Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 15.7019 LT Hour= 21.7019 CosCHI=-.1857 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 223 STARTT=1281541327 UT_dDAY= 223.65425 LT_sDAY= 223.65425 FILNM = [TK08111542] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-08-11 1542UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 223.65425 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/08/11 begin at 15:45:15.4 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 6510 3636 1590 0 0 1519 1 512 16.5 782.5 9 4 223.65425 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3636 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 50 14; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.960 DSND organized 3491 total echoes, or 96.0%; in 14 traces; of which DSND selected 3491 useful echoes, or 96.0%; in 14 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 9 162 1327 3480 0.00 0.00 -3.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -538 7 43 74 -33 51 50 5 -2 9 0 0 101 14 0 0 7 105 936 2734 0.00 0.00 -2.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -216 3 -20 41 19 26 46 3 -2 11 0 0 100 14 0 0 13 22 3490 3598 0.00 0.00 5.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 489 10 31 15 15 17 60 5 79 161 0 0 131 17 0 0 12 109 1515 3193 0.00 0.00 -3.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -361 3 27 51 -7 30 46 3 0 8 0 0 110 13 0 0 11 391 1459 3507 0.00 0.00 -3.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -265 1 5 31 -7 23 62 5 -2 5 0 0 62 17 0 0 10 213 1423 3634 0.00 0.00 -3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -428 2 -6 57 -5 70 53 5 11 6 0 0 90 14 0 0 1 972 1 3526 0.00 0.00 2.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 267 2 1 32 -7 26 56 7 0 5 0 0 57 17 0 0 8 31 1013 1831 0.00 0.00 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 743 2 46 231 -90 57 43 3 -6 9 0 0 110 14 0 0 2 317 2 974 0.00 0.00 2.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 107 1 -7 22 5 16 46 2 3 9 0 0 88 13 0 0 6 25 777 1779 0.00 0.00 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 611 11 -84 83 -108 66 40 2 -4 6 0 0 124 14 0 0 5 356 623 3150 0.00 0.00 -3.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -108 2 -5 25 3 14 52 3 1 6 0 0 75 15 0 0 4 411 357 3525 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 543 3 5 79 -64 66 49 5 -2 8 0 0 83 15 0 0 3 349 166 2784 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 383 5 -10 69 -7 48 45 3 0 11 0 0 94 14 0 0 14 28 3504 3627 0.00 0.00 -5.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -716 20 43 28 -9 20 54 3 -140 166 0 0 182 11 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.7046 4.9637 227.11 328.41186.6157 93.6778 2 1.6351 2.4409 108.14 106.73 5.1421-32.7520 3 1.9766 3.4090 341.09 419.89 17.7789 55.2183 4 2.0734 4.7897 472.91 620.64 31.2056 79.2098 5 -2.4902 -3.9251 -108.68 -107.82 -9.3756 3.9998 6 2.4119 2.7750 591.99 621.41153.2626 40.6093 7 -2.5855 -3.2131 -216.70 -215.28 -5.5138 -2.7986 8 2.6831 2.9832 741.34 760.00 59.1690 61.2552 9 -3.0455 -4.6582 -536.66 -558.00 -0.0369 49.5334 10 -2.9489 -5.3976 -396.00 -449.71 14.9261 20.9972 11 -2.8857 -4.9557 -251.79 -288.16 1.0306 26.0543 12 -2.9221 -3.9351 -329.21 -369.95******** 20.1906 13 5.0773 5.3374 484.20 496.50 38.4654******** 14 -5.2790 -5.5593 -701.08 -746.37 55.2737258.7082 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs NO Trace Consolidations; JMAX= 14 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 0.83 0.23 0.44 0.83 0 0.11 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.91 0.21 0.58 0.46 0 0.