Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 7.4519 LT Hour= 13.4519 CosCHI=0.3201 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 42 STARTT=1265873227 UT_dDAY= 42.31050 LT_sDAY= 42.31050 FILNM = [TK02110727] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-11 0727UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 42.31050 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/02/11 begin at 07:31:48.5 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5448 2550 1179 0 0 1488 1 512 16.5 782.5 7 4 42.31050 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2550 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 46 12; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.956 DSND organized 2438 total echoes, or 95.6%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 2438 useful echoes, or 95.6%; in 12 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 8 49 1877 2509 0.00 0.00 -6.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -574 2 -1 18 14 19 36 2 -4 4 0 0 98 13 0 0 6 384 930 2534 0.00 0.00 -5.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -268 1 0 19 -1 16 50 6 -2 3 0 0 53 18 0 0 11 70 2152 2384 0.00 0.00 6.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 514 14 -18 36 -8 40 46 7 6 4 0 0 69 16 0 0 10 74 2079 2364 0.00 0.00 6.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 448 19 -8 30 2 26 43 5 3 3 0 0 82 16 0 0 9 66 1878 2397 0.00 0.00 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 711 19 21 59 -83 95 37 2 4 4 0 0 116 13 0 0 1 388 1 388 0.00 0.00 2.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 117 1 3 23 1 13 44 3 -2 10 0 0 74 14 0 0 7 21 1239 1452 0.00 0.00 4.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 746 5 47 46 -36 57 37 3 5 3 0 0 125 13 0 0 2 24 393 418 0.00 0.00 2.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 203 4 -5 20 -41 19 44 4 12 6 0 0 67 15 0 0 5 283 873 2391 0.00 0.00 5.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 519 3 2 38 -30 37 42 5 -2 7 0 0 86 15 0 0 4 38 466 845 0.00 0.00 3.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 457 5 59 66 11 98 37 2 49 13 0 0 125 14 0 0 3 998 419 2282 0.00 0.00 4.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 259 3 8 18 -7 19 52 6 2 14 0 0 43 17 0 0 12 43 2236 2393 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 641 28 92 87 -1 37 40 3 8 4 0 0 118 14 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.7163 2.5310 110.90 140.43 11.5296316.5435 2 2.7049 2.7325 181.65 178.04********223.4763 3 2.7896 6.4043 260.16 394.36********267.0053 4 3.0353 3.3691 450.02 452.91-21.3259 51.9513 5 3.9664 6.5472 470.97 575.86 18.2635555.7698 6 -4.1344 -7.0875 -249.04 -344.49 11.8447218.1414 7 4.9208 5.0279 747.46 754.50 57.2447 59.0538 8 -6.3379 -6.8176 -554.18 -605.07 74.4124171.9233 9 6.2075 6.4067 667.74 737.49474.4232 31.0656 10 6.3672 6.4600 432.00 467.82 NaN 34.8777 11 6.4182 6.5171 514.26 516.09 19.1315364.2704 12 6.4627 6.5341 635.35 635.88 NaN******** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -3 10 2282 2364 6.40 6.37 394.4 432.0 267****** 998 74 -10 11 2364 2384 6.46 6.42 467.8 514.3 35 19 1072 70 -5 12 2391 2393 6.55 6.46 575.9 635.4 556****** 283 43 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 12 9 -------------------------------------- Break E/Es at cusp --------------- j is ie fis fie JBWX TBWX TBFR TBWj ixR FxR HxR 1 1 388 1.5324 2.5548 1 0.2938 0.2938 0.1517 1 388 2.5548 151.68 BreakE cusp: 1 2.5171 136.70 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 4 0 0 0 0.55 0 0.16 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 1.00 1.00 6 0 0 0 1.00 0 0.09 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04 1.00 1.00 8 0 0 0.09 0 0.03 0 0.05 0.69 0.68 9 0 0 0 0 0.04 0 0.08 0.99 0.48 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 2438.