Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 17.9519 LT Hour= 23.9519 CosCHI=-.7620 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 33 STARTT=1265133427 UT_dDAY= 33.74800 LT_sDAY= 33.74800 FILNM = [TK02021757] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1757UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.74800 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/02/02 begin at 18:01:35.6 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5804 3142 556 0 0 2064 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 33.74800 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3142 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 65 15; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.972 DSND organized 3053 total echoes, or 97.2%; in 15 traces; of which DSND selected 3053 useful echoes, or 97.2%; in 15 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 9 153 1201 2732 0.00 0.00 -2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -575 11 -53 60 -26 87 43 3 11 11 0 0 98 13 0 0 8 213 1053 1966 0.00 0.00 2.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 429 14 20 41 -12 55 44 3 1 10 0 0 75 15 0 0 14 50 2783 3032 0.00 0.00 -3.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -508 22 -78 65 51 68 50 5 -1 11 0 0 77 16 0 0 13 85 2707 3062 0.00 0.00 -3.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -439 16 -33 28 -31 76 53 4 3 8 0 0 71 14 0 0 12 64 2532 3086 0.00 0.00 -3.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -323 8 27 28 -153 91 47 4 17 11 0 0 126 13 0 0 11 25 1421 1822 0.00 0.00 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 558 14 -3 16 -1 9 40 3 25 36 0 0 106 14 0 0 10 311 1240 3089 0.00 0.00 -3.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -328 10 -60 46 41 69 52 5 0 8 0 0 71 15 0 0 1 115 9 145 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 250 2 -138 39 -35 14 53 4 -11 5 0 0 51 15 0 0 2 528 44 2107 0.00 0.00 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 321 9 22 65 -44 41 47 5 4 8 0 0 60 16 0 0 7 66 962 1973 0.00 0.00 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 510 16 111 75 145 112 43 3 -16 9 0 0 88 15 0 0 6 79 843 2013 0.00 0.00 2.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 312 9 57 62 -148 114 43 3 10 12 0 0 111 13 0 0 5 818 414 3091 0.00 0.00 -2.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -294 8 -32 39 -44 43 53 6 6 7 0 0 61 16 0 0 4 385 280 2047 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 319 13 -18 50 -78 70 48 5 7 11 0 0 56 17 0 0 3 104 47 1807 0.00 0.00 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 567 10 -84 151 -10 60 40 3 6 14 0 0 93 14 0 0 15 57 2814 3053 0.00 0.00 -3.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -567 23 -54 74 32 41 45 4 -2 11 0 0 95 14 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6228 1.8286 247.57 255.76100.4388 56.0880 2 1.8122 2.5934 262.60 397.13********-12.4363 3 1.9108 2.5229 523.78 631.76138.9116******** 4 2.0322 2.6246 284.21 360.05180.9370-11.7721 5 -2.1651 -3.4308 -267.92 -379.03-27.3757155.7886 6 2.3712 2.5842 299.81 323.14125.4533 66.5374 7 2.4619 2.5545 514.20 485.54********114.9758 8 2.4160 2.5553 407.02 437.86517.1412******** 9 -2.5402 -3.2686 -534.71 -738.12 94.0766******** 10 -2.5358 -3.4223 -286.32 -430.23 40.5757 26.6119 11 2.4977 2.5428 550.03 547.54**************** 12 -3.2369 -3.4216 -318.11 -347.96-90.2401143.9037 13 -3.2985 -3.3803 -428.92 -457.51430.4227******** 14 -3.3336 -3.3656 -506.61 -496.58 81.9273234.7918 15 -3.3444 -3.3883 -559.90 -554.01**************** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -1 2 145 2107 1.83 1.81 255.8 262.6 56 -153 115 528 -5 10 3091 