Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 13.7019 LT Hour= 19.7019 CosCHI=-.3571 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 42 STARTT=1265895727 UT_dDAY= 42.57092 LT_sDAY= 42.57092 FILNM = [TK02111342] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-11 1342UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 42.57092 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/02/11 begin at 13:46:46.0 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5724 2956 1034 0 0 1672 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 42.57092 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2956 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 62 11; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.964 DSND organized 2849 total echoes, or 96.4%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 2849 useful echoes, or 96.4%; in 11 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 7 96 1626 2331 0.00 0.00 2.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 657 18 18 58 17 68 45 3 -3 11 0 0 75 14 0 0 6 110 1513 2304 0.00 0.00 2.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 514 16 8 44 -13 40 53 5 0 6 0 0 40 16 0 0 10 31 2804 2917 0.00 0.00 -3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -536 22 127 92 -7 5 52 2 -2 7 0 0 129 13 0 0 9 102 2358 2738 0.00 0.00 -3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -617 11 -15 93 3 88 43 3 2 13 0 0 104 14 0 0 8 138 1644 2411 0.00 0.00 2.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 582 17 -22 63 25 56 48 5 0 7 0 0 57 19 0 0 1 741 42 2385 0.00 0.00 2.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 305 7 -10 43 3 37 53 7 -2 7 0 0 41 20 0 0 2 735 49 2273 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 578 11 -2 85 -10 59 46 5 4 10 0 0 62 16 0 0 5 150 1488 2384 0.00 0.00 2.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 483 20 -26 72 35 51 47 7 0 10 0 0 69 20 0 0 4 489 759 2913 0.00 0.00 -3.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -297 4 13 47 7 29 52 7 -2 9 0 0 69 16 0 0 3 208 602 2376 0.00 0.00 2.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 323 13 24 66 24 57 44 4 4 10 0 0 103 14 0 0 11 49 2806 2922 0.00 0.00 -3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -490 17 24 44 -16 25 55 3 0 5 0 0 95 13 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6374 2.8584 241.00 449.87 38.3961173.5263 2 1.7729 2.8105 495.26 730.11 65.9692******** 3 2.3757 2.8522 287.62 408.00136.0956 48.0657 4 -2.5419 -3.5940 -271.46 -444.63 6.4411681.3845 5 2.7110 2.8712 465.17 509.63361.1409******** 6 2.7187 2.7818 505.91 539.58525.9642 41.5462 7 2.7494 2.8129 669.10 659.05********-70.7266 8 2.7417 2.8536 577.82 577.10**************** 9 -3.0510 -3.4652 -588.16 -729.24165.5522629.5153 10 -3.5936 -3.6114 -549.25 -558.43892.4802538.2203 11 -3.5843 -3.6099 -488.44 -502.60********863.8909 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs NO Trace Consolidations; JMAX= 11 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0.62 0.85 0.39 0 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.09 0 0 0 2 1.00 0.53 0.42 0 0.10 0.06 0.06 0.07 0 0 0 3 1.00 0.91 0.24 0 0.30 0.13 0.13 0.23 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.53 0 0 0 0 0.39 0 0.01 5 0.92 0.62 0.88 0 0.08 0.39 0.40 0.70 0 0 0 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 0.03 0.51 0.64 0 0 0 7 1.00 0.96 1.00 0 1.00 0.51 0.03 1.00 0 0 0 8 1.00 0.61 0.99 0 1.00 0.36 0.57 0.06 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0.21 0 0 10 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.92 11 0 0 0 0.38 0 0 0 0 0 0.64 0.01 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 2849.