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0 0.21 0 4 0 0 0 0.16 0 0.72 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0.41 0.42 6 0 0 0 0.28 0 0.02 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.40 0.63 8 0 0 0.79 0 0.59 0 0.60 0.47 0.71 9 0 0 0 0 0.58 0 0.37 0.29 0.13 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 10 8 0 9 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 4 6 268.176 574.421 0.069 2 8 3 260.560 457.042 0.131 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 8 1142 2.8 6.5 260.6 3 38 3.0 3.4 457.0 2.5 221.3 417.1 1.000 -200 -2 9 -3 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 3 38 3.0 3.4 457.0 9 326 4.0 6.5 520.5 -112 2 3 8 5 260.560 745.781 0.047 3 8 7 260.560 711.045 0.095 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 5 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 747.46 754.50 745.78 RELsr, RELer = 0.0023 0.0116; TOL = 0.030 PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -1 388 1.716 2.716 116.7 -8 1142 2.732 6.517 260.6 0.016 1 388 1.716 2.716 116.7 8 1142 2.732 6.517 260.6 0.016 2.72 JNZO: Is j z//o? RD=Rz/Ro~.94; build TO; if>8 make new jz: JNZO j ISTj IETj ITRj FSTj FETj RTRj YRTj YRTz RD Qoz CJG TO NB jz ISTz IETz ITRz FSTz FETz RTRz Qjzo 9 873 2393 326 4.0 6.5 520.53 -11.80 -53.46 0.95 0.16 7.00 19.80 8 Ajzo 9 1130 2393 284 4.6 6.6 540.5 10 873 1091 42 4.0 4.2 472.8 AZOXo: [o 9z10] TOz,o,x= 19.80 19.80 0.00 AZOXz: [z10o 9] TOz,o,x= 19.80 19.80 0.00 End JNZO; old, new JMAX = 9 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 7 66 6.2 6.4 711.0 4 384 -4.1 -7.1-268.2 1.017 0.14 -2.00 15.25 -2.60 3 7 Qiojx 8 1142 2.8 6.5 260.6 4 384 -4.1 -7.1-268.2 2.047 0.23 -0.94 0.06710.14 48 8 Aiojx 8 3.1 259.0 4 6.3-273.7 2.047 0.23 -0.94 0.06710.14 48 -8 AZOXo: [o 8x 4] TOz,o,x= 0.00 2130.42 2130.42 AZOXx: [x 4o 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 2130.42 2130.42 Qiojx 10 42 4.0 4.2 472.8 4 384 -4.1 -7.1-268.2 1.143 0.04 -1.84 13.52 -2.50 4 10 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.500 4 x 10 o 3.966 4.193 8 o 7 2.8 6.5 0.0 2130.4 2130.4 2 Qiojx 8 1142 2.8 6.5 260.6 6 49 -6.3 -6.8-574.4 1.162 0.23 -0.49 6.92 -7.50 9 8 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -7.500 8 o 6 x 5.480 5.965 4 x 7 3.2 6.2 0.0 2130.4 2130.4 3 Qiojz 8 1142 2.8 6.5 260.6 2 24 2.7 2.7 202.9 1.025 0.23 0.06 0.79 2.26 -1.41 2 2 Qiojz 8 1142 2.8 6.5 260.6 10 42 4.0 4.2 472.8 1.122 0.23 0.04 1.91 13.48-13.23 7 10 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -13.229 10 z 8 o 4.698 4.928 9 o 7 4.6 6.6 19.8 19.8 0.0 1 JNXZ iz ITz FSTz FETz RTRz jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxz YRTz RD Qzx TO NB i/j Qizjx 2 24 2.7 2.7 202.9 4 384 -4.1 -7.1-268.2 1.025 0.06 -0.71 1.15 -1.45 1 2 Qizjx 10 42 4.0 4.2 472.8 4 384 -4.1 -7.1-268.2 1.122 0.04 -1.80 14.41-32.15 7 10 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -32.146 4 x 10 o 3.966 4.193 8 o 7 2.8 6.5 0.0 2130.4 2130.4 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 3 4 x 4o 8 5 6 7 8 o 8x 4 9 o 9z10 10 z10o 9 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 4 0.0 2130.4 2130.4 8 0.0 2130.4 2130.4 9 19.8 19.8 0.0 10 19.8 19.8 0.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 10 470.97 476.16 472.79 0.0039 0.0071 -46 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -1 388 1.716 2.716 116.7 -8 1142 2.732 6.517 260.6 0.016 1 388 1.716 2.716 116.7 8 1142 2.732 6.517 260.6 0.016 2.72 QPNOX: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 -88.000 0 JEFSE: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 2.716 1 88.000 0 88.000 0 2.732 8 -3.974 4 MANIX: FZE IEZ FOE IEO FXE IEX DOZ IFZ DOX IFO DXZ IFX 0.000 0 2.724 1 0.000 0 2.724 0 2.724 8 1.599 0 sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 2.7237 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 6.560 8 -7.220 4 9.000 0.029 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 8 4 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 2.724 0.000 0.0 6.4 -7.2 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 3 1 18 2.72 0 2.25 3.30 Admit k 3 1 1 18 2.53 0 Add k 3 1 1 -18 0 116.7 128.1 27 1 jj OK j 4 8 32 2.72 0 2.25 3.30 Admit k 4 8 2 0 2.73 0 Add k 4 8 2 0 0 202.9 180.6 1 0 Admit k 4 8 8 32 6.52 0 Add k 4 8 8 -32 0 260.6 227.9 27 2 jj OK j 8 8 32 6.37 0 5.27 7.71 Admit k 8 8 7 0 6.41 0 Add k 8 8 7 0 0 711.0 704.5 27 9 Admit k 8 8 8 32 6.52 0 Add k 8 8 8 -32 0 260.6 348.7 215 126 Result j 8 8 32 243 9 