Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 19.9519 LT Hour= 1.9519 CosCHI=-.4983 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 81 STARTT=1269287827 UT_dDAY= 81.83133 LT_sDAY= 80.83133 FILNM = [TK03221957] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-22 1957UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 81.83133 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/03/22 begin at 19:57:52.8 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5977 3362 506 0 0 1889 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 81.83133 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3362 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 64 9; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.970 DSND organized 3260 total echoes, or 97.0%; in 9 traces; of which DSND selected 3260 useful echoes, or 97.0%; in 9 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 6 197 1387 3017 0.00 0.00 -3.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -595 8 -17 60 92 108 44 3 -11 10 0 0 101 14 0 0 5 317 924 3293 0.00 0.00 -3.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -296 2 -61 41 -37 39 47 4 -3 9 0 0 103 13 0 0 8 25 3079 3284 0.00 0.00 -4.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -741 7 -26 14 98 109 42 3 -6 6 0 0 120 13 0 0 7 104 1694 2770 0.00 0.00 -3.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -556 3 -152 38 -87 75 43 3 -6 7 0 0 115 12 0 0 1 1226 1 2864 0.00 0.00 2.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 311 7 -2 45 54 56 54 7 -8 7 0 0 56 16 0 0 2 401 313 2888 0.00 0.00 2.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 613 12 19 75 48 83 42 4 -7 28 0 0 85 15 0 0 4 293 720 2607 0.00 0.00 2.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 296 3 -15 31 -33 34 49 5 -7 27 0 0 63 15 0 0 3 666 354 3319 0.00 0.00 -3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -329 5 -18 30 79 51 59 6 -14 5 0 0 61 15 0 0 9 31 3227 3312 0.00 0.00 -4.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -588 22 -17 24 25 57 49 4 -57 4 0 0 84 14 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6288 3.5166 264.23 491.08-22.6730******** 2 2.0154 3.2528 543.98 695.70 54.2441152.4346 3 -2.0793 -4.3709 -290.63 -510.16-63.9171 93.0823 4 2.2510 3.2786 267.58 344.31 51.2213188.0557 5 -2.4843 -4.3327 -266.51 -415.22 -5.2913654.5263 6 -2.6824 -3.7455 -564.56 -653.32158.7114199.9176 7 -2.9401 -3.4452 -547.19 -587.62 48.8243 9.7096 8 -4.0849 -4.2951 -727.52 -705.84**************** 9 -4.3512 -4.4029 -586.53 -585.40******** 55.3275 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -6 7 3017 2770 -3.75 -2.94-653.3-547.2 200 49 197 104 -7 9 2770 3312 -3.45 -4.35-587.6-586.5 10 -136 301 31 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 9 7 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0.68 0.66 0 0.54 0 0 0 2 1.00 0.45 0 0.81 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.83 0 0.81 0.09 0.74 4 1.00 0.97 0 0.37 0 0 0 5 0 0 1.00 0 0.67 0.11 0.89 6 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 0.08 1.00 7 0 0 0.98 0 0.96 0.12 0.62 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3260.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0.38 0.68 0 0.60 0 0 0 2 0.32 0.12 0 0.43 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.20 0 0.58 0 0.42 4 0.40 0.57 0 0.09 0 0 0 5 0 0 0.42 0 0.10 0 0.33 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 7 0 0 0.58 0 0.67 0 0.10 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 310.908 613.071 0.014 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 1226 1.6 3.5 310.9 2 401 2.0 3.3 613.1 17.5 291.2 579.6 1.000 -200 -2 17 -2 2 3 6 329.122 741.088 0.118 2 3 7 329.122 590.142 0.109 A12M 3 666 -2.1 -4.4-329.1 7 332 -2.7 -4.4-590.1 12.0 294.6 567.6 1.000 -200 -2 15 -7 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 7 332 -2.7 -4.4-590.1 6 25 -4.1 -4.3-741.1 -117 2 