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.00 0.32 0.37 0.93 0 0.25 0 0.21 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.00 0.14 0.49 0.69 0 0.13 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.37 0 0.44 0 0.61 0.68 0.72 0.70 0 0 6 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 0 0.09 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 0.16 0 0.27 0.42 0.52 0.46 0 0 8 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 0 0.31 0 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0.55 0 0.10 0 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.55 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0.40 0 0.11 0 0.66 0.62 0.82 0.40 0 0.05 11 0 0 0 0 0.50 0 0.16 0 0.78 0.97 0.53 0.49 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0.99 0 0.29 0 0.88 0.97 1.00 0.26 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.42 0 0 0 0.07 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3491.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 0.28 0.46 0.67 0.68 0 0.78 0 0.69 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.54 0.09 0.57 0.60 0 0.40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.33 0.43 0.10 0.42 0 0.75 0 0.63 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.32 0.40 0.58 0.12 0 0.70 0 0.61 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.10 0 0.77 0 0.67 0.52 0.43 0.73 0 0 6 0.22 0.60 0.25 0.30 0 0.01 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0.23 0 0.03 0 0.40 0.30 0.29 0.27 0 0 8 0.31 0 0.37 0.39 0 0.75 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0.60 0 0.05 0.42 0.23 0.48 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0.48 0 0.70 0 0.58 0.06 0.28 0.64 0 0.45 11 0 0 0 0 0.57 0 0.71 0 0.77 0.72 0.11 0.69 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0.27 0 0.73 0 0.52 0.36 0.31 0.03 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.55 0 0 0 0.01 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 0 13 0 14 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 4 267.292 542.970 0.016 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 972 1.7 5.0 267.3 4 411 2.1 4.8 543.0 37.0 258.9 507.8 1.000 -200 -2 30 -4 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 4 411 2.1 4.8 543.0 13 22 5.1 5.3 489.2 -112 2 2 1 6 267.292 611.079 0.134 3 1 6 267.292 611.079 0.270 3 1 8 267.292 743.071 0.076 2 2 1 107.035 267.292 0.221 3 2 1 107.035 267.292 0.183 3 2 3 107.035 383.013 0.176 4 2 3 107.035 383.013 0.111 2 3 6 383.013 611.079 0.225 2 3 8 383.013 743.071 0.030 2 5 7 108.490 215.862 0.005 A12M 5 356 -2.5 -3.9-108.5 7 105 -2.6 -3.2-215.9 9.5 104.2 201.3 1.000 -200 -2 12 -7 2 5 11 108.490 265.151 0.200 3 5 10 108.490 427.581 0.271 3 5 11 108.490 265.151 0.204 3 5 12 108.490 361.438 0.105 4 5 9 108.490 537.822 0.214 4 5 10 108.490 427.581 0.015 4 5 12 108.490 361.438 0.182 2 10 14 427.581 715.640 0.178 2 11 9 265.151 537.822 0.014 A12M 11 391 -2.9 -5.0-265.2 9 162 -3.0 -4.7-537.8 7.0 215.6 446.0 1.000 -200 -2 14 -9 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 9 162 -3.0 -4.7-537.8 14 28 -5.3 -5.6-715.6 -112 2 2 11 10 265.151 427.581 0.214 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 8 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 741.34 760.00 743.07 RELsr, RELer = 0.0023 0.0225; TOL = 0.030 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 