Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 19.7019 LT Hour= 1.7019 CosCHI=-.4930 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 84 STARTT=1269546127 UT_dDAY= 84.82092 LT_sDAY= 83.82092 FILNM = [TK03251942] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1942UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.82092 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/03/25 begin at 19:42:57.0 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 6177 3433 909 0 0 1892 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 84.82092 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3433 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 73 13; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.955 DSND organized 3278 total echoes, or 95.5%; in 13 traces; of which DSND selected 3278 useful echoes, or 95.5%; in 13 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 8 236 1488 3267 0.00 0.00 -2.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -704 17 -72 97 -34 102 41 4 -7 13 0 0 87 14 0 0 7 155 1066 2154 0.00 0.00 2.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 587 29 48 74 -140 130 41 3 -2 12 0 0 96 14 0 0 12 115 2716 3336 0.00 0.00 -3.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -552 18 5 63 -92 101 44 3 -7 8 0 0 94 13 0 0 11 48 2622 3329 0.00 0.00 -3.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -404 12 -147 53 -1 67 43 3 3 7 0 0 105 13 0 0 10 279 2234 3337 0.00 0.00 -3.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -431 15 -19 54 -105 75 45 5 -2 11 0 0 94 15 0 0 9 25 1524 2103 0.00 0.00 2.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 391 7 -150 50 70 65 38 3 -2 11 0 0 131 13 0 0 1 582 2 2063 0.00 0.00 2.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 669 15 -72 101 -8 93 43 4 -4 13 0 0 75 15 0 0 2 642 30 2156 0.00 0.00 2.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 368 12 -44 60 15 42 46 4 -3 12 0 0 61 15 0 0 6 45 971 1400 0.00 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 487 22 75 69 -218 87 41 3 0 9 0 0 106 13 0 0 5 131 802 1982 0.00 0.00 2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 390 11 -26 95 86 39 42 8 -39 14 0 0 83 15 0 0 4 629 752 3276 0.00 0.00 -3.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -358 7 -37 46 -5 51 49 6 -2 8 0 0 58 16 0 0 3 330 500 2153 0.00 0.00 2.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 442 16 -15 60 -23 62 41 3 -3 11 0 0 87 14 0 0 13 61 2814 3335 0.00 0.00 -3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -625 23 17 41 -252 103 41 4 -12 13 0 0 95 15 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6319 2.5674 592.72 737.35******** 17.5684 2 1.7151 2.7044 299.12 513.63 71.7532393.7316 3 2.2016 2.7396 359.46 567.58 36.5965 79.2978 4 -2.4220 -3.4414 -324.13 -484.34 -5.3131284.9600 5 2.4248 2.6515 372.61 461.61252.3471179.6451 6 2.4742 2.5124 470.40 504.35197.6262-18.6346 7 2.4985 2.7802 573.44 611.57**************** 8 -2.7091 -3.2817 -674.10 -743.37********-87.2101 9 2.6137 2.7192 397.55 429.91289.7894579.0096 10 -2.9390 -3.4903 -371.94 -525.83-47.2351******** 11 -3.3834 -3.4488 -427.37 -446.69317.2281389.8825 12 -3.3113 -3.4718 -530.93 -591.15653.2972******** 13 -3.3836 -3.4743 -630.29 -659.46508.5724******** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -2 6 2156 1400 2.70 2.47 513.6 470.4 394 198 642 45 -4 11 3276 3329 -3.44 -3.38-484.3-427.4 285 317 629 48 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 13 11 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0.50 0.39 0.15 0.85 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.68 0.29 0.42 0.58 0.45 