Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 12.9519 LT Hour= 18.9519 CosCHI=-.0569 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 82 STARTT=1269349027 UT_dDAY= 82.53967 LT_sDAY= 82.53967 FILNM = [TK03231257] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-23 1257UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 82.53967 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/03/23 begin at 12:57:51.1 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 7313 4538 597 0 0 1774 1 512 16.5 782.5 5 3 82.53967 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 4538 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 45 9; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.986 DSND organized 4476 total echoes, or 98.6%; in 9 traces; of which DSND selected 4476 useful echoes, or 98.6%; in 9 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 6 665 1552 4519 0.00 0.00 -4.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -253 1 -25 21 -8 20 58 7 -1 4 0 0 44 18 0 0 5 29 1135 1676 0.00 0.00 -2.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -103 2 4 19 -13 45 38 2 7 8 0 0 110 13 0 0 8 189 2684 4078 0.00 0.00 -4.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -724 2 -60 50 -44 114 53 5 -2 3 0 0 54 16 0 0 7 460 1977 4523 0.00 0.00 -4.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -506 2 -60 43 -4 41 54 6 -2 3 0 0 47 17 0 0 1 1160 1 4314 0.00 0.00 2.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 244 1 -8 21 -8 25 57 6 -1 3 0 0 33 17 0 0 2 989 12 4049 0.00 0.00 2.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 470 2 -9 49 -17 56 55 5 -3 4 0 0 33 17 0 0 4 933 39 3604 0.00 0.00 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 683 2 -23 63 -6 74 55 7 -5 5 0 0 33 18 0 0 3 25 25 221 0.00 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 101 1 -13 6 -18 7 38 2 -12 20 0 0 111 13 0 0 9 26 4176 4280 0.00 0.00 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 672 11 -10 69 28 61 46 4 -3 6 0 0 80 13 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.5936 5.1693 216.40 391.46-14.9618659.4673 2 1.6164 4.6596 431.72 558.95-50.0275174.5399 3 1.6422 1.6928 104.95 105.42136.8941 47.2734 4 1.6543 4.1543 645.76 760.94-44.2119 78.0889 5 -2.4007 -2.5212 -102.10 -104.12 44.2163 -6.4085 6 -2.6222 -5.7421 -262.35 -306.35-70.2838153.2445 7 -3.0197 -5.7399 -484.34 -609.68-57.9620260.7852 8 -3.6760 -4.6743 -712.19 -751.09 3.2171 68.3980 9 5.0816 5.1175 683.77 708.39701.4004639.2164 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs NO Trace Consolidations; JMAX= 9 -------------------------------------- Break E/Es at cusp --------------- j is ie fis fie JBWX TBWX TBFR TBWj ixR FxR HxR 3 25 221 1.6183 1.7176 3 0.0018 0.0018 0.0122 3 93 1.6508 110.03 BreakE cusp: 3 1.6590 109.39 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.86 0.85 0.01 0.70 0 0 0 0 0.01 2 1.00 0.73 0.02 0.82 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.76 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.60 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0.87 0.32 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.66 0.37 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.24 0 9 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 4476.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.26 0.53 0 0.47 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.47 0.22 0 0.43 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.00 1.00 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.53 0.57 1.00 0.21 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.15 0.56 0.60 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0.44 0.10 0.55 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.40 0.45 0.04 0 9 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 243.753 469.881 0.037 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 1160 1.6 5.2 243.8 2 989 1.6 4.7 469.9 44.5 227.2 451.7 1.000 -200 -2 32 -2 3 1 4 243.753 682.546 0.069 A12M 1 1160 1.6 5.2 243.8 4 933 1.7 4.2 682.5 