Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 2.7019 LT Hour= 8.7019 CosCHI=0.3212 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 82 STARTT=1269312127 UT_dDAY= 82.11258 LT_sDAY= 82.11258 FILNM = [TK03230242] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-23 0242UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 82.11258 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/03/23 begin at 02:42:55.0 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 6703 3775 623 0 0 2003 1 512 16.5 782.5 7 4 82.11258 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3775 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 67 11; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.966 DSND organized 3646 total echoes, or 96.6%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 3646 useful echoes, or 96.6%; in 11 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 7 657 1145 3491 0.00 0.00 4.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 498 5 -30 51 -39 45 45 6 1 10 0 0 61 17 0 0 6 157 808 1742 0.00 0.00 -3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -117 2 -21 29 4 18 43 5 1 10 0 0 72 16 0 0 10 197 1808 3027 0.00 0.00 4.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 724 3 -52 54 -93 65 39 4 5 6 0 0 83 14 0 0 9 471 1803 3723 0.00 0.00 -5.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -265 1 -33 29 -10 18 51 7 -2 8 0 0 51 18 0 0 8 26 1394 1728 0.00 0.00 3.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 672 3 5 70 -66 141 38 2 2 12 0 0 91 15 0 0 1 491 1 705 0.00 0.00 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 111 1 -19 19 0 13 47 5 7 10 0 0 48 19 0 0 2 308 157 1214 0.00 0.00 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 238 4 -9 49 -12 36 39 2 6 13 0 0 91 14 0 0 5 209 803 1437 0.00 0.00 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 428 8 -32 68 -28 41 41 4 10 15 0 0 77 15 0 0 4 917 747 3421 0.00 0.00 3.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 244 2 -8 13 -12 18 54 7 1 3 0 0 33 17 0 0 3 28 706 742 0.00 0.00 2.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 151 1 2 0 5 1 47 5 8 4 0 0 43 16 0 0 11 185 2328 3726 0.00 0.00 -6.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -546 3 -66 72 -8 24 42 4 1 3 0 0 67 15 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.2683 2.4483 105.95 130.24 0.7509 -7.6543 2 1.8633 2.9073 218.93 240.15 19.1185******** 3 2.5194 2.5436 141.56 138.13******** -0.8666 4 2.6226 5.8542 218.34 303.77********133.7503 5 2.7684 3.0654 432.98 428.91185.1295210.1843 6 -2.8532 -3.3512 -114.86 -127.81 9.2463 79.8488 7 2.9429 5.8910 459.67 575.45******** -3.6130 8 3.1817 3.3133 670.60 678.96 20.7694 40.6205 9 -3.7635 -6.8779 -247.66 -335.18 4.3174247.4356 10 3.7972 5.2409 714.25 758.32 42.7025 27.2612 11 -4.9517 -6.8721 -515.75 -658.17 1.1544406.8083 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -5 7 1437 3491 3.07 2.94 428.9 459.7 210 -284 209 657 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 11 10 -------------------------------------- Break E/Es at cusp --------------- j is ie fis fie JBWX TBWX TBFR TBWj ixR FxR HxR 1 1 705 1.1491 2.4799 1 0.7339 0.7339 0.2103 3 706 742 1.1491 2.4799 1 0.7339 0.0003 0.0043 1 705 2.4799 132.86 BreakE cusp: 1 2.4191 128.92 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.21 0.