3089 -3.43 -2.54-379.0-286.3 156 41 818 311 -10 13 3089 3062 -3.42 -3.30-430.2-428.9 27 430 1129 85 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 15 12 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.54 0.63 0.58 0.22 0.10 0.14 0 0.05 0 0 0 0 2 1.00 0.34 0.80 0.25 0.10 0.17 0 0.04 0 0 0 0 3 0.95 0.83 0.33 0.36 0.16 0.24 0 0.08 0 0 0 0 4 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.12 0.43 0.65 0 0.21 0 0 0 0 5 1.00 0.66 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0 0.49 0 0 0 0 6 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.08 0 0.32 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.40 0 0.04 1.00 0 0 8 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0.10 0.78 0.17 0.24 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.60 0 0.12 0.68 0.03 0.03 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.66 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.82 0.48 0.02 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3053.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.21 0.78 0.42 0.49 0.59 0.28 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.22 0.03 0.12 0.17 0.09 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.58 0.88 0.13 0.52 0.54 0.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.51 0.83 0.48 0.03 0.50 0.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.41 0.91 0.46 0.50 0.02 0.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.72 0.97 0.81 0.85 0.83 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.05 0 0 0.31 0 0 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.69 0 0 0.40 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 11 6 10 0 7 0 8 7 7 0 9 0 10 0 11 9 0 9 12 8 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 308.932 566.713 0.086 2 1 5 308.932 510.148 0.191 2 1 8 308.932 558.240 0.101 2 3 2 319.300 566.713 0.119 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 3 385 2.0 2.6 319.3 2 104 1.9 2.5 566.7 6.0 289.9 571.1 0.041 -200 -2 6 -2 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 2 104 1.9 2.5 566.7 5 66 2.5 2.6 510.1 -113 2 Prox 2 104 1.9 2.5 566.7 6 213 2.4 2.6 428.5 -113 2 Prox 2 104 1.9 2.5 566.7 8 25 2.5 2.5 558.2 -113 2 2 9 11 323.027 508.190 0.239 2 9 12 323.027 567.123 0.130 2 10 7 294.336 574.699 0.024 A12M 10 1214 -2.2 -3.4-294.3 7 153 -2.5 -3.3-574.7 12.5 291.0 575.6 0.062 -200 -2 9 -7 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 7 153 -2.5 -3.3-574.7 11 50 -3.3 -3.4-508.2 -113 2 Prox 7 153 -2.5 -3.3-574.7 12 57 -3.3 -3.4-567.1 -113 2 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 643 1.6 2.6 308.9 9 64 -3.2 -3.4-323.0 1.123 0.15 -1.12 4.20 -4.90 6 1 Qiojx 1 643 1.6 2.6 308.9 10 1214 -2.2 -3.4-294.3 1.560 0.15 -0.91 1.39-29.70 18 1 Qiojx 3 385 2.0 2.6 319.3 9 64 -3.2 -3.4-323.0 1.123 0.02 -1.01 2.58-11.52 6 3 Qiojx 3 385 2.0 2.6 319.3 10 1214 -2.2 -3.4-294.3 1.248 0.02 -0.87 0.07 23.22 10 3 Aiojx 3 2.0 307.8 10 2.5-353.6 1.248 0.02 -0.87 0.07 23.22 10 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 69.65 69.65 AZOXx: [x10o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 69.65 69.65 Qiojx 4 79 2.4 2.6 311.9 9 64 -3.2 -3.4-323.0 1.098 0.22 -0.92 1.10 -8.94 5 4 Qiojx 4 79 2.4 2.6 311.9 10 1214 -2.2 -3.4-294.3 1.075 0.22 -0.76 1.00 -1.00 4 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -1.000 10 x 4 o 2.371 2.454 3 o 7 2.0 2.6 0.0 69.7 69.7 2 JNOZ io ITo FSTo FETo RTo jz ITz FSTz FETz RTz BWzo YRTo YRTz RD Qoz TO NB i/j Qiojz 1 643 1.6 2.6 308.9 3 385 2.0 2.6 319.3 1.040 0.15 0.02 0.72 3.10 -1.50 1 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -1.500 3 o 3 x 2.032 2.625 10 x 7 1.1 2.5 0.0 69.7 69.7 2 JNOZ io ITo FSTo