0 0.20 0 0 0 0 3 0.63 1.00 0.12 0.39 0.68 0 0.17 0 0 0 0 4 1.00 0.39 0.11 0.43 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.24 0.86 0.54 0.05 0.15 0 0.37 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.31 0 0.60 1.00 0 0 7 0 1.00 0.36 0 1.00 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.62 0 0.30 0.92 0.29 0.16 9 0 0 0 0 0 0.56 0 0.50 0.55 0.13 0.06 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.86 0.09 0.55 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.72 0.97 0.05 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3278.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0.18 0.42 0.35 0.53 0.21 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.58 0.10 0.46 0.54 0.46 0 0.44 0 0 0 0 3 0.65 0.54 0.04 0.63 0.36 0 0.40 0 0 0 0 4 0.47 0.46 0.37 0.21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.79 0.54 0.64 1.00 0.05 0 0.41 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 0 0.43 0 0 7 0 0.56 0.60 0 0.59 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0.57 0 0 0.21 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 10 7 0 6 0 7 6 0 8 0 9 0 10 16 0 11 5 11 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 2 1 442.194 668.566 0.278 2 3 1 390.230 668.566 0.154 2 3 5 390.230 587.199 0.283 2 4 1 333.275 668.566 0.003 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 4 687 1.7 2.5 333.3 1 582 1.6 2.6 668.6 6.5 326.9 637.0 0.162 -200 -2 9 -1 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 1 582 1.6 2.6 668.6 5 155 2.5 2.8 587.2 -112 2 2 8 6 430.601 704.200 0.201 2 9 6 357.575 704.200 0.015 A12M 9 677 -2.4 -3.4-357.6 6 236 -2.7 -3.3-704.2 6.0 318.6 604.8 0.245 -200 -2 9 -6 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 6 236 -2.7 -3.3-704.2 10 115 -3.3 -3.5-551.6 -113 2 Prox 6 236 -2.7 -3.3-704.2 11 61 -3.4 -3.5-625.4 -113 2 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 2 330 2.2 2.7 442.2 8 279 -2.9 -3.5-430.6 1.226 0.21 -0.91 3.22 34.79 10 2 Aiojx 2 2.2 432.3 8 2.6-475.0 1.226 0.21 -0.91 3.22 34.79 10 -2 AZOXo: [o 2x 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 104.36 104.36 AZOXx: [x 8o 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 104.36 104.36 Qiojx 2 330 2.2 2.7 442.2 9 677 -2.4 -3.4-357.6 1.192 0.21 -0.99 4.40-16.50 9 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -16.500 2 o 9 x 2.202 2.526 8 x 7 2.0 2.6 0.0 104.4 104.4 3 Qiojx 3 131 2.4 2.7 390.2 8 279 -2.9 -3.5-430.6 1.121 0.48 -0.79 0.90 18.37 6 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 18.371 8 x 3 o 2.425 2.569 2 o 7 2.2 2.7 0.0 104.4 104.4 2 Qiojx 3 131 2.4 2.7 390.2 9 677 -2.4 -3.4-357.6 1.090 0.48 -0.87 1.50 17.89 5 3 Aiojx 3 2.4 389.9 9 2.6-449.8 1.090 0.48 -0.87 1.50 17.89 5 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 53.67 53.67 AZOXx: [x 9o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 53.67 53.67 Qiojx 4 687 1.7 2.5 333.3 8 279 -2.9 -3.5-430.6 1.310 0.25 -0.84 0.60 72.11 13 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 72.111 8 x 4 o 1.984 2.512 2 o 7 2.2 2.7 0.0 104.4 104.4 2 Qiojx 4 687 1.7 2.5 333.3 9 677 -2.4 -3.4-357.6 1.532 0.25 -0.92 1.70-25.46 18 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -25.456 9 x 4 o 1.715 2.512 3 o 7 2.4 2.7 0.0 53.7 53.7 2 Qiojx 7 25 2.6 2.7 391.4 8 279 -2.9 -3.5-430.6 1.025 0.44 -0.78 0.82 5.66 2 7 Aiojx 7 2.6 400.4 8 2.6-513.2 1.025 0.44 -0.78 0.82 5.66 2 -7 AZOXo: [o 7x 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 16.97 16.97 AZOXx: [x 8o 2o 7] TOz,o,x= 0.00 16.97 121.33 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 o 2x 8 3 o 3x 9 4 5 6 7 o 7x 8 8 x 8o 2o 7 9 