45.0 222.8 670.8 0.007 -300 -3 26 -4 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 4 933 1.7 4.2 682.5 9 26 5.1 5.1 671.9 -112 3 2 6 7 252.755 505.990 0.001 A12M 6 665 -2.6 -5.7-252.8 7 460 -3.0 -5.7-506.0 36.5 248.2 491.7 0.007 -200 -2 29 -7 3 6 8 252.755 724.104 0.046 A12M 6 665 -2.6 -5.7-252.8 8 189 -3.7 -4.7-724.1 15.5 181.5 543.6 0.017 -300 -3 15 -8 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 1160 1.6 5.2 243.8 5 29 -2.4 -2.5-102.6 1.184 0.23 -2.08 18.01 -4.00 4 1 Qiojx 1 1160 1.6 5.2 243.8 6 665 -2.6 -5.7-252.8 3.053 0.23 -0.94 1.07 42.60 60 1 Aiojx 1 1.6 236.8 6 4.9-251.3 3.053 0.23 -0.94 1.07 42.60 60 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 6] TOz,o,x= 0.00 127.81 127.81 AZOXx: [x 6o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 127.81 127.81 Qiojx 3 25 1.6 1.7 100.7 5 29 -2.4 -2.5-102.6 1.046 0.08 -1.03 2.97 -2.62 2 3 Qiojx 3 25 1.6 1.7 100.7 6 665 -2.6 -5.7-252.8 1.061 0.08 -0.41 5.65 -3.33 2 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -3.328 6 x 3 o 1.642 1.693 1 o 7 1.6 5.2 0.0 127.8 127.8 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 6 2 3 4 5 6 x 6o 1 7 8 9 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 127.8 127.8 6 0.0 127.8 127.8 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 5 102.10 104.12 102.59 0.0048 0.0148 -47 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -3 25 1.642 1.693 100.7 -1 1160 1.594 5.169 243.8 0.099 3 25 1.642 1.693 100.7 1 1160 1.594 5.169 243.8 0.099 1.64 QPNOX: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 -88.000 0 JEFSE: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX 0.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 1.429 1 -2.593 6 MANIX: FZE IEZ FOE IEO FXE IEX DOZ IFZ DOX IFO DXZ IFX 0.000 0 0.000 0 -2.613 0 1.410 0 0.218 1 1.014 6 sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 1.6280 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 5.247 1 -5.931 6 9.000 0.035 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 1 6 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 1.628 -2.613 0.0 5.2 -5.9 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 1 32 5.25 0 4.34 6.35 Admit k 8 1 1 32 5.17 0 Add k 8 1 1 -32 0 243.8 306.4 49 12 jj OK j 9 6 32 5.93 8 4.90 7.18 Admit k 9 6 6 32 -5.74 8 Add k 9 6 6 -32 8-252.8-274.7 38 2 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 82.53967 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 1.628 -2.613 0.000 5.247 -5.931 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 3 1.64 104.95 172.4 0 0 2 5 -2.40 -102.10 245.1 0 -47 3 1 1.59 216.40 344.8 32 0 4 6 -2.62 -262.35 687.9 32 0 5 2 1.62 431.72 697.8 0 -200 6 4 1.65 645.76 1068.3 0 -300 7 7 -3.02 -484.34 1462.6 0 -200 8 8 -3.68 -712.19 2618.0 0 -300 9 9 5.08 683.77 3474.7 0 -112 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 1x 6] JQ, k, M, C = 1 4 1o JQ, k, M, C = 1 7 6x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.5936 1.000E+00 2 3 1.6422 2.721E-08 3 5 1.3873 -9.813E-09 4 6 1.6380 9.690E-02 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 5 1.3873 -9.813E-09 2 1 1.5936 1.000E+00 3 6 1.6380 9.690E-02 4 3 1.6422 2.721E-08 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -5 1.3873 1.5248 -9.813E-09 0 -47 2 1 1.5936 5.1693 1.000E+00 64 0 3 -6 1.6380 4.8775 9.690E-02 63 0 4 3 1.6422 1.6928 2.721E-08 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 2 1 1.000E+00 M 2 6 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 2 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 3 1 IGj: 0 0 SrtFS 1.64 1.59 SrtFE 1.69 5.17 MANy= 0 64 NIXy= 0 0 ITRy= 25 1160 XYTy= 21.9 11.6 RTRy= 100.7 243.8 BWjj=0.01220.8619 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 3 1 MAN= 0 64 FST= 1.64 1.59 FET= 1.69 5.17 RST= 105.0 216.4 RET= 105.4 391.5 RTR= 100.7 243.8 XYT= 21.9 11.6 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 18.9519 -0.0569 0.0569 91.01 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 1 3 0 1 1 1.63 1.62 1.69 105.0 105.4 1.63 1.63 5.25 2 put FOE=FLO= 1.628 23 -6 8 2 1 1.63 -2.59 -5.77 -265.4 -310.9 95 1 0 3 2 5.20 1.59 5.17 217.6 429.3 5.24 1.63 5.25 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 3 1.6264 1.6280 1 1.6426 5.2473 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-23 1257UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 82.53967 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START= 91.