5.76 128 jj OK j 9 4 32 7.22 19 5.97 8.74 Admit k 9 4 4 32 -7.09 19 Add k 9 4 4 -32 19-268.2-292.3 39 5 Admit k 9 4 6 0 -6.82 19 Add k 9 4 6 0 19-574.4-582.2 5 6 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 42.31050 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 6.324 0.0585 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 2.724 0.000 0.000 6.371 -7.220 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.72 110.90 190.3 32 0 2 2 2.70 181.65 491.3 0 0 3 8 2.79 260.16 725.7 32 0 4 4 -4.13 -249.04 1029.7 32 0 5 3 3.04 450.02 1365.9 0 -200 6 10 3.97 470.97 1868.1 0 -46 7 9 4.63 489.00 2264.1 0 -112 8 6 -6.34 -554.18 3512.4 0 0 9 5 4.92 747.46 3678.1 0 -699 10 7 6.21 667.74 4144.9 0 0 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 4o 8] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.7163 1.133E-05 2 2 2.7049 7.467E-12 3 4 3.2377 1.000E+00 4 6 5.4804 8.298E-09 5 7 6.2075 2.922E-13 6 8 2.7896 6.180E-02 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 1 1.7163 1.133E-05 2 2 2.7049 7.467E-12 3 8 2.7896 6.180E-02 4 4 3.2377 1.000E+00 5 6 5.4804 8.298E-09 6 7 6.2075 2.922E-13 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 1 1.7163 2.5310 1.133E-05 32 0 2 2 2.7049 2.7325 7.467E-12 0 0 3 8 2.7896 6.5171 6.180E-02 64 0 4 -4 3.2377 6.2369 1.000E+00 63 0 5 -6 5.4804 5.9647 8.298E-09 0 0 6 7 6.2075 6.4067 2.922E-13 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 1 1.133E-05 j 3 8 6.180E-02 M 3 4 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 4 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 2 8 7 IGj: 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.72 2.70 2.79 6.21 SrtFE 2.53 2.73 6.52 6.41 MANy= 62 0 64 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 388 24 1142 66 XYTy= 3.6 40.9 10.4 85.2 RTRy= 116.7 202.9 260.6 711.0 BWjj=0.15170.00510.69400.0371 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 1 2 8 MAN= 62 0 64 FST= 1.72 2.70 2.79 FET= 2.53 2.73 6.52 RST= 110.9 181.7 260.2 RET= 140.4 178.0 516.1 RTR= 116.7 202.9 260.6 XYT= 3.6 40.9 10.4 Daytime START = 90.00 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 29 1 19 1 1 2.55 1.53 2.53 110.9 140.4 2.72 2.72 6.37 30 put FOE=FLO= 2.724 31 2 19 2 2 2.75 2.70 2.73 202.9 184.4 6.32 2.72 6.32 83 8 19 3 3 6.24 2.79 6.52 280.9 556.4 6.32 2.72 6.32 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6086 2.7237 2 2.7478 2.7825 8 2.7825 6.3237 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-11 0727UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 42.31050 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START= 90.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.653 (±0.193) MHz, Height 115.0 (± 1.9) km. ScaleHt -8.8 (± 1.9) km SlabT 12.1 km 2 Iter. Valley 14.4 km wide, 0.05 MHz deep. devn11.95 km. 7 terms fit 9 O + 0 X + 4. hx= 130.7 PEAK 6.521 (±0.040) MHz, Height 238.0 (± 1.8) km. ScaleHt 40.1 (± 1.3) km SlabT 65.5 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 13.1164 42.5465 56.4486 91.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 2.7237 0.0000 6.3708 7.2202 0.0000 0.0000 6.3237 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 6.3237 226.1913 26.2 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 1.1038 0.7971 0.5926 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 1095.0000 1.4936 221.2965 1.2334 308.7898 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 101.2043 2.2311 -8.1 38.6 20.7 7.0 -0.7 59.4 0.468 19.8 20.3 -6.1 56.2 38 107.6174 2.5632 -7.2 30.8 -0.2 5.8 -1.1 62.3 0.454 -0.4 20.0 -1.1 59.3 63 114.4369 2.7034 -7.2 30.8 -0.2 5.8 -1.1 62.3 0.454 -0.4 20.0 -1.1 59.3 63 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 11 129.3996 2.7491 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 137.5994 2.9519 -55.9 101.7 4.8 6.0 1.5 24.8 0.460 5.0 9.3 0.2 23.8 11 146.3187 3.2077 -13.6 89.4 -38.4 4.4 0.3 119.5 0.466 -37.0 29.9 10.3 115.7 24 155.5906 3.4618 -12.1 70.5 -23.4 3.5 -0.1 105.3 0.462 -22.6 26.5 6.0 102.0 41 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 727 739 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 733 805 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 