972 1.7 5.0 267.3 5 356 -2.5 -3.9-108.5 2.110 0.23 -2.26 21.76-62.99 30 1 Qiojx 1 972 1.7 5.0 267.3 10 213 -2.9 -5.4-427.6 2.744 0.23 -0.61 3.61-85.78 35 1 Qiojx 1 972 1.7 5.0 267.3 11 391 -2.9 -5.0-265.2 2.281 0.23 -0.96 1.16****** 43 1 Qiojx 1 972 1.7 5.0 267.3 12 109 -2.9 -3.9-361.4 1.800 0.23 -0.68 2.46-30.92 17 1 Qiojx 2 317 1.6 2.4 107.0 5 356 -2.5 -3.9-108.5 1.525 0.31 -0.99 2.32-28.86 17 2 Qiojx 2 317 1.6 2.4 107.0 10 213 -2.9 -5.4-427.6 1.380 0.31 -0.27 8.13-17.32 12 2 Qiojx 2 317 1.6 2.4 107.0 11 391 -2.9 -5.0-265.2 1.358 0.31 -0.42 5.91-13.86 12 2 Qiojx 2 317 1.6 2.4 107.0 12 109 -2.9 -3.9-361.4 1.293 0.31 -0.30 7.65-13.50 9 2 Qiojx 3 349 2.0 3.4 383.0 5 356 -2.5 -3.9-108.5 1.901 0.24 -3.45 41.77-56.28 22 3 Qiojx 3 349 2.0 3.4 383.0 10 213 -2.9 -5.4-427.6 2.116 0.24 -0.92 1.27 59.95 23 3 Aiojx 3 1.8 375.9 10 3.8-410.0 2.116 0.24 -0.92 1.27 59.95 23 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 179.84 179.84 AZOXx: [x10o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 179.84 179.84 Qiojx 3 349 2.0 3.4 383.0 11 391 -2.9 -5.0-265.2 2.091 0.24 -1.47 9.78-70.01 29 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -70.007 3 o 11 x 1.977 3.409 10 x 7 2.0 4.5 0.0 179.8 179.8 3 Qiojx 3 349 2.0 3.4 383.0 12 109 -2.9 -3.9-361.4 1.800 0.24 -1.03 3.48-34.00 16 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -34.000 3 o 12 x 1.977 3.032 10 x 7 2.0 4.5 0.0 179.8 179.8 3 Qiojx 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 5 356 -2.5 -3.9-108.5 1.288 0.08 -5.62 69.06 -7.21 5 6 Qiojx 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 10 213 -2.9 -5.4-427.6 1.288 0.08 -1.48 8.84 -7.21 5 6 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -7.208 10 x 6 o 2.412 2.775 3 o 7 2.0 3.4 0.0 179.8 179.8 2 Qiojx 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 11 391 -2.9 -5.0-265.2 1.288 0.08 -2.34 21.19 -7.21 5 6 Qiojx 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 12 109 -2.9 -3.9-361.4 1.288 0.08 -1.66 11.62 -8.33 5 6 Qiojz 1 972 1.7 5.0 267.3 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 1.229 0.23 0.08 2.29 19.70-14.53 5 6 Qiojz 3 349 2.0 3.4 383.0 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 1.229 0.24 0.08 1.44 7.46 -6.06 3 6 JNXZ iz ITz FSTz FETz RTRz jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxz YRTz RD Qzx TO NB i/j Qizjx 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 10 213 -2.9 -5.4-427.6 1.229 0.08 -1.39 8.58-10.13 3 6 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -10.132 10 x 6 o 2.412 2.775 3 o 7 2.0 3.4 0.0 179.8 179.8 2 Qizjx 6 25 2.4 2.8 611.1 11 391 -2.9 -5.0-265.2 1.229 0.08 -2.24 20.80-17.60 4 6 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 3 o 3x10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x10o 3 11 12 13 14 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 3 0.0 179.8 179.8 10 0.0 179.8 179.8 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 2 108.14 106.73 107.03 0.0103 0.0029 -41 5 108.68 107.82 108.49 0.0018 0.0062 -41 6 591.99 621.41 611.08 0.0317 0.0168 -40 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 4.964 1 -5.398 10 9.000 0.092 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 5.0 -5.4 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 1 32 4.96 0 4.10 6.01 Admit k 8 1 1 32 4.96 0 Add k 8 1 1 -32 0 267.3 297.0 43 7 jj OK j 9 10 32 5.40 8 4.46 6.53 Admit k 9 10 10 32 -5.40 8 Add k 9 10 10 -32 8-427.6-447.8 5 0 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 