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.56 0.19 0.02 0.27 0 0.13 0 0 0 0 3 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.09 0 0.58 0 0.95 0.04 0 0.45 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0.04 0 0.99 0 0.56 0.04 0 0.46 0 7 0 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 0.02 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.56 0 0.62 9 0 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 0 0.26 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 0.34 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3646.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.13 0.54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.46 0.08 0 0.22 0 0.38 0 0 0 0 3 0 1.00 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.78 0 0.25 0 0.53 0.59 0 0.66 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.04 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0.62 0 0.47 0 0.24 0.62 0 0.62 0 7 0 0 0 0.41 0 0.38 0.01 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.13 0 0.81 9 0 0 0 0.34 0 0.38 0 0 0.05 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.19 0 0.05 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0 2 0 3 9 0 4 5 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 5 0 10 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 110.949 238.347 0.071 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 491 1.3 2.4 110.9 2 308 1.9 2.9 238.3 7.5 112.9 215.7 0.028 -200 -2 7 -2 2 4 6 243.511 489.694 0.005 A12M 4 917 2.6 5.9 243.5 6 866 2.8 5.9 489.7 52.5 240.3 473.8 1.000 -200 -2 33 -6 3 4 7 243.511 671.805 0.084 3 4 9 243.511 724.085 0.009 A12M 4 917 2.6 5.9 243.5 9 197 3.8 5.2 724.1 22.5 211.4 622.5 1.000 -300 -3 19 -9 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 9 197 3.8 5.2 724.1 7 26 3.2 3.3 671.8 -113 3 2 8 10 264.790 545.639 0.030 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 7 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 670.60 678.96 671.81 RELsr, RELer = 0.0018 0.0106; TOL = 0.030 PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -1 491 1.268 2.448 110.9 -4 917 2.710 5.854 243.5 0.262 1 491 1.268 2.448 110.9 4 917 2.710 5.854 243.5 0.262 2.58 -5 157-2.853-3.351-117.3 -8 471-3.764-6.878-264.8 0.412 5 157-2.853-3.351-117.3 8 471-3.764-6.878-264.8 0.412 -3.56 JNZO: Is j z//o? RD=Rz/Ro~.94; build TO; if>8 make new jz: JNZO j ISTj IETj ITRj FSTj FETj RTRj YRTj YRTz RD Qoz CJG TO NB jz ISTz IETz ITRz FSTz FETz RTRz Qjzo 2 157 1214 308 1.9 2.9 238.35 -4.08 1.80 0.89 0.18 2.00 5.29 7 Qjzo 9 1808 3027 197 3.8 5.2 724.09 -26.78 -89.50 0.98 0.50 4.50 11.02 6 Ajzo 9 2251 3027 162 4.4 5.2 731.4 11 1808 2215 35 3.8 4.0 710.5 AZOXo: [o 9z11] TOz,o,x= 11.02 11.02 0.00 AZOXz: [z11o 9] TOz,o,x= 11.02 11.02 0.00 End JNZO; old, new JMAX = 10 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 491 1.3 2.4 110.9 5 157 -2.9 -3.4-117.3 1.456 0.26 -0.97 2.43-18.71 14 1 Qiojx 4 917 2.6 5.9 243.5 8 471 -3.8 -6.9-264.8 2.291 0.21 -0.93 0.42****** 60 4 Aiojx 4 2.6 245.8 8 5.9-263.4 2.291 0.21 -0.93 0.42****** 60 -4 AZOXo: [o 4x 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 3148.74 3148.74 AZOXx: [x 8o 4] TOz,o,x= 0.00 3148.74 3148.74 Qiojx 4 917 2.6 5.9 243.5 10 185 -5.0 -6.9-545.6 1.709 0.21 -0.48 6.72-45.56 23 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -45.560 4 o 10 x 4.075 