Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 19.7019 LT Hour= 1.7019 CosCHI=-.7452 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 33 STARTT=1265139727 UT_dDAY= 33.82092 LT_sDAY= 32.82092 FILNM = [TK02021942] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1942UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.82092 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/02/02 begin at 19:46:34.2 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 6414 3377 621 0 0 2380 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 33.82092 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3377 CLAZZ: NTRY = 3; CLZ = 12.0; JM, JMAX = 65 13; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.964 DSND organized 3255 total echoes, or 96.4%; in 13 traces; of which DSND selected 3255 useful echoes, or 96.4%; in 13 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 8 147 1419 3261 0.00 0.00 -3.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -434 15 55 110 32 106 50 5 -23 29 0 0 92 15 0 0 7 153 1071 2218 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 527 19 73 114 3 101 40 3 -13 20 0 0 103 13 0 0 12 32 2897 3271 0.00 0.00 -3.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -611 8 -90 84 65 89 47 3 -32 149 0 0 113 14 0 0 11 70 2015 2972 0.00 0.00 -2.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -686 21 -230 161 -196 136 43 4 3 12 0 0 119 13 0 0 10 208 1574 3157 0.00 0.00 -2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -636 13 -76 142 14 90 44 3 -29 72 0 0 78 15 0 0 9 299 1472 3272 0.00 0.00 -2.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -371 12 -78 72 -101 90 50 7 2 12 0 0 88 15 0 0 1 749 11 1999 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 330 11 -36 58 2 63 50 5 51 10 0 0 60 15 0 0 2 79 32 2153 0.00 0.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 586 12 -181 140 72 130 40 3 -10 16 0 0 109 13 0 0 6 826 479 3230 0.00 0.00 -2.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -318 8 -27 48 -11 65 55 8 -6 16 0 0 46 17 0 0 5 312 407 2491 0.00 0.00 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 361 12 61 103 -92 73 47 4 -5 11 0 0 68 14 0 0 4 40 130 1430 0.00 0.00 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 671 15 -285 210 -19 130 38 3 9 20 0 0 128 13 0 0 3 259 83 2630 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 436 14 77 118 91 97 43 3 -22 18 0 0 87 14 0 0 13 81 2911 3270 0.00 0.00 -3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -510 15 -64 75 -2 65 52 3 -4 10 0 0 89 14 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6101 2.4527 271.99 395.33-35.4635256.1279 2 1.7623 2.3760 562.29 603.78187.4986-56.3422 3 1.9122 2.6381 412.96 469.80137.4552-45.1659 4 2.1257 2.3166 688.88 725.70182.6170******** 5 2.0536 2.4768 313.48 387.35********150.9865 6 -2.1351 -3.2190 -294.59 -398.52-46.0249328.6135 7 2.2912 2.5929 518.15 531.82********677.4447 8 -2.5885 -3.2733 -423.77 -473.70 51.5143279.0665 9 -2.3886 -3.2627 -332.88 -434.49 40.7366158.9876 10 -2.4442 -3.0739 -595.48 -697.20140.6018******** 11 -2.6898 -3.0267 -665.83 -738.27181.6999267.9496 12 -3.1475 -3.1989 -595.82 -578.59********107.2013 13 -3.1447 -3.2930 -514.78 -515.85 96.3658-51.7993 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -10 11 3157 2972 -3.07 -2.69-697.2-665.8 -206 182 208 70 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 13 12 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.50 0.73 0.64 0.23 0.47 0 0.19 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.00 0.36 0.76 0.31 0.53 0 0.14 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.74 0.64 0.43 0.26 0.58 0 0.42 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0 0.13 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.94 0.76 1.00 0.45 0.25 0 0.44 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.64 0 0.58 0.77 0.54 0.05 0.07 7 0.54 0.28 1.00 0.08 0.62 0 0.18 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.92 0 0.41 0.98 0.64 0.08 0.19 9 0 0 0 0 0 0.95 0 0.77 0.52 0.67 0.06 0.13 10 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 0.75 1.00 0.35 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 0 0.03 1.00 12 0 0 0 0 0 0.50 0 0.87 0.80 0 0.35 0.09 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3255.