Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 17.2019 LT Hour= 23.2019 CosCHI=-.4953 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 84 STARTT=1269537127 UT_dDAY= 84.71675 LT_sDAY= 84.71675 FILNM = [TK03251712] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1712UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.71675 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/03/25 begin at 17:12:56.6 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 6069 3526 667 0 0 1709 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 84.71675 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3526 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 62 9; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.962 DSND organized 3391 total echoes, or 96.2%; in 9 traces; of which DSND selected 3391 useful echoes, or 96.2%; in 9 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 6 165 1330 3391 0.00 0.00 -3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -596 10 -95 93 6 64 43 4 2 11 0 0 105 13 0 0 5 278 982 2866 0.00 0.00 3.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 623 11 0 97 -70 82 45 5 1 39 0 0 87 14 0 0 8 90 1796 2935 0.00 0.00 3.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 320 11 -66 44 4 34 47 4 41 26 0 0 104 14 0 0 7 57 1743 2994 0.00 0.00 3.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 730 21 -40 31 -64 77 46 3 -50 28 0 0 97 14 0 0 1 1064 2 2999 0.00 0.00 2.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 294 6 -16 37 -12 28 50 6 0 18 0 0 54 17 0 0 2 768 37 3002 0.00 0.00 2.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 560 12 -65 106 9 78 45 5 4 28 0 0 72 15 0 0 4 251 978 2997 0.00 0.00 3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 374 11 -16 24 15 33 45 7 0 52 0 0 80 15 0 0 3 646 523 3495 0.00 0.00 -3.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -302 7 -35 38 -5 38 52 7 0 10 0 0 67 16 0 0 9 72 3291 3492 0.00 0.00 -4.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -437 20 -50 41 -20 38 50 4 -2 5 0 0 77 16 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6698 3.6587 236.64 427.68 39.8401281.1781 2 1.9373 3.5160 495.82 662.60145.7474-74.6273 3 -2.5005 -4.5240 -257.83 -431.45 24.4065428.9907 4 2.7853 3.6294 306.36 463.19141.1805******** 5 2.8414 3.5495 582.14 704.85148.7789 -9.9182 6 -2.9846 -4.3170 -531.36 -742.08 42.2375 79.1524 7 3.2188 3.5310 722.76 739.79 3.4024******** 8 3.1925 3.5197 306.36 353.70414.9344265.8191 9 -4.3494 -4.5250 -416.44 -478.97327.7463******** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -2 7 3002 2994 3.52 3.22 662.6 722.8 -75 3 768 57 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 9 8 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 0.70 0 0.42 0.36 0 0.80 0.16 0 2 0 0.71 0 0 0.66 0 0 0.09 3 1.00 0 0.30 0.84 0 0.88 0.39 0 4 1.00 0 1.00 0.25 0 0.97 0.46 0 5 0 1.00 0 0 0.47 0 0 0 6 1.00 0 0.47 0.43 0 0.56 0.21 0 7 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 0.11 0 8 0 0.99 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3391.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 0.31 0 0.63 0.59 0 0.59 0.61 0 2 0 0.19 0 0 0.72 0 0 0 3 0.37 0 0.07 0.38 0 0.45 0.26 0 4 0.41 0 0.62 0.08 0 0.42 0.55 0 5 0 0.28 0 0 0.05 0 0 0 6 0.41 0 0.55 0.58 0 0.24 0.56 0 7 0.39 0 0.74 0.45 0 0.44 0.03 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 13 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 4 294.485 623.424 0.057 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 1064 1.7 3.7 294.5 4 278 2.8 3.5 623.4 7.0 324.5 617.7 0.175 -200 -2 9 -4 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 4 278 2.8 3.5 623.4 6 825 1.9 3.5 567.8 -113 2 2 2 5 302.138 596.342 0.013 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 1064 1.7 3.7 294.5 2 646 -2.5 -4.5-302.1 2.227 0.22 -0.94 1.64-60.83 37 1 Qiojx 1 1064 1.7 3.7 294.5 5 165 -3.0 -4.3-596.3 1.741 0.22 -0.48 5.35-30.92 17 1 Qiojx 1 1064 1.7 3.7 294.5 8 72 -4.3 -4.5-437.4 1.059 0.22 -0.87 0.35 12.12 3 1 Aiojx 1 3.5 408.5 8 3.7-471.1 1.059 0.22 -0.87 0.35 12.12 3 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 36.37 36.37 AZOXx: [x 8o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 36.37 36.37 Qiojx 3 251 2.8 3.6 374.4 2 646 -2.5 -4.5-302.1 1.336 0.30 -1.04 2.27-18.24 11 3 Qiojx 7 90 3.2 3.5 319.9 2 646 -2.5 -4.5-302.1 1.149 0.27 -0.90 0.33 41.01 8 7 Aiojx 7 3.1 328.2 2 3.6-364.8 1.149 0.27 -0.90 0.33 41.01 8 -7 AZOXo: [o 7x 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 123.04 123.04 AZOXx: [x 2o 7] TOz,o,x= 0.00 123.04 123.04 Qiojx 3 251 2.8 3.6 374.4 5 165 -3.0 -4.3-596.3 1.269 0.30 -0.56 4.80 -3.00 4 3 Qiojx 3 251 2.8 3.6 374.4 8 72 -4.3 -4.5-437.4 1.059 0.30 -0.92 0.84 12.12 3 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 12.124 8 x 3 o 3.459 3.629 1 o 7 1.7 3.7 0.0 36.4 36.4 2 Qiojx 7 90 3.2 3.5 319.9 5 165 -3.0 -4.3-596.3 1.105 0.27 -0.46 5.93 -4.00 4 7 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -4.000 7 o 5 x 3.192 3.425 2 x 7 1.5 3.6 0.0 123.0 123.0 3 Qiojx 7 90 3.2 3.5 319.9 8 72 -4.3 -4.5-437.4 1.047 0.27 -0.74 1.83 -0.50 1 7 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -0.500 7 o 8 x 3.459 3.520 2 x 7 1.5 3.6 0.0 123.0 123.0 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -0.500 8 x 7 o 3.459 3.520 1 o 7 1.7 3.7 0.0 36.4 36.4 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 8 2 x 2o 7 3 4 5 6 7 o 7x 2 8 x 8o 1 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 36.4 36.4 2 0.0 123.0 123.0 7 0.0 123.0 123.0 8 0.0 36.4 36.4 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 4.081 1 -4.543 2 9.000 0.110 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 4.1 0.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 1 16 4.08 0 3.37 4.94 Admit k 8 1 1 16 3.66 0 Add k 8 1 1 -16 0 294.5 373.5 150 77 Admit k 8 1 3 0 3.63 0 Add k 8 1 3 0 0 374.4 444.5 63 120 Admit k 8 1 7 0 3.52 0 Add k 8 1 7 0 0 319.9 337.7 11 121 Result j 8 1 16 121 5 3.51 121 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 84.71675 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 3.500 0.0480 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.081 0.000 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.67 236.64 395.1 16 0 2 2 -2.50 -257.83 644.7 0 0 3 3 2.79 306.36 853.3 0 0 4 6 1.94 495.82 960.5 0 -113 5 7 3.19 306.36 978.1 0 0 6 5 -2.98 -531.36 1585.9 0 0 7 4 2.84 582.14 1654.1 0 -200 8 8 -4.35 -416.44 1811.3 0 0 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 2o 7] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6698 7.669E-01 2 2 1.5014 1.000E+00 3 3 2.7853 8.799E-05 4 5 2.0336 2.799E-06 5 7 3.1925 4.259E-04 6 8 3.4587 8.766E-06 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 2 1.5014 1.000E+00 2 1 1.6698 7.669E-01 3 5 2.0336 2.799E-06 4 3 2.7853 8.799E-05 5 7 3.1925 4.259E-04 6 8 3.4587 8.766E-06 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -2 1.5014 3.6377 1.000E+00 63 0 2 1 1.6698 3.6587 7.669E-01 16 0 3 -5 2.0336 3.4255 2.799E-06 0 0 4 3 2.7853 3.6294 8.799E-05 0 0 5 7 3.1925 3.5197 4.259E-04 64 0 6 -8 3.4587 3.6387 8.766E-06 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 2 1.000E+00 M 1 7 o j 2 1 7.669E-01 M 2 8 x j 4 3 8.799E-05 -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 3 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 7 IGj: 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.67 2.79 3.19 SrtFE 3.66 3.63 3.52 MANy= 62 62 64 NIXy= 0 0 0 ITRy= 1064 251 90 XYTy= 20.2 21.9 66.2 RTRy= 294.5 374.4 319.9 BWjj=0.69660.29560.1146 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 1 3 7 MAN= 62 62 64 FST= 1.67 2.79 3.19 FET= 3.66 3.63 3.52 RST= 236.6 306.4 306.4 RET= 427.7 463.2 353.7 RTR= 294.5 374.4 319.9 XYT= 20.2 21.9 66.2 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 23.2019 -0.4953 