63 2.51 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 264 378 297 8 -52 62 -25 60 52 6 0 6 62 36 52 17 64 0 7 829 623 3132 -2.23 -2.77 -2.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 -289 -329 -297 13 -25 59 -2 77 54 7 0 8 -177 46 55 17 0 0 3 410 387 2623 2.11 2.55 2.36 0.00 2.36 0.00 312 431 345 13 -63 51 0 72 49 5 3 6 22 306 52 17 62 0 4 358 1251 2544 2.40 2.55 2.47 2.42 2.09 0.00 409 520 435 24 4 27 28 50 45 3 0 6 -533 -139 68 15 61 0 9 74 3061 3767 -3.11 -3.30 -3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 -326 -366 -326 8 -28 40 -151 62 52 4 9 6 133 369 91 15 62 0 10 97 3472 3863 -3.27 -3.38 -3.32 -3.29 0.00 0.00 -441 -446 -445 15 -78 63 -7 45 53 5 7 6 -294 26 72 15 63 0 POL rejected 6 multiple- & other traces: NIX 1 661 3 2539 1.64 2.54 2.20 0.00 2.37 0.00 527 687 593 11 -95 98 -89 93 43 4 70 9 8 -554 75 15 -200 0 5 155 1408 2540 2.42 2.55 2.47 0.00 2.43 0.00 508 592 529 18 -10 67 67 79 42 3 5 10 -2458 251 80 14 -111 0 8 379 1286 3708 -2.55 -3.27 -2.97 0.00 -3.37 0.00 -577 -747 -618 10 -79 81 -98 110 45 3 11 8 81 -236 91 14 -200 0 6 211 1464 2538 2.43 2.54 2.48 0.00 2.45 0.00 608 651 609 26 59 78 27 99 43 3 11 9 1252 1119 79 13 -112 0 11 71 3523 3873 -3.28 -3.40 -3.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 -486 -498 -488 12 -51 59 14 93 50 5 5 8 610 -14 89 16 -113 0 12 75 3526 3868 -3.28 -3.37 -3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 -534 -539 -537 22 -66 75 8 83 47 4 8 12 828 289 106 14 -113 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1557UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.66467 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/02/02 at 16:03:43.3; *********************** MMAX= 3958: DSND normal termination