5.854 8 x 7 2.9 6.0 0.0 3148.7 3148.7 3 Qiojx 11 35 3.8 4.0 710.5 8 471 -3.8 -6.9-264.8 1.202 0.04 -2.77 26.75-13.23 8 11 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -13.228 8 x 11 o 3.786 4.041 4 o 7 2.6 5.9 0.0 3148.7 3148.7 2 Qiojx 11 35 3.8 4.0 710.5 10 185 -5.0 -6.9-545.6 1.202 0.04 -1.38 6.98 -1.91 2 11 Qiojz 4 917 2.6 5.9 243.5 11 35 3.8 4.0 710.5 1.170 0.21 0.04 2.94 27.89-19.80 8 11 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -19.799 11 z 4 o 4.515 4.774 9 o 7 4.4 5.2 11.0 11.0 0.0 1 JNXZ iz ITz FSTz FETz RTRz jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxz YRTz RD Qzx TO NB i/j Qizjx 11 35 3.8 4.0 710.5 8 471 -3.8 -6.9-264.8 1.170 0.04 -2.75 27.63-42.71 8 11 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -42.709 8 x 11 o 3.786 4.041 4 o 7 2.6 5.9 0.0 3148.7 3148.7 2 Qizjx 11 35 3.8 4.0 710.5 10 185 -5.0 -6.9-545.6 1.170 0.04 -1.38 8.21-26.21 6 11 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 3 4 o 4x 8 5 6 7 8 x 8o 4 9 o 9z11 10 11 z11o 9 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 4 0.0 3148.7 3148.7 8 0.0 3148.7 3148.7 9 11.0 11.0 0.0 11 11.0 11.0 0.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 11 714.04 714.39 710.51 0.0050 0.0054 -40 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -1 491 1.268 2.448 110.9 -4 917 2.710 5.854 243.5 0.262 1 491 1.268 2.448 110.9 4 917 2.710 5.854 243.5 0.262 2.58 -5 157-2.853-3.351-117.3 -8 471-3.764-6.878-264.8 0.412 5 157-2.853-3.351-117.3 8 471-3.764-6.878-264.8 0.412 -3.56 QPNOX: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 -88.000 0 -3.557 5 88.000 0 88.000 0 -3.557 8 JEFSE: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 2.480 1 -3.557 5 88.000 0 2.710 4 -3.557 8 MANIX: FZE IEZ FOE IEO FXE IEX DOZ IFZ DOX IFO DXZ IFX 0.000 0 2.595 1 -3.557 5 2.595 0 0.044 4 1.958 8 sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 1 4 5 8 0 0 0 2.5950 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 6.146 4 -7.017 8 9.000 0.003 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 1 4 5 8 0 4 8 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 2.595 -3.557 0.0 6.1 -7.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 3 1 18 2.60 0 2.14 3.14 Admit k 3 1 1 18 2.45 0 Add k 3 1 1 -18 0 110.9 119.1 20 2 jj OK j 4 4 32 2.60 0 2.14 3.14 Admit k 4 4 3 0 2.54 0 Add k 4 4 3 0 0 150.6 140.3 8 1 Admit k 4 4 4 32 5.85 0 Add k 4 4 4 -32 0 243.5 220.7 71 15 Result j 4 4 32 28 4 2.75 14 jj OK j 5 5 2 3.56 19 2.94 4.30 Admit k 5 5 5 2 -3.35 19 Add k 5 5 5 -2 19-117.3-119.9 24 1 jj OK j 6 8 32 3.56 19 2.94 4.30 Admit k 6 8 8 32 -6.88 19 Add k 6 8 8 -32 19-264.8-247.9 9 0 jj OK j 8 4 32 6.15 19 5.08 7.44 Admit k 8 4 4 32 5.85 19 Add k 8 4 4 -32 19 243.5 272.4 33 5 jj OK j 9 8 32 7.02 19 5.80 8.49 Admit k 9 8 8 32 -6.88 19 Add k 9 8 8 -32 19-264.8-291.1 30 4 Admit k 9 8 10 0 -6.87 19 Add k 9 8 10 0 19-545.6-588.5 30 9 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 82.11258 0.000 0.0000 2.774 0.0876 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 2.595 -3.557 0.000 6.146 -7.017 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.27 105.95 134.4 32 0 2 5 -2.85 -114.86 327.7 2 0 3 3 2.52 141.56 356.6 0 0 4 2 1.86 218.93 407.9 0 -200 5 4 2.62 218.34 572.6 32 0 6 8 -3.76 -247.66 932.1 32 0 7 6 2.77 432.98 1198.6 0 -200 8 7 3.18 670.60 2133.6 