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.23 0.82 0.71 0.82 0.46 0 0.35 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.18 0.02 0.30 0.53 0.12 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.29 0.70 0.08 0.68 0.40 0 0.44 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.18 0.47 0.32 0.01 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.54 0.88 0.60 0.93 0.10 0 0.30 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0.89 0.63 0.67 0 0 7 0.65 0.91 0.56 1.00 0.70 0 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.11 0 0.05 0.16 0.12 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0.37 0 0.84 0.09 0.36 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0.88 0.64 0.09 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 5 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 0 5 12 8 7 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 329.940 586.274 0.118 2 1 4 329.940 671.483 0.017 2 1 7 329.940 526.792 0.224 2 3 4 436.272 671.483 0.260 2 5 2 361.337 586.274 0.208 2 5 4 361.337 671.483 0.073 2 6 10 318.432 632.040 0.008 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 6 826 -2.1 -3.2-318.4 10 278 -2.4 -3.0-632.0 11.0 304.1 599.0 0.019 -200 -2 7 -10 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 10 278 -2.4 -3.0-632.0 11 32 -3.1 -3.2-610.6 -113 2 Prox 10 278 -2.4 -3.0-632.0 12 81 -3.1 -3.3-510.3 -113 2 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 749 1.6 2.5 329.9 6 826 -2.1 -3.2-318.4 1.532 0.26 -0.95 2.45-26.00 16 1 Qiojx 1 749 1.6 2.5 329.9 8 147 -2.6 -3.3-434.5 1.567 0.26 -0.74 0.05 41.23 17 1 Aiojx 1 1.5 331.1 8 2.4-445.9 1.567 0.26 -0.74 0.05 41.23 17 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 123.69 123.69 AZOXx: [x 8o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 123.69 123.69 Qiojx 1 749 1.6 2.5 329.9 9 299 -2.4 -3.3-371.0 1.659 0.26 -0.86 1.07 78.49 18 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 78.489 1 o 9 x 1.610 2.330 8 x 7 1.6 2.3 0.0 123.7 123.7 3 Qiojx 2 79 1.8 2.4 586.3 6 826 -2.1 -3.2-318.4 1.430 0.38 -1.76 9.28-11.31 8 2 Qiojx 2 79 1.8 2.4 586.3 8 147 -2.6 -3.3-434.5 1.461 0.38 -1.32 6.42 -6.00 9 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -6.000 8 x 2 o 1.762 2.341 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 123.7 123.7 2 Qiojx 2 79 1.8 2.4 586.3 9 299 -2.4 -3.3-371.0 1.548 0.38 -1.57 8.26-10.50 9 2 Qiojx 3 259 1.9 2.6 436.3 6 826 -2.1 -3.2-318.4 1.388 0.47 -1.22 4.81-10.50 9 3 Qiojx 3 259 1.9 2.6 436.3 8 147 -2.6 -3.3-434.5 1.419 0.47 -0.96 1.60-18.24 11 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -18.241 8 x 3 o 1.912 2.341 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 123.7 123.7 2 Qiojx 3 259 1.9 2.6 436.3 9 299 -2.4 -3.3-371.0 1.503 0.47 -1.09 2.14-19.05 12 3 Qiojx 4 40 2.1 2.3 671.5 6 826 -2.1 -3.2-318.4 1.354 0.23 -1.84 13.02 -7.83 5 4 Qiojx 4 40 2.1 2.3 671.5 8 147 -2.6 -3.3-434.5 1.367 0.23 -1.55 9.70 -7.83 5 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -7.826 8 x 4 o 2.126 2.317 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 123.7 123.7 2 Qiojx 4 40 2.1 2.3 671.5 9 299 -2.4 -3.3-371.0 1.367 0.23 -1.70 11.87 -5.59 5 4 Qiojx 5 312 2.1 2.5 361.3 6 826 -2.1 -3.2-318.4 1.166 0.01 -0.91 1.04-11.08 7 5 Qiojx 5 312 2.1 2.5 361.3 8 147 -2.6 -3.3-434.5 1.192 0.01 -0.75 0.94 12.23 8 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 12.228 8 x 5 o 2.054 2.341 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 123.7 123.7 2 Qiojx 5 312 2.1 2.5 361.3 9 299 -2.4 -3.3-371.0 1.263 0.01 -0.84 0.48 56.42 10 5 Aiojx 5 2.0 350.5 9 2.5-418.9 1.263 0.01 -0.84 0.48 56.42 10 -5 AZOXo: [o 5x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 169.26 169.26 AZOXx: [x 9o 5] TOz,o,x= 0.00 169.26 169.26 Qiojx 7 153 2.3 2.6 526.8 6 826 -2.1 -3.2-318.4 1.020 0.27 -1.30 6.78 -0.50 1 7 Qiojx 7 153 2.3 2.6 526.8 8 147 -2.6 -3.3-434.5 1.043 0.27 -1.11 3.78 -1.41 2 7 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -1.414 8 x 7 o 2.291 2.341 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 123.7 123.7 2 Qiojx 7 153 2.3 2.6 526.8 9 299 -2.4 -3.3-371.0 1.105 0.27 -1.18 4.24 -4.00 4 7 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -4.000 9 x 7 o 2.291 2.330 5 o 7 2.1 2.5 0.0 169.3 169.3 2 Qiojz 3 259 