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 * FC reduced from 2.303 to 1.613 since next layer starts at 1.643 MHz. PEAK 1.613 (±0.004) MHz, Height 104.7 (± 0.1) km. ScaleHt -5.3 (± 0.0) km SlabT 7.5 km 13 Iter. Valley 43.3 km wide, 0.76 MHz deep. devn 0.97 km. 13 terms fit 10 O +20 X + 4. hx= 156.4 PEAK 5.282 (±0.012) MHz, Height 248.0 (± 0.5) km. ScaleHt 37.1 (± 0.7) km SlabT 55.0 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 18.6164 82.7757 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 1.6280 2.6132 5.2473 5.9311 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 5.2473 255.7487 32.8 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 1.0000 1.0000 0.8868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 1164.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6719 214.7524 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 187.0828 1.7440 8.8 20.3 0.9 5.2 -3.6 9.0 0.798 -0.1 5.7 -3.7 8.7 15 198.9379 2.4532 5.6 41.4 4.6 5.0 -2.6 51.6 0.713 3.7 16.4 -3.6 49.2 74 211.5442 3.6137 6.4 75.1 1.5 4.1 -1.9 48.2 0.631 1.0 14.9 -2.2 46.0 140 224.9492 4.5552 8.9 73.8 0.5 3.8 -1.7 47.7 0.605 0.0 14.5 -1.7 45.6 170 239.2037 5.0515 10.8 75.4 -1.6 3.5 -1.7 48.4 0.610 -2.0 14.4 -1.2 46.4 182 254.3616 5.2402 10.4 72.0 0.6 3.3 -1.9 49.0 0.631 0.1 14.3 -2.0 46.9 192 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 82.53967 0.000 0.00 0.00 5.247 255.75 32.82 1.576 3.161 4.737 2.006 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 4538 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 3 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 82.53967 999 -3.7 29.6 4.7 9.4 2.8 33.7 55.8 5.3 16.5 1.5 30.9 RIQ.11111100 82.53967 998 -1.3 21.8 -2.4 1.7 -3.6 22.7 68.7 -3.3 6.4 -2.8 21.8 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00005 0.00044 0.00123 0.00241 0.21165 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50187 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 6 4 0.00003 0.00023 0.00063 0.00123 0.24303 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 DSND organized 4476 total echoes, or 98.6%; in 9 traces; of which DSND selected 1850 useful echoes, or 40.8%; in 3 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 3 25 25 221 1.64 1.69 1.67 0.00 0.00 1.64 105 105 101 1 -13 6 -18 7 38 2 -12 20 137 47 111 13 0 0 1 1160 1 4314 1.59 5.17 2.98 0.00 5.25 1.64 216 391 244 1 -8 21 -8 25 57 6 -1 3 -15 659 33 17 64 0 6 665 1552 4519 -2.62 -5.74 -4.07 0.00 -5.93 0.00 -262 -306 -253 1 -25 21 -8 20 58 7 -1 4 -70 153 44 18 63 0 POL rejected 6 multiple- & other traces: NIX 5 29 1135 1676 -2.40 -2.52 -2.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 -102 -104 -103 2 4 19 -13 45 38 2 7 8 44 -6 110 13 -47 0 2 989 12 4049 1.62 4.66 2.74 0.00 5.01 0.00 432 559 470 2 -9 49 -17 56 55 5 -3 4 -50 175 33 17 -200 0 4 933 39 3604 1.65 4.15 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 646 761 683 2 -23 63 -6 74 55 7 -5 5 -44 78 33 18 -300 0 7 460 1977 4523 -3.02 -5.74 -4.20 0.00 -6.01 0.00 -484 -610 -506 2 -60 43 -4 41 54 6 -2 3 -58 261 47 17 -200 0 8 189 2684 4078 -3.68 -4.67 -4.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 -712 -751 -724 2 -60 50 -44 114 53 5 -2 3 3 68 54 16 -300 0 9 26 4176 4280 5.08 5.12 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 684 708 672 11 -10 69 28 61 46 4 -3 6 701 639 80 13 -112 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-23 1257UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 82.53967 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/03/23 at 13:01:56.4; *********************** MMAX= 4538: DSND normal termination