223.65425 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.964 -5.398 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 2 1.64 108.14 176.8 0 -41 2 5 -2.49 -108.68 270.6 0 -41 3 1 1.70 227.11 387.1 32 0 4 7 -2.59 -216.70 560.3 0 -200 5 3 1.98 341.09 674.2 0 0 6 11 -2.89 -251.79 726.6 0 0 7 12 -2.92 -329.21 962.0 0 0 8 4 2.07 472.91 980.5 0 -200 9 10 -2.95 -396.00 1167.8 32 0 10 6 2.41 591.99 1427.8 0 -40 11 9 -3.05 -536.66 1634.4 0 -200 12 8 2.68 741.34 1989.1 0 -699 13 13 5.08 484.20 2458.4 0 -112 14 14 -5.28 -701.08 3700.9 0 -112 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.7046 1.000E+00 2 2 1.6351 -2.087E-02 3 3 1.9766 1.138E-01 4 5 1.4898 -6.574E-02 5 6 2.4119 -6.018E-10 6 10 1.9952 4.571E-01 7 11 1.9269 4.208E-02 8 12 1.9663 2.872E-05 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 5 1.4898 -6.574E-02 2 2 1.6351 -2.087E-02 3 1 1.7046 1.000E+00 4 11 1.9269 4.208E-02 5 12 1.9663 2.872E-05 6 3 1.9766 1.138E-01 7 10 1.9952 4.571E-01 8 6 2.4119 -6.018E-10 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -5 1.4898 3.0216 -6.574E-02 0 -41 2 2 1.6351 2.4409 -2.087E-02 0 -41 3 1 1.7046 4.9637 1.000E+00 64 0 4 -11 1.9269 4.0786 4.208E-02 0 0 5 -12 1.9663 3.0320 2.872E-05 0 0 6 3 1.9766 3.4090 1.138E-01 0 0 7 -10 1.9952 4.5280 4.571E-01 32 0 8 6 2.4119 2.7750 -6.018E-10 0 -40 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 3 1 1.000E+00 j 4 11 4.208E-02 j 5 12 2.872E-05 j 7 10 4.571E-01 M 7 3 o -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 2 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 IGj: 0 0 SrtFS 1.70 1.98 SrtFE 4.96 3.41 MANy= 64 62 NIXy= 0 0 ITRy= 972 349 XYTy= 7.5 12.3 RTRy= 267.3 383.0 BWjj=0.83050.3650 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 3 MAN= 64 62 FST= 1.70 1.98 FET= 4.96 3.41 RST= 227.1 341.1 RET= 328.4 419.9 RTR= 267.3 383.0 XYT= 7.5 12.3 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 21.7019 -0.1857 0.1857 102.58 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 0 -10 8 1 0.00 1.80 -5.79 -397.0 -466.1 4.96 0.00 4.96 0 -11 8 2 0.00 1.83 -5.04 -252.6 -291.0 4.96 0.00 4.96 0 -12 8 3 0.00 1.92 -4.34 -324.3 -379.1 4.96 0.00 4.96 64 1 0 4 1 4.87 1.70 4.96 212.8 359.2 4.96 0.00 4.96 64 3 0 5 2 4.87 1.98 3.41 337.5 445.5 4.96 0.00 4.96 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6345 4.9637 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-08-11 1542UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 223.65425 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=102.6 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 5.670 (±0.026) MHz, Height 289.0 (± 0.9) km. ScaleHt 46.3 (± 0.3) km SlabT 66.2 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 21.3664 223.8903 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 4.9637 5.3976 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 4.9637 278.9436 28.0 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.7455 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 1008.