x 9o 3 10 11 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 2 0.0 104.4 104.4 3 0.0 53.7 53.7 7 0.0 17.0 17.0 8 0.0 17.0 121.3 9 0.0 53.7 53.7 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.794 2 -3.493 9 9.000 0.083 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.8 -3.5 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 2 32 2.79 0 2.31 3.38 Admit k 8 2 2 32 2.74 0 Add k 8 2 2 -32 0 442.2 497.7 129 57 Admit k 8 2 3 0 2.65 0 Add k 8 2 3 0 0 390.2 423.0 52 76 Admit k 8 2 4 0 2.51 0 Add k 8 2 4 0 0 333.3 412.8 132 144 Admit k 8 2 7 0 2.72 0 Add k 8 2 7 0 0 391.4 412.3 4 144 Result j 8 2 32 170 7 2.54 142 jj OK j 9 9 32 3.49 19 2.89 4.23 Admit k 9 9 8 0 -3.49 19 Add k 9 9 8 0 19-430.6-462.2 124 44 Admit k 9 9 9 32 -3.45 19 Add k 9 9 9 -32 19-357.6-404.7 228 153 Result j 9 9 32 213 16 2.92 294 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 84.82092 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.553 0.0624 3.338 0.0744 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.794 -3.493 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 4 1.72 299.12 513.0 0 0 2 9 -2.42 -324.13 785.0 32 0 3 2 2.20 359.46 791.4 32 0 4 3 2.42 372.61 903.5 0 0 5 1 1.63 592.72 967.3 0 -200 6 7 2.61 397.55 1039.1 0 0 7 8 -2.94 -371.94 1093.1 0 0 8 5 2.50 573.44 1432.7 0 -112 9 10 -3.31 -530.93 1758.1 0 -113 10 6 -2.71 -674.10 1826.2 0 -200 11 11 -3.38 -630.29 2132.6 0 -113 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 9o 3] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 2 2.2016 2.008E-02 2 3 2.4248 1.582E-04 3 4 1.7151 2.176E-03 4 7 2.6137 1.976E-07 5 8 1.9845 3.002E-03 6 9 1.4119 1.000E+00 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 9 1.4119 1.000E+00 2 4 1.7151 2.176E-03 3 8 1.9845 3.002E-03 4 2 2.2016 2.008E-02 5 3 2.4248 1.582E-04 6 7 2.6137 1.976E-07 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -9 1.4119 2.5257 1.000E+00 63 0 2 4 1.7151 2.5124 2.176E-03 0 0 3 -8 1.9845 2.5693 3.002E-03 0 0 4 2 2.2016 2.7396 2.008E-02 32 0 5 3 2.4248 2.6515 1.582E-04 64 0 6 7 2.6137 2.7192 1.976E-07 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 9 1.000E+00 M 1 3 o j 2 4 2.176E-03 j 4 2 2.008E-02 M 4 8 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 4 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 4 2 3 7 IGj: 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.72 2.20 2.42 2.61 SrtFE 2.51 2.74 2.65 2.72 MANy= 62 62 64 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 687 330 131 25 XYTy= 47.9 27.3 89.7 165.4 RTRy= 333.3 442.2 390.2 391.4 BWjj=0.42900.28950.12200.0568 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 4 2 3 MAN= 62 62 64 FST= 1.72 2.20 2.42 FET= 2.51 2.74 2.65 RST= 299.1 359.5 372.6 RET= 504.4 567.6 461.6 RTR= 333.3 442.2 390.2 XYT= 47.9 27.3 89.7 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 1.7019 -0.4930 1.5070 159.96 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 26 4 19 1 1 2.53 1.72 2.51 294.0 482.1 2.55 0.00 2.55 27 2 19 2 2 2.56 2.20 2.74 370.0 589.5 2.55 0.00 2.55 28 3 19 3 3 2.59 2.42 2.65 353.5 464.3 2.55 0.00 2.55 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 4 1.6850 2.5608 2 2.5608 2.5852 3 2.5852 2.5531 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1942UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.82092 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=160.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.684 (±0.238) MHz, Height 320.6 (±16.8) km. ScaleHt-51.6 (±12.8) km SlabT 72.6 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 1.3664 85.0569 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.7936 3.4926 0.0000 0.0000 2.5531 3.3381 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.5531 289.5564 31.1 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 5.7901 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 634.