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0.26 0.49 0.56 0 0.31 0.21 0.24 0.20 0 0 0 2 0.51 0.26 0.59 0 0.21 0.22 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.44 0.41 0.07 0 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.12 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 0 0 0.50 0 0 5 0.69 0.79 0.84 0 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.20 0 0 0 6 0.79 0.78 0.85 0 0.76 0.04 0.23 0.18 0 0 0 7 0.76 1.00 0.85 0 0.76 0.77 0.03 0.21 0 0 0 8 0.80 1.00 0.88 0 0.80 0.82 0.79 0.05 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0.50 0 0 0 0 0.04 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 12 6 0 6 6 6 16 0 6 7 9 0 5 8 6 12 6 0 9 0 10 0 11 11 10 7 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 304.507 578.463 0.051 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 741 1.6 2.9 304.5 2 735 1.8 2.8 578.5 15.0 303.0 581.0 0.234 -200 -2 13 -2 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 2 735 1.8 2.8 578.5 5 150 2.7 2.9 482.6 -111 2 Prox 2 735 1.8 2.8 578.5 6 110 2.7 2.8 513.5 -111 2 Prox 2 735 1.8 2.8 578.5 7 96 2.7 2.8 657.1 -112 2 Prox 2 735 1.8 2.8 578.5 8 138 2.7 2.9 581.8 -112 2 2 4 9 296.615 616.996 0.039 A12M 4 489 -2.5 -3.6-296.6 9 102 -3.1 -3.5-617.0 6.0 280.2 546.7 0.126 -200 -2 7 -9 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 9 102 -3.1 -3.5-617.0 10 31 -3.6 -3.6-535.6 -113 2 2 4 11 296.615 489.658 0.191 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 7 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 669.10 659.05 657.10 RELsr, RELer = 0.0181 0.0030; TOL = 0.030 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 741 1.6 2.9 304.5 4 489 -2.5 -3.6-296.6 1.694 0.27 -0.91 0.92-16.42 22 1 Qiojx 1 741 1.6 2.9 304.5 11 49 -3.6 -3.6-489.7 1.014 0.27 -0.85 0.13 2.50 1 1 Aiojx 1 2.7 420.5 11 2.7-495.1 1.014 0.27 -0.85 0.13 2.50 1 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x11] TOz,o,x= 0.00 7.50 7.50 AZOXx: [x11o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 7.50 7.50 Qiojx 3 208 2.4 2.9 322.7 4 489 -2.5 -3.6-296.6 1.162 0.33 -0.86 0.13 45.25 8 3 Aiojx 3 2.3 319.0 4 2.7-372.4 1.162 0.33 -0.86 0.13 45.25 8 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x 4] TOz,o,x= 0.00 135.76 135.76 AZOXx: [x 4o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 135.76 135.76 Qiojx 3 208 2.4 2.9 322.7 11 49 -3.6 -3.6-489.7 1.014 0.33 -0.75 1.32 0.00 1 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 0.000 3 o 11 x 2.668 2.694 4 x 7 1.5 2.7 0.0 135.8 135.8 3 0.000 11 x 3 o 2.668 2.694 1 o 7 1.6 2.9 0.0 7.5 7.5 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x11 2 3 o 3x 4 4 x 4o 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 x11o 1 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 7.5 7.5 3 0.0 135.8 135.8 4 0.0 135.8 135.8 11 0.0 7.5 7.5 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.892 3 0.000 0 9.000 9.000 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.9 0.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 3 16 2.89 0 2.39 3.50 Admit k 8 3 1 0 2.86 0 Add k 8 3 1 0 0 304.5 370.6 187 76 Admit k 8 3 3 16 2.85 0 Add k 8 3 3 -16 0 322.7 346.8 58 91 Result j 8 3 16 109 9 2.63 90 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 42.57092 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.689 0.0904 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.892 0.000 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.64 241.00 394.6 0 0 2 3 2.38 287.62 683.3 16 0 3 4 -2.54 -271.46 690.0 0 0 4 2 1.77 495.26 878.0 0 -200 5 5 2.71 465.17 1261.1 0 -111 6 6 2.72 505.91 1375.4 0 -111 7 8 2.74 577.82 1584.2 0 -112 8 11 -3.58 -488.44 1750.7 0 0 9 9 -3.05 -588.16 1794.5 0 -200 10 7 2.75 669.10 1839.6 0 -699 11 10 -3.59 -549.25 1973.8 0 -113 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 4o 3] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6374 4.233E-01 2 3 2.3757 9.137E-04 3 4 1.5482 1.000E+00 4 11 2.6676 8.017E-07 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 4 1.5482 1.000E+00 2 1 1.6374 4.233E-01 3 3 2.3757 9.137E-04 4 11 2.6676 8.017E-07 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -4 1.5482 2.6777 1.000E+00 63 0 2 1 1.6374 2.8584 4.233E-01 0 0 3 3 2.3757 2.8522 9.137E-04 64 0 4 -11 2.6676 2.6943 8.017E-07 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 4 1.000E+00 M 1 3 o j 2 1 4.233E-01 M 2 11 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 2 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 IGj: 19 19 SrtFS 1.64 2.38 SrtFE 2.86 2.85 MANy= 62 64 NIXy= 0 0 ITRy= 741 208 XYTy= 10.4 33.9 RTRy= 304.5 322.7 BWjj=0.61860.2414 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 3 MAN= 62 64 FST= 1.64 2.38 FET= 