740 815 165.4501 3.7549 292.0 489.7 1025.1 39.1 27.9 788.8 0.513 997.1 219.4 -239.5 758.7 53 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 727 739 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 733 805 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 740 815 175.9342 4.2113 185.4 457.3 664.6 26.3 17.5 540.9 0.580 646.3 150.9 -155.8 520.1 73 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 727 739 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 733 805 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 740 815 187.0828 4.7848 120.1 308.7 434.1 17.8 10.7 357.1 0.666 422.0 99.8 -102.6 343.3 95 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 727 739 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 733 805 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 740 815 198.9379 5.4800 86.1 237.3 307.6 12.8 6.8 260.4 0.736 298.7 72.8 -73.4 250.4 118 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 727 739 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 733 805 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 740 815 211.5442 6.0217 70.8 204.4 257.0 10.9 5.4 225.3 0.740 249.5 62.5 -61.6 216.8 140 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 727 739 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 733 805 FITVTrc abandons VFIT, is, ie = 740 815 224.9492 6.3151 66.2 200.1 240.3 11.2 5.1 235.4 0.720 233.4 62.8 -57.6 227.2 157 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 42.31050 2.724 119.18 17.35 6.324 226.19 26.16 2.882 3.659 6.541 1.270 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2550 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 2 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 42.31050 999 -1.1 21.9 -4.0 6.9 -0.4 91.2 41.4 -3.9 23.1 0.6 88.5 RIQ.11111111 42.31050 998 4.6 52.9 2.4 2.7 -3.0 47.5 80.3 1.5 12.3 -3.5 45.9 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00001 0.00002 0.32839 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.11128 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 4 4 0.00006 0.00058 0.00161 0.00316 0.13908 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 6 4 0.00018 0.00161 0.00446 0.00874 0.26634 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 7 4 0.00010 0.00088 0.00245 0.00481 0.19150 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 8 4 0.00001 0.00008 0.00021 0.00041 0.11546 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 DSND organized 2438 total echoes, or 95.6%; in 10 traces; of which DSND selected 2053 useful echoes, or 80.5%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 388 1 388 1.72 2.53 2.15 0.00 2.72 2.72 111 140 117 1 3 23 1 13 44 3 -2 10 12 317 74 14 62 0 2 24 393 418 2.70 2.73 2.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 182 178 203 4 -5 20 -41 19 44 4 12 6 -347 223 67 15 0 0 8 1142 419 2384 2.79 6.52 4.77 2.73 0.00 2.72 260 516 261 4 7 18 -8 19 51 7 2 14 -511 364 46 17 64 0 4 384 930 2534 -4.13 -7.09 -5.83 0.00 -7.22 0.00 -249 -344 -268 1 0 19 -1 16 50 6 -2 3 12 218 53 18 63 0 6 49 1877 2509 -6.34 -6.82 -6.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 -554 -605 -574 2 -1 18 14 19 36 2 -4 4 74 172 98 13 0 0 7 66 1878 2397 6.21 6.41 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 668 737 711 19 21 59 -83 95 37 2 4 4 474 31 116 13 0 0 POL rejected 4 multiple- & other traces: NIX 3 38 466 845 3.04 3.37 3.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 450 453 457 3 59 64 11 94 37 2 49 14 -21 52 125 14 -200 0 10 42 873 1091 3.97 4.19 4.08 2.73 0.00 0.00 471 476 473 1 16 65 -103 28 36 3 -4 10 18 32 97 14 -46 0 9 284 1130 2393 4.63 6.56 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 489 602 540 7 2 32 -9 40 42 5 0 5 44 1185 88 15 -112 0 5 21 1239 1452 4.92 5.03 4.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 747 754 746 5 47 46 -36 57 37 3 5 3 57 59 125 13 -699 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-11 0727UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 42.31050 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/02/11 at 07:37:34.9; *********************** MMAX= 2550: DSND normal termination