1.9 2.6 436.3 5 312 2.1 2.5 361.3 1.086 0.47 0.01 0.72 3.11 -0.50 1 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -0.500 5 o 5 x 2.054 2.477 9 x 7 1.4 2.3 0.0 169.3 169.3 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 8 2 3 4 5 o 5x 9 6 7 8 x 8o 1 9 x 9o 5 10 11 12 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 123.7 123.7 5 0.0 169.3 169.3 8 0.0 123.7 123.7 9 0.0 169.3 169.3 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 7 518.15 531.82 526.79 0.0165 0.0095 -46 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.638 3 -3.441 9 9.000 0.047 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.6 -3.4 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 3 32 2.64 0 2.18 3.19 Admit k 8 3 1 0 2.45 0 Add k 8 3 1 0 0 329.9 392.1 134 62 Admit k 8 3 2 0 2.38 0 Add k 8 3 2 0 0 586.3 600.1 14 67 Admit k 8 3 3 32 2.64 0 Add k 8 3 3 -32 0 436.3 461.6 85 93 Admit k 8 3 4 0 2.32 0 Add k 8 3 4 0 0 671.5 717.3 6 94 Admit k 8 3 5 0 2.48 0 Add k 8 3 5 0 0 361.3 354.4 119 147 Admit k 8 3 7 0 2.59 0 Add k 8 3 7 0 0 526.8 527.6 60 170 Result j 8 3 32 173 8 2.34 167 jj OK j 9 9 32 3.44 19 2.84 4.16 Admit k 9 9 6 0 -3.22 19 Add k 9 9 6 0 19-318.4-346.0 120 44 Admit k 9 9 8 0 -3.27 19 Add k 9 9 8 0 19-434.5-457.5 39 59 Admit k 9 9 9 32 -3.26 19 Add k 9 9 9 -32 19-371.0-387.9 46 69 Result j 9 9 32 72 15 2.66 235 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 33.82092 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.280 0.0721 3.018 0.0908 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.638 -3.441 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.61 271.99 437.9 0 0 2 6 -2.14 -294.59 629.0 0 0 3 5 2.05 313.48 643.8 0 0 4 3 1.91 412.96 789.6 32 0 5 9 -2.39 -332.88 795.1 32 0 6 2 1.76 562.29 991.0 0 0 7 8 -2.59 -423.77 1096.9 0 0 8 7 2.29 518.15 1187.2 0 0 9 10 -2.44 -595.48 1455.5 0 -200 10 4 2.13 688.88 1464.4 0 0 11 12 -3.14 -514.78 1618.8 0 -113 12 11 -3.15 -595.82 1875.3 0 -113 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 1x 8] JQ, k, M, C = 1 4 1o JQ, k, M, C = 1 7 8x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6101 1.000E+00 2 2 1.7623 1.078E-08 3 3 1.9122 4.684E-07 4 4 2.1257 8.299E-10 5 5 2.0536 3.848E-04 6 6 1.0699 2.539E-03 7 7 2.2912 1.090E-06 8 8 1.6004 1.361E-04 9 9 1.3733 5.240E-04 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 6 1.0699 2.539E-03 2 9 1.3733 5.240E-04 3 8 1.6004 1.361E-04 4 1 1.6101 1.000E+00 5 2 1.7623 1.078E-08 6 3 1.9122 4.684E-07 7 5 2.0536 3.848E-04 8 4 2.1257 8.299E-10 9 7 2.2912 1.090E-06 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -6 1.0699 2.2836 2.539E-03 0 0 2 -9 1.3733 2.3298 5.240E-04 32 0 3 -8 1.6004 2.3410 1.361E-04 63 0 4 1 1.6101 2.4527 1.000E+00 64 0 5 2 1.7623 2.3760 1.078E-08 0 0 6 3 1.9122 2.6381 4.684E-07 32 0 7 5 2.0536 2.4768 3.848E-04 0 0 8 4 2.1257 2.3166 8.299E-10 0 0 9 7 2.2912 2.5929 1.090E-06 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 6 2.539E-03 j 7 5 3.848E-04 M 7 9 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 6 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 5 3 2 7 4 IGj: 19 19 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.61 2.05 1.91 1.76 2.29 2.13 SrtFE 2.45 2.48 2.64 2.38 2.59 2.32 MANy= 64 62 32 0 0 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 749 312 259 79 153 40 XYTy= 35.8 110.2 119.4 194.7 73.0 285.3 RTRy= 329.9 361.3 436.3 586.3 526.8 671.5 BWjj=0.50070.25140.43140.36460.17930.1134 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 1 5 3 MAN= 64 62 32 FST= 1.61 2.05 1.91 FET= 2.45 2.48 2.64 RST= 272.0 313.5 413.0 RET= 395.3 387.3 469.8 RTR= 329.9 361.3 436.3 XYT= 35.8 110.2 119.4 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 1.7019 -0.7452 1.2548 159.96 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 24 1 19 1 1 2.24 1.61 2.45 282.4 421.5 2.28 0.00 2.28 25 5 19 2 2 2.27 2.05 2.48 343.0 423.6 2.28 0.00 2.28 26 3 19 3 3 2.29 1.91 2.64 383.1 497.1 2.28 0.00 2.28 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.5869 2.2674 5 2.2674 2.2924 3 2.2924 2.2803 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1942UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.82092 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=160.