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0684 188.5152 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 239.2037 1.8356 6.7 13.1 50.2 7.2 0.6 47.8 0.405 48.7 14.5 -12.5 46.1 7 254.3616 2.1548 6.4 22.9 19.4 5.4 2.4 34.5 0.410 19.4 11.4 -2.8 33.0 28 270.4800 2.4007 -2.4 46.8 -2.1 4.7 1.5 54.6 0.461 -1.6 14.8 2.0 52.7 49 287.6196 2.5467 -7.1 39.4 0.5 3.5 -0.8 39.2 0.498 0.3 10.0 -0.9 38.1 82 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 84.82092 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.553 289.56 31.10 0.473 0.709 1.183 1.498 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3433 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 7 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 84.82092 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 84.82092 998 -13.0 18.5 3.7 1.8 -4.9 13.7 68.5 2.3 3.7 -5.7 13.3 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 2 4 0.00008 0.00076 0.00212 0.00415 0.23452 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 3 4 0.00002 0.00016 0.00044 0.00087 0.35705 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00002 0.00018 0.00049 0.00096 0.17610 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 7 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.50276 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 8 4 0.00007 0.00061 0.00170 0.00333 0.17209 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 9 4 0.00001 0.00013 0.00037 0.00072 0.14155 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 DSND organized 3278 total echoes, or 95.5%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 2129 useful echoes, or 62.0%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 4 687 30 1400 1.72 2.51 2.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 299 504 333 10 -48 72 -5 51 46 4 -2 12 72 -19 63 16 62 0 9 677 752 3329 -2.42 -3.45 -3.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 -324 -447 -358 7 -38 48 -4 52 48 6 -2 8 -5 390 60 17 63 0 2 330 500 2153 2.20 2.74 2.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 359 568 442 17 -15 59 -23 59 41 3 -3 13 37 79 87 14 62 0 3 131 802 1982 2.42 2.65 2.55 2.67 2.66 0.00 373 462 390 11 -26 95 86 39 42 8 -39 14 252 180 83 15 64 0 7 25 1524 2103 2.61 2.72 2.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 398 430 391 7 -150 50 70 65 38 3 -2 11 290 579 131 13 0 0 8 279 2234 3337 -2.94 -3.49 -3.26 0.00 -3.42 0.00 -372 -526 -431 15 -19 54 -105 75 45 5 -2 11 -47 -218 94 15 62 0 POL rejected 5 multiple- & other traces: NIX 1 582 2 2063 1.63 2.57 2.11 1.62 0.00 0.00 593 737 669 15 -72 101 -8 93 43 4 -4 0 -168 18 75 15 -200 0 5 155 1066 2154 2.50 2.78 2.64 2.95 2.69 0.00 573 612 587 29 48 64 -140 126 41 3 -2 11 2056 -233 96 14 -112 0 10 115 2716 3336 -3.31 -3.47 -3.40 -3.45 -3.43 0.00 -531 -591 -552 18 5 63 -92 101 44 3 -7 8 653 -437 94 13 -113 0 6 236 1488 3267 -2.71 -3.28 -2.99 -2.76 0.00 0.00 -674 -743 -704 17 -72 97 -34 102 41 4 -7 13 -152 -87 87 14 -200 0 11 61 2814 3335 -3.38 -3.47 -3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 -630 -659 -625 23 17 41 -252 103 41 4 -12 13 509 -372 95 15 -113 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1942UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.82092 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/03/25 at 19:46:54.1; *********************** MMAX= 3433: DSND normal termination