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7463 216.3688 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 198.9379 1.8394 4.2 21.6 21.6 4.9 -4.5 43.1 0.393 19.7 11.8 -9.9 41.7 16 211.5442 2.0139 -0.2 15.5 5.5 4.3 -4.1 36.1 0.506 4.3 11.9 -5.4 34.4 33 224.9492 2.3649 3.2 22.2 4.5 4.6 -3.4 37.3 0.476 3.5 13.1 -4.4 35.3 53 239.2037 3.3608 2.2 24.9 4.8 3.2 -2.8 40.5 0.545 3.9 12.1 -4.0 38.8 105 254.3616 4.4385 4.8 30.4 4.4 3.0 -2.2 43.0 0.519 3.6 12.8 -3.2 41.2 148 270.4800 4.8995 4.5 28.8 3.6 2.9 -2.0 48.4 0.522 2.9 14.0 -2.9 46.5 158 287.6196 4.9084 4.5 28.8 3.6 2.9 -2.0 48.4 0.522 2.9 14.0 -2.9 46.5 158 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 223.65425 0.000 0.00 0.00 4.964 278.94 28.03 1.359 2.416 3.775 1.777 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3636 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 223.65425 999 7.5 16.5 -4.6 2.4 2.7 26.6 33.9 -3.8 7.2 3.8 25.7 RIQ.11111111 223.65425 998 4.4 14.2 -6.9 2.4 -2.8 25.6 63.2 -7.4 7.6 -0.9 24.5 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00002 0.00019 0.00054 0.00105 0.41154 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00001 0.00010 0.00027 0.00053 0.44480 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 10 4 0.00003 0.00030 0.00082 0.00162 0.24662 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 11 4 0.00002 0.00020 0.00055 0.00108 0.08113 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 11 12 4 0.00001 0.00013 0.00036 0.00071 0.48546 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 12 DSND organized 3491 total echoes, or 96.0%; in 14 traces; of which DSND selected 2034 useful echoes, or 55.9%; in 5 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 972 1 3526 1.70 4.96 2.96 1.77 0.00 0.00 227 328 267 2 1 32 -7 26 56 7 0 0 187 94 57 17 64 0 3 349 166 2784 1.98 3.41 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 341 420 383 5 -10 69 -7 48 45 3 0 11 18 55 94 14 62 0 11 391 1459 3507 -2.89 -4.96 -3.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 -252 -288 -265 1 5 31 -7 23 62 5 -2 5 1 26 62 17 62 0 12 109 1515 3193 -2.92 -3.94 -3.34 -2.98 0.00 0.00 -329 -370 -361 3 27 51 -7 30 46 3 0 8 -131 20 110 13 62 0 10 213 1423 3634 -2.95 -5.40 -3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 -396 -450 -428 2 -6 57 -5 70 53 5 11 6 15 21 90 14 62 0 POL rejected 9 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 317 2 974 1.64 2.44 2.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 108 107 107 1 -7 22 5 16 46 2 3 9 5 -33 88 13 -41 0 5 356 623 3150 -2.49 -3.93 -3.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 -109 -108 -108 2 -5 25 3 14 52 3 1 6 -9 4 75 15 -41 0 7 105 936 2734 -2.59 -3.21 -2.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 -217 -215 -216 3 -20 41 19 26 46 3 -2 11 -6 -3 100 14 -200 0 4 411 357 3525 2.07 4.79 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 473 621 543 3 5 79 -64 66 49 5 -2 8 31 79 83 15 -200 0 6 25 777 1779 2.41 2.78 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 592 621 611 11 -84 83 -108 66 40 2 -4 6 153 41 124 14 -40 0 9 162 1327 3480 -3.05 -4.66 -3.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 -537 -558 -538 7 43 74 -33 51 50 5 -2 9 0 50 101 14 -200 0 8 31 1013 1831 2.68 2.98 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 741 760 743 2 46 231 -90 57 43 3 -6 9 59 61 110 14 -699 0 13 22 3490 3598 5.08 5.34 5.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 484 496 489 10 31 15 15 17 60 5 79 161 38 -107 131 17 -112 0 14 28 3504 3627 -5.28 -5.56 -5.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 -701 -746 -716 20 43 28 -9 20 54 3 -140 166 55 259 182 11 -112 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-08-11 1542UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 223.65425 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/08/11 at 15:48:19.8; *********************** MMAX= 3636: DSND normal termination