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.289 (±0.110) MHz, Height 263.9 (±13.8) km. ScaleHt 9.2 (±69.1) km SlabT 42.6 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 1.3664 34.0569 56.4486 75.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.6381 3.4410 0.0000 0.0000 2.2803 3.0182 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.2803 262.7741 25.1 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 4.8495 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 644.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.7991 182.3200 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 224.9492 1.7322 21.3 24.6 -20.8 12.5 9.4 40.2 0.579 -17.6 17.6 14.5 38.3 18 239.2037 2.0484 9.5 21.5 -14.4 6.5 0.3 33.1 0.573 -13.8 10.7 4.0 31.9 65 254.3616 2.2397 7.3 26.4 -10.7 4.9 -3.8 26.3 0.652 -11.3 8.1 -0.9 25.5 99 270.4800 2.2554 7.4 26.5 -10.3 4.8 -4.0 25.8 0.658 -11.0 8.0 -1.2 25.0 103 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 33.82092 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.280 262.77 25.15 0.327 0.457 0.785 1.397 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3377 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 4 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 33.82092 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 33.82092 998 -2.3 45.3 -29.6 5.0 -14.0 37.3 77.3 -32.2 11.5 -5.8 35.8 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00015 0.00137 0.00380 0.00745 0.14654 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00081 0.00730 0.02029 0.03977 0.91297 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 3 4 0.00028 0.00249 0.00692 0.01356 0.24103 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.64397 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 5 4 0.00004 0.00038 0.00106 0.00209 0.08958 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 6 4 0.00027 0.00244 0.00678 0.01328 0.07887 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 7 4 0.00034 0.00304 0.00845 0.01657 0.34884 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 8 4 0.00016 0.00144 0.00401 0.00787 0.33058 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 9 4 0.00004 0.00036 0.00101 0.00199 0.14764 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 DSND organized 3255 total echoes, or 96.4%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 2864 useful echoes, or 84.8%; in 9 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 749 11 1999 1.61 2.45 2.01 0.00 2.40 0.00 272 395 330 11 -36 58 2 63 50 5 51 0 -35 256 60 15 64 0 6 826 479 3230 -2.14 -3.22 -2.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 -295 -399 -318 8 -27 48 -11 65 55 8 -6 16 -46 329 46 17 62 0 5 312 407 2491 2.05 2.48 2.24 2.07 2.43 0.00 313 387 361 12 61 103 -92 73 47 4 -5 11 -238 151 68 14 62 0 3 259 83 2630 1.91 2.64 2.35 2.19 0.00 0.00 413 470 436 14 77 118 91 97 43 3 -22 18 137 -45 87 14 32 0 9 299 1472 3272 -2.39 -3.26 -2.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 -333 -434 -371 12 -78 72 -101 90 50 7 2 12 41 159 88 15 62 0 2 79 32 2153 1.76 2.38 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 562 604 586 12 -181 140 72 130 40 3 -10 16 187 -56 109 13 0 0 8 147 1419 3261 -2.59 -3.27 -3.03 0.00 -3.06 0.00 -424 -474 -434 15 55 110 32 106 50 5 -23 29 52 279 92 15 63 0 7 153 1071 2218 2.29 2.59 2.42 2.22 2.60 0.00 518 532 527 19 73 114 3 101 40 3 -13 20 -843 677 103 13 0 0 4 40 130 1430 2.13 2.32 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 689 726 671 15 -285 210 -19 130 38 3 9 20 183 -237 128 13 0 0 POL rejected 3 multiple- & other traces: NIX 10 278 1574 2972 -2.44 -3.03 -2.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 -595 -738 -632 19 -97 167 -16 120 44 3 -28 78 141 268 87 15 -200 0 12 81 2911 3270 -3.14 -3.29 -3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 -515 -516 -510 15 -64 75 -2 65 52 3 -4 10 96 -52 89 14 -113 0 11 32 2897 3271 -3.15 -3.20 -3.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 -596 -579 -611 8 -90 84 65 89 47 3 -32 149 -163 107 113 14 -113 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-02 1942UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 33.82092 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/02/02 at 19:49:36.0; *********************** MMAX= 3377: DSND normal termination