FETo RTo jz ITz FSTz FETz RTz BWzo YRTo YRTz RD Qoz TO NB i/j Qiojz 3 385 2.0 2.6 319.3 1 643 1.6 2.6 308.9 1.215 0.02 0.15 0.75 2.64-30.00 9 1 JNXZ iz ITz FSTz FETz RTRz jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxz YRTz RD Qzx TO NB i/j Qizjx 1 643 1.6 2.6 308.9 10 1214 -2.2 -3.4-294.3 1.104 0.15 -0.64 2.40-26.27 5 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -26.274 10 x 1 o 1.623 2.454 3 o 7 2.0 2.6 0.0 69.7 69.7 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 3 o 3x10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x10o 3 11 12 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 3 0.0 69.7 69.7 10 0.0 69.7 69.7 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.752 3 -3.498 10 9.000 0.065 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.6 -3.5 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 3 32 2.58 0 2.13 3.12 Admit k 8 3 1 0 2.59 0 Add k 8 3 1 0 0 308.9 354.0 167 73 Admit k 8 3 3 32 2.62 0 Add k 8 3 3 -32 0 319.3 315.8 121 117 Admit k 8 3 4 0 2.58 0 Add k 8 3 4 0 0 311.9 313.1 18 120 Result j 8 3 32 125 9 2.35 119 jj OK j 9 10 32 3.50 19 2.89 4.23 Admit k 9 10 9 0 -3.42 19 Add k 9 10 9 0 19-323.0-330.2 16 3 Admit k 9 10 10 32 -3.38 19 Add k 9 10 10 -32 19-294.3-350.6 347 211 Result j 9 10 32 215 18 2.76 329 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 33.74800 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.377 0.0795 3.227 0.1044 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.578 -3.498 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.62 247.57 401.8 0 0 2 3 2.03 284.21 577.6 32 0 3 10 -2.17 -267.92 580.1 32 0 4 4 2.37 299.81 710.9 0 0 5 6 2.42 407.02 983.4 0 -113 6 2 1.91 523.78 1000.8 0 -200 7 9 -3.24 -318.11 1029.7 0 0 8 5 2.46 514.20 1265.9 0 -113 9 7 -2.54 -534.71 1358.3 0 -200 10 8 2.50 550.03 1373.8 0 -113 11 11 -3.33 -506.61 1688.8 0 -113 12 12 -3.34 -559.90 1872.5 0 -113 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x10o 3] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6228 1.607E-03 2 3 2.0322 2.166E-02 3 4 2.3712 1.324E-07 4 9 2.3025 4.332E-07 5 10 1.1071 1.000E+00 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 10 1.1071 1.000E+00 2 1 1.6228 1.607E-03 3 3 2.0322 2.166E-02 4 9 2.3025 4.332E-07 5 4 2.3712 1.324E-07 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -10 1.1071 2.4538 1.000E+00 63 0 2 1 1.6228 2.5934 1.607E-03 0 0 3 3 2.0322 2.6246 2.166E-02 64 0 4 -9 2.3025 2.4973 4.332E-07 0 0 5 4 2.3712 2.5842 1.324E-07 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 2 1 1.607E-03 -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 3 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 4 IGj: 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.62 2.03 2.37 SrtFE 2.59 2.62 2.58 MANy= 62 64 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 ITRy= 643 385 79 XYTy= 57.1 79.9 159.0 RTRy= 308.9 319.3 311.9 BWjj=0.53950.32930.1184 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 3 MAN= 62 64 FST= 1.62 2.03 FET= 2.59 2.62 RST= 247.6 284.2 RET= 397.1 360.0 RTR= 308.9 319.3 XYT= 57.1 79.9 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 23.9519 -0.7620 0.7620 159.78 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 25 1 19 1 1 2.35 1.62 2.59 250.1 404.4 2.37 0.00 2.38 26 3 19 2 2 2.37 2.03 2.62 295.1 364.5 2.37 0.00 2.38 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6135 2.3719 3 2.3719 2.3772 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1757UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.74800 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=159.8 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.480 (±0.303) MHz, Height 261.4 (±14.0) km. ScaleHt-34.7 (± 9.9) km SlabT 48.2 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 23.6164 33.9840 56.4486 75.