2.86 2.85 RST= 241.0 287.6 RET= 449.9 408.0 RTR= 304.5 322.7 XYT= 10.4 33.9 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 19.7019 -0.3571 0.3571 140.46 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 31 1 19 1 1 2.66 1.64 2.86 238.3 472.3 2.69 0.00 2.69 32 3 19 2 2 2.69 2.38 2.85 275.9 429.7 2.69 0.00 2.69 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6024 2.6882 3 2.6882 2.6886 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-11 1342UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 42.57092 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=140.5 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.805 (±0.221) MHz, Height 269.2 (±11.1) km. ScaleHt-42.7 (± 8.0) km SlabT 60.6 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 19.3664 42.8069 56.4486 91.0 1.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.8923 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6886 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.6886 254.8123 24.2 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 7.5678 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 611.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6718 25.0892 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 211.5442 1.9565 6.1 16.4 -27.1 4.2 -1.1 49.9 0.437 -26.4 14.8 6.0 47.8 17 224.9492 2.2466 9.5 37.5 -30.9 4.9 -2.5 53.2 0.434 -30.5 17.2 5.6 50.6 44 239.2037 2.5510 3.8 26.3 -25.2 3.8 -0.4 51.8 0.519 -24.4 15.9 6.1 49.5 74 254.3616 2.6856 0.7 21.6 -21.4 2.9 0.1 44.6 0.561 -20.7 13.3 5.7 42.6 98 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 42.57092 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.689 254.81 24.25 0.435 0.613 1.048 1.410 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2956 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 42.57092 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111111 42.57092 998 -7.2 14.9 -23.6 1.8 2.2 22.1 59.0 -22.2 6.1 8.3 21.3 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00002 0.00018 0.00051 0.00099 0.14327 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00005 0.00049 0.00137 0.00268 0.17563 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00002 0.00021 0.00058 0.00114 0.12954 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 11 4 0.00008 0.00075 0.00209 0.00409 0.08109 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 11 DSND organized 2849 total echoes, or 96.4%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 1487 useful echoes, or 50.3%; in 4 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 741 42 2385 1.64 2.86 2.36 0.00 2.79 0.00 241 450 305 7 -10 43 3 37 53 7 -2 7 38 174 41 20 62 0 3 208 602 2376 2.38 2.85 2.62 2.77 0.00 0.00 288 408 323 13 24 66 24 57 44 4 4 10 136 48 103 14 64 0 4 489 759 2913 -2.54 -3.59 -3.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 -271 -445 -297 4 13 47 7 29 52 7 -2 9 6 681 69 16 63 0 11 49 2806 2922 -3.58 -3.61 -3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 -488 -503 -490 17 24 44 -16 25 55 3 0 5 -307 864 95 13 62 0 POL rejected 7 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 735 49 2273 1.77 2.81 2.42 0.00 2.81 0.00 495 730 578 11 -2 85 -10 59 46 5 4 10 66 -1055 62 16 -200 0 5 150 1488 2384 2.71 2.87 2.78 2.65 2.57 0.00 465 510 483 20 -26 72 35 51 47 7 0 10 361 -155 69 20 -111 0 6 110 1513 2304 2.72 2.78 2.75 2.69 0.00 0.00 506 540 514 16 8 44 -13 40 53 5 0 6 526 42 40 16 -111 0 8 138 1644 2411 2.74 2.85 2.78 0.00 2.77 0.00 578 577 582 17 -22 63 25 56 48 5 0 7 1891 -241 57 19 -112 0 9 102 2358 2738 -3.05 -3.47 -3.28 0.00 -3.67 0.00 -588 -729 -617 11 -15 93 3 88 43 3 2 13 166 630 104 14 -200 0 7 96 1626 2331 2.75 2.81 2.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 669 659 657 18 18 58 17 68 45 3 -3 11 1176 -71 75 14 -699 0 10 31 2804 2917 -3.59 -3.61 -3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 -549 -558 -536 22 127 92 -7 5 52 2 -2 7 892 538 129 13 -113 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-02-11 1342UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 42.57092 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/02/11 at 13:49:39.0; *********************** MMAX= 2956: DSND normal termination