0 -699 9 10 -4.95 -515.75 2553.9 0 0 10 11 3.79 714.04 2703.1 0 -40 11 9 4.37 714.88 3121.6 0 -300 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 4x 8] JQ, k, M, C = 4 4 4o JQ, k, M, C = 4 7 8x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.2683 8.031E-05 2 3 2.5194 4.264E-05 3 4 2.6226 1.000E+00 4 5 1.8917 5.347E-07 5 8 2.8541 2.646E-02 6 10 4.0745 2.230E-08 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 1 1.2683 8.031E-05 2 5 1.8917 5.347E-07 3 3 2.5194 4.264E-05 4 4 2.6226 1.000E+00 5 8 2.8541 2.646E-02 6 10 4.0745 2.230E-08 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 1 1.2683 2.4483 8.031E-05 32 0 2 -5 1.8917 2.4232 5.347E-07 2 0 3 3 2.5194 2.5436 4.264E-05 0 0 4 4 2.6226 5.8542 1.000E+00 64 0 5 -8 2.8541 6.0256 2.646E-02 63 0 6 -10 4.0745 6.0198 2.230E-08 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 1 8.031E-05 k 4 4 1.000E+00 M 1 8 x j 3 3 4.264E-05 -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 3 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 4 IGj: 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.27 2.52 2.62 SrtFE 2.45 2.54 5.85 MANy= 62 62 64 NIXy= 0 0 0 ITRy= 491 28 917 XYTy= 18.7 5.0 14.2 RTRy= 110.9 150.6 243.5 BWjj=0.21030.00430.5761 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 1 3 4 MAN= 62 62 64 FST= 1.27 2.52 2.62 FET= 2.45 2.54 5.85 RST= 105.9 141.6 218.3 RET= 130.2 138.1 303.8 RTR= 110.9 150.6 243.5 XYT= 18.7 5.0 14.2 Daytime START = 90.00 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 40 1 19 1 1 2.46 1.15 2.45 105.9 130.2 2.60 2.60 6.15 42 3 19 2 2 2.54 2.49 2.54 141.6 138.1 2.60 2.60 6.15 43 put FOE=FLO= 2.595 99 4 19 3 3 5.94 2.62 5.85 226.9 316.4 6.14 2.60 6.15 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.2218 2.5093 3 2.5093 2.5950 4 2.6217 6.1462 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-23 0242UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 82.11258 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START= 90.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.592 (±0.168) MHz, Height 112.1 (± 1.3) km. ScaleHt -8.4 (± 1.2) km SlabT 10.5 km 2 Iter. Valley 6.2 km wide, 0.03 MHz deep. devn 4.06 km. 7 terms fit 7 O + 0 X + 4. hx= 119.1 PEAK 6.252 (±0.039) MHz, Height 230.6 (± 1.3) km. ScaleHt 37.9 (± 0.9) km SlabT 63.7 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 8.3664 82.3486 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 2.5950 3.5574 6.1462 7.0168 2.7739 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 6.1462 225.5548 28.4 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.9870 0.8766 0.5558 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 1206.0000 7.0967 181.5938 5.1596 202.1608 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 95.1734 1.4271 12.1 21.7 -22.9 11.1 18.7 44.4 0.407 -17.2 14.2 24.0 43.5 5 101.2043 2.0887 -2.1 65.1 42.7 9.5 1.9 111.3 0.400 41.7 33.8 -9.3 106.5 52 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 12 107.6174 2.5620 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 12 114.4369 2.5629 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 121.6885 2.6530 13.0 68.1 9.2 4.8 10.3 98.8 0.441 11.6 25.1 7.5 95.7 3 129.3996 2.8243 -50.2 43.4 17.5 2.9 3.1 38.2 0.685 17.7 11.2 -1.6 36.6 24 137.5994 2.9544 -35.7 61.4 33.5 3.4 4.1 47.5 0.644 33.4 14.7 -4.7 45.3 35 