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.5778 3.4984 0.0000 0.0000 2.3772 3.2265 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.3772 253.2119 17.5 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8310 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 803.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.7295 211.8836 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 224.9492 1.7565 -5.7 8.3 109.7 3.9 3.9 70.7 0.466 106.9 19.2 -24.7 68.1 8 239.2037 2.1475 4.8 8.6 -38.6 3.9 2.0 41.7 0.770 -36.7 13.6 11.9 39.6 48 254.3616 2.3751 21.3 22.9 -19.8 3.8 1.0 19.9 0.727 -18.8 8.7 6.1 18.3 44 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 33.74800 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.377 253.21 17.52 0.231 0.346 0.578 1.497 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3142 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 33.74800 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 33.74800 998 22.5 22.0 -24.7 3.5 7.6 28.3 70.0 -21.8 9.6 13.8 26.8 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00009 0.00084 0.00234 0.00458 0.14530 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00024 0.00213 0.00591 0.01159 0.10701 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00126 0.01138 0.03162 0.06198 0.20128 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 9 4 0.00278 0.02506 0.06960 0.13642 0.17356 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 10 4 0.00009 0.00083 0.00229 0.00449 0.07812 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 DSND organized 3053 total echoes, or 97.2%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 2385 useful echoes, or 75.9%; in 5 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 643 9 2107 1.62 2.59 2.14 1.39 0.00 0.00 248 397 309 8 -45 51 -35 42 48 6 -1 0 100 -12 58 16 62 0 3 385 280 2047 2.03 2.62 2.30 2.14 0.00 0.00 284 360 319 13 -18 50 -78 70 48 5 7 11 181 -12 56 17 64 0 10 1214 414 3062 -2.17 -3.38 -2.88 0.00 -3.50 0.00 -268 -458 -294 12 -38 44 -24 59 53 6 5 7 -27 -107 64 16 63 0 4 79 843 2013 2.37 2.58 2.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 300 323 312 9 57 62 -148 114 43 3 10 12 125 67 111 13 0 0 9 64 2532 3086 -3.24 -3.42 -3.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 -318 -348 -323 8 27 28 -153 91 47 4 17 11 -90 144 126 13 0 0 POL rejected 7 multiple- & other traces: NIX 6 213 1053 1966 2.42 2.56 2.48 2.47 2.51 0.00 407 438 429 14 20 41 -12 55 44 3 1 10 517 -250 75 15 -113 0 2 104 47 1807 1.91 2.52 2.16 2.37 2.43 0.00 524 632 567 11 -84 136 -10 77 40 3 6 16 139 -913 93 14 -200 0 5 66 962 1973 2.46 2.55 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 514 486 510 16 111 75 145 112 43 3 -16 9 -187 115 88 15 -113 0 7 153 1201 2732 -2.54 -3.27 -2.95 0.00 -3.37 0.00 -535 -738 -575 11 -53 60 -26 87 43 3 11 11 94 1181 98 13 -200 0 8 25 1421 1822 2.50 2.54 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 550 548 558 14 -3 16 -1 9 40 3 25 36 -274 -245 106 14 -113 0 11 50 2783 3032 -3.33 -3.37 -3.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 -507 -497 -508 22 -78 65 51 68 50 5 -1 11 82 235 77 16 -113 0 12 57 2814 3053 -3.34 -3.39 -3.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 -560 -554 -567 23 -54 74 32 41 45 4 -2 11 -521 -148 95 14 -113 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1757UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.74800 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/02/02 at 18:03:50.1; *********************** MMAX= 3142: DSND normal termination