0.4953 154.77 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 50 1 19 1 1 3.47 1.67 3.66 235.8 421.4 3.50 0.00 3.50 51 3 19 2 2 3.50 2.79 3.63 305.4 485.6 3.50 0.00 3.50 52 7 19 3 3 3.52 3.19 3.52 267.3 380.4 3.50 0.00 3.50 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6518 3.4997 3 3.4997 3.5216 7 3.5216 3.5002 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1712UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.71675 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=154.8 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 3.732 (±0.233) MHz, Height 288.7 (±10.9) km. ScaleHt-45.6 (± 7.1) km SlabT 62.1 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 22.8664 84.9528 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 4.0815 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.5002 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 3.5002 276.0845 21.2 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8407 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 1027.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4927 205.1320 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 224.9492 1.9442 4.0 18.0 -29.5 7.1 -2.3 87.4 0.312 -29.1 23.0 5.4 84.6 22 239.2037 2.6321 61.9 64.4 -4.6 8.0 -2.5 122.6 0.499 -5.1 36.1 -1.3 117.4 78 254.3616 3.0903 35.6 64.8 -0.1 6.4 -2.5 88.4 0.525 -0.7 26.4 -2.4 84.6 115 270.4800 3.4643 -19.1 92.7 -1.8 8.0 -3.0 115.7 0.537 -2.5 34.2 -2.4 110.8 157 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 84.71675 0.000 0.00 0.00 3.500 276.08 21.16 0.633 0.907 1.540 1.433 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3526 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 84.71675 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 84.71675 998 -22.7 36.2 0.6 2.5 -3.8 41.2 66.3 -0.4 11.5 -3.8 39.6 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00004 0.00036 0.00100 0.00196 0.29532 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00005 0.00042 0.00118 0.00231 0.19904 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 3 4 0.00006 0.00050 0.00140 0.00274 0.47201 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 5 4 0.00021 0.00193 0.00535 0.01049 0.46696 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 7 4 0.00013 0.00119 0.00329 0.00646 0.38272 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 8 4 0.00006 0.00054 0.00149 0.00293 0.13159 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 DSND organized 3391 total echoes, or 96.2%; in 8 traces; of which DSND selected 2288 useful echoes, or 64.9%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 1064 2 2999 1.67 3.66 2.73 0.00 4.08 0.00 237 428 294 6 -16 37 -12 28 50 6 0 0 40 281 54 17 62 0 2 646 523 3495 -2.50 -4.52 -3.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 -258 -431 -302 6 -35 37 -5 29 52 7 0 9 24 429 67 16 63 0 3 251 978 2997 2.79 3.63 3.21 0.00 3.57 0.00 306 463 374 11 -16 24 15 33 45 7 0 52 141 -214 80 15 62 0 7 90 1796 2935 3.19 3.52 3.35 3.03 3.04 0.00 306 354 320 11 -66 44 4 34 47 4 41 26 415 266 104 14 64 0 5 165 1330 3391 -2.98 -4.32 -3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 -531 -742 -596 10 -95 93 6 64 43 4 2 11 42 79 105 13 0 0 8 72 3291 3492 -4.35 -4.52 -4.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 -416 -479 -437 20 -50 41 -20 38 50 4 -2 5 328 -198 77 16 62 0 POL rejected 2 multiple- & other traces: NIX 6 825 37 2994 1.94 3.53 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 496 740 568 19 -64 102 11 86 45 5 3 32 146 -106 73 15 -113 0 4 278 982 2866 2.84 3.55 3.26 3.27 0.00 0.00 582 705 623 11 0 97 -70 82 45 5 1 39 149 -10 87 14 -200 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1712UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.71675 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/03/25 at 17:16:30.9; *********************** MMAX= 3526: DSND normal termination