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 1226 1.6 3.5 310.9 3 666 -2.1 -4.4-329.1 2.201 0.43 -0.93 0.21-21.29 37 1 Qiojx 1 1226 1.6 3.5 310.9 5 317 -2.5 -4.3-296.5 2.159 0.43 -1.01 2.65-86.17 33 1 Qiojx 4 293 2.3 3.3 295.6 3 666 -2.1 -4.4-329.1 1.517 0.15 -0.88 0.04170.00 19 4 Aiojx 4 2.2 299.1 3 3.4-338.8 1.517 0.15 -0.88 0.04170.00 19 -4 AZOXo: [o 4x 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 509.99 509.99 AZOXx: [x 3o 4] TOz,o,x= 0.00 509.99 509.99 Qiojx 4 293 2.3 3.3 295.6 5 317 -2.5 -4.3-296.5 1.517 0.15 -0.95 1.23-24.00 16 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -24.000 4 o 5 x 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 3 JNOZ io ITo FSTo FETo RTo jz ITz FSTz FETz RTz BWzo YRTo YRTz RD Qoz TO NB i/j Qiojz 1 1226 1.6 3.5 310.9 4 293 2.3 3.3 295.6 1.211 0.43 0.15 0.74 5.14-34.82 11 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -34.825 4 o 4 x 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 2 JNXZ iz ITz FSTz FETz RTRz jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxz YRTz RD Qzx TO NB i/j Qizjx 4 293 2.3 3.3 295.6 3 666 -2.1 -4.4-329.1 1.314 0.15 -0.71 2.40-19.65 9 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -19.650 4 o 4 o 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -19.650 4 o 4 x 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -19.650 4 z 3 x 2.944 3.481 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -19.650 3 x 4 o 2.251 3.279 4 o 7 2.3 3.3 0.0 510.0 510.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -19.650 4 o 3 x 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 3 Qizjx 4 293 2.3 3.3 295.6 5 317 -2.5 -4.3-296.5 1.188 0.15 -0.78 1.44 -2.94 6 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.939 4 o 4 o 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.939 4 o 4 x 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.939 4 z 5 x 2.944 3.442 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.939 4 o 5 x 2.251 3.279 3 x 7 1.0 3.5 0.0 510.0 510.0 3 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 3 x 3o 4 4 o 4x 3 5 6 7 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 3 0.0 510.0 510.0 4 0.0 510.0 510.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 3.599 1 -4.421 5 9.000 0.019 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 3.6 -4.4 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 1 32 3.60 0 2.97 4.35 Admit k 8 1 1 32 3.52 0 Add k 8 1 1 -32 0 310.9 384.2 120 49 Admit k 8 1 4 0 3.28 0 Add k 8 1 4 0 0 295.6 323.7 29 50 Result j 8 1 32 81 6 3.31 49 jj OK j 9 5 32 4.42 19 3.65 5.35 Admit k 9 5 3 0 -4.37 19 Add k 9 5 3 0 19-329.1-387.0 53 15 Admit k 9 5 5 32 -4.33 19 Add k 9 5 5 -32 19-296.5-351.4 14 17 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 81.83133 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 3.352 0.1072 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.599 -4.421 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.63 264.23 430.4 32 0 2 4 2.25 267.58 602.3 0 0 3 3 -2.08 -290.63 604.3 0 0 4 5 -2.48 -266.51 662.1 32 0 5 2 2.02 543.98 1096.3 0 -200 6 7 -2.68 -564.56 1514.4 0 -200 7 6 -4.08 -727.52 2971.8 0 -117 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 3o 4] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6288 1.727E-02 2 3 0.9993 1.000E+00 3 4 2.2510 4.916E-01 4 5 1.4830 1.218E-04 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 3 0.9993 1.000E+00 2 5 1.4830 1.218E-04 3 1 1.6288 1.727E-02 4 4 2.2510 4.916E-01 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -3 0.9993 3.4808 1.000E+00 63 0 2 -5 1.4830 3.4415 1.218E-04 32 0 3 1 1.6288 3.5166 1.727E-02 32 0 4 4 2.2510 3.2786 4.916E-01 64 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 3 1.000E+00 M 1 4 o j 2 5 1.218E-04 -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 2 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 4 IGj: 19 19 SrtFS 1.63 2.25 SrtFE 3.52 