146.3187 3.1993 -11.8 112.6 36.2 3.7 3.9 81.2 0.671 35.9 23.2 -5.6 77.9 47 155.5906 3.4849 -3.7 98.6 17.5 3.3 4.1 86.6 0.734 18.0 23.8 -0.6 83.4 60 165.4501 3.7801 -8.5 85.2 8.8 3.3 3.7 80.6 0.767 9.5 22.4 1.3 77.4 76 175.9342 4.2249 -2.7 78.0 11.0 2.8 3.6 71.5 0.789 11.6 19.8 0.6 68.7 94 187.0828 4.8164 -2.2 94.8 8.7 2.4 3.3 58.5 0.799 9.2 16.2 0.9 56.2 115 198.9379 5.4432 -4.8 97.4 8.3 3.0 3.0 79.0 0.781 8.8 22.6 0.7 75.7 135 211.5442 5.9116 -4.1 86.2 5.2 4.1 2.4 153.1 0.801 5.7 43.2 0.9 147.0 151 224.9492 6.1436 -4.1 86.2 5.2 4.1 2.4 153.1 0.801 5.7 43.2 0.9 147.0 151 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 82.11258 2.595 111.09 9.70 6.146 225.55 28.43 2.766 3.757 6.522 1.358 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3775 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 3 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 82.11258 999 0.7 20.7 -0.9 6.8 -0.4 71.4 41.2 -1.0 22.8 -0.2 68.0 RIQ.11111100 82.11258 998 -10.8 38.6 12.5 2.0 3.9 43.9 86.7 13.0 11.8 0.5 42.3 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00001 0.00001 0.44151 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.12430 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00008 0.00071 0.00198 0.00388 0.28688 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 5 4 0.00001 0.00008 0.00021 0.00041 0.68873 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 8 4 0.00003 0.00031 0.00087 0.00170 0.22797 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 10 4 0.00002 0.00021 0.00058 0.00113 0.14008 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 DSND organized 3646 total echoes, or 96.6%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 2249 useful echoes, or 59.6%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 491 1 705 1.27 2.45 1.93 0.00 0.00 2.58 106 130 111 1 -19 19 0 13 47 5 7 10 1 -8 48 19 62 0 5 157 808 1742 -2.85 -3.35 -3.13 0.00 0.00 -3.56 -115 -128 -117 2 -21 17 4 9 43 5 1 9 9 80 72 16 2 0 3 28 706 742 2.52 2.54 2.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 142 138 151 1 2 0 5 1 47 5 8 4 -288 -1 43 16 62 0 4 917 747 3421 2.62 5.85 3.93 2.71 6.15 2.58 218 304 244 2 -8 13 -12 18 54 7 1 3 -109 134 33 17 64 0 8 471 1803 3723 -3.76 -6.88 -5.33 0.00 -7.02 -3.56 -248 -335 -265 1 -33 29 -10 18 51 7 -2 8 4 247 51 18 63 0 10 185 2328 3726 -4.95 -6.87 -6.16 0.00 -7.05 0.00 -516 -658 -546 3 -66 72 -8 24 42 4 1 3 1 407 67 15 0 0 POL rejected 5 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 308 157 1214 1.86 2.91 2.37 0.00 3.28 0.00 219 240 238 4 -9 49 -12 36 39 2 6 13 19 -143 91 14 -200 0 6 866 803 3491 2.77 5.89 3.95 2.88 0.00 0.00 433 575 490 5 -32 54 -27 44 44 6 2 11 185 -4 65 17 -200 0 7 26 1394 1728 3.18 3.31 3.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 671 679 672 3 5 70 -66 141 38 2 2 12 21 41 91 15 -699 0 11 35 1808 2215 3.79 4.04 3.90 0.00 -7.05 0.00 714 714 711 2 -69 54 -154 77 36 3 11 6 48 -10 97 14 -40 0 9 162 2251 3027 4.37 5.24 4.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 715 758 731 3 -31 54 -48 65 40 4 1 7 18 27 81 14 -300 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-23 0242UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 82.11258 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/03/23 at 02:47:56.6; *********************** MMAX= 3775: DSND normal termination