3.28 MANy= 32 64 NIXy= 0 0 ITRy= 1226 293 XYTy= 54.1 35.7 RTRy= 310.9 295.6 BWjj=0.68050.3704 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 4 MAN= 32 64 FST= 1.63 2.25 FET= 3.52 3.28 RST= 264.2 267.6 RET= 491.1 344.3 RTR= 310.9 295.6 XYT= 54.1 35.7 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 1.9519 -0.4983 1.5017 159.99 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 49 1 19 1 1 3.32 1.63 3.52 266.6 530.3 3.35 0.00 3.35 50 4 19 2 2 3.39 2.25 3.28 266.7 370.7 3.35 0.00 3.35 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6227 3.3901 4 3.3901 3.3517 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-22 1957UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 81.83133 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=160.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 3.682 (±0.405) MHz, Height 311.5 (±15.3) km. ScaleHt-47.0 (± 7.9) km SlabT 66.8 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 1.6164 82.0674 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 3.5988 4.4213 0.0000 0.0000 3.3517 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 3.3517 276.9252 26.0 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 5.4477 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 820.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.2614 107.6277 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 211.5442 1.6819 8.8 8.6 -1.7 4.8 -4.0 5.5 0.738 -2.7 4.0 -3.5 6.1 7 224.9492 2.1057 -5.8 10.2 -8.0 3.9 -4.9 8.4 0.733 -9.0 3.5 -2.7 8.6 80 239.2037 2.5397 -6.0 9.5 -10.2 4.9 -6.1 30.4 0.801 -11.5 5.0 -3.2 30.4 124 254.3616 2.9771 -9.8 23.2 -9.8 5.8 -6.5 41.8 0.828 -11.2 6.8 -3.7 41.6 156 270.4800 3.3207 -17.7 27.1 -10.0 5.5 -6.7 38.6 0.836 -11.4 6.3 -3.9 38.4 181 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 81.83133 0.000 0.00 0.00 3.352 276.93 25.99 0.673 1.021 1.695 1.517 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3362 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 81.83133 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 81.83133 998 -40.0 30.1 -23.8 4.4 -12.0 15.0 84.5 -26.1 4.1 -5.4 15.1 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00030 0.00273 0.00759 0.01487 0.17740 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00062 0.00559 0.01553 0.03044 0.13738 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00001 0.00013 0.00035 0.00069 0.17013 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 5 4 0.00002 0.00021 0.00058 0.00114 0.31102 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 DSND organized 3260 total echoes, or 97.0%; in 7 traces; of which DSND selected 2502 useful echoes, or 74.4%; in 4 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 1226 1 2864 1.63 3.52 2.43 0.00 3.60 0.00 264 491 311 7 -2 45 54 56 54 7 -8 7 -23 1293 56 16 32 0 4 293 720 2607 2.25 3.28 2.78 0.00 3.49 0.00 268 344 296 3 -15 31 -33 34 49 5 -7 27 51 188 63 15 64 0 3 666 354 3319 -2.08 -4.37 -3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 -291 -510 -329 5 -18 30 79 51 59 6 -14 5 -64 93 61 15 63 0 5 317 924 3293 -2.48 -4.33 -3.27 0.00 -4.42 0.00 -267 -415 -296 2 -61 41 -37 39 47 4 -3 9 -5 655 103 13 62 0 POL rejected 3 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 401 313 2888 2.02 3.25 2.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 544 696 613 12 19 75 48 83 42 4 -7 28 54 152 85 15 -200 0 7 332 1387 3312 -2.68 -4.40 -3.24 -2.61 0.00 0.00 -565 -585 -590 15 -27 63 50 100 44 3 -18 10 159 55 103 14 -200 0 6 25 3079 3284 -4.08 -4.30 -4.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 -728 -706 -741 7 -26 14 98 109 42 3 -6 6 -532 -198 120 13 -117 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-22 1957UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 81.83133 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/03/22 at 20:01:38.7; *********************** MMAX= 3362: DSND normal termination