Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 19.9519 LT Hour= 1.9519 CosCHI=-.4801 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 84 STARTT=1269547027 UT_dDAY= 84.83133 LT_sDAY= 83.83133 FILNM = [TK03251957] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1957UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.83133 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/03/25 begin at 19:57:56.0 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 4592 2046 860 0 0 1786 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 84.83133 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2046 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 79 11; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.908 DSND organized 1858 total echoes, or 90.8%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 1858 useful echoes, or 90.8%; in 11 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 7 115 946 1571 0.00 0.00 -2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -690 6 -121 146 61 80 43 5 -9 11 0 0 70 16 0 0 6 97 770 1293 0.00 0.00 2.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 595 22 1 107 52 80 41 5 -10 33 0 0 86 15 0 0 10 59 1706 1890 0.00 0.00 -3.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -616 28 118 35 0 112 44 4 -519 8 0 0 98 14 0 0 9 40 1704 1876 0.00 0.00 -3.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -562 21 -68 121 21 51 47 4 -13 15 0 0 69 15 0 0 8 54 1434 1891 0.00 0.00 -3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -430 9 24 54 -204 91 43 4 -6 8 0 0 111 15 0 0 1 620 1 1292 0.00 0.00 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 371 10 -40 64 16 55 44 3 -5 14 0 0 72 15 0 0 2 164 3 463 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 627 9 -121 165 31 79 43 3 -14 13 0 0 80 14 0 0 5 59 726 1190 0.00 0.00 2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 438 26 -17 68 -14 74 44 4 -3 14 0 0 89 14 0 0 4 484 504 1865 0.00 0.00 -2.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -366 8 -53 57 17 42 50 6 -4 7 0 0 49 17 0 0 3 145 323 1282 0.00 0.00 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 722 11 148 148 -85 105 39 3 -18 15 0 0 95 14 0 0 11 21 1992 2035 0.00 0.00 7.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 226 0 29 1 32 5 74 7 1 1 0 0 73 15 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6402 2.6471 298.32 603.63 62.7444 -0.4544 2 1.7136 2.1862 604.47 707.73157.9336372.0129 3 2.1369 2.5919 707.60 716.41320.3748157.0235 4 -2.3037 -3.3438 -327.46 -529.03 -5.7203169.4429 5 2.5134 2.5778 455.27 523.85698.1365533.0462 6 2.4961 2.6126 587.15 627.59 85.5199168.1094 7 -2.6422 -3.0682 -669.92 -758.14105.1171260.5686 8 -3.1127 -3.3369 -423.46 -467.12197.5621-83.1837 9 -3.3279 -3.3601 -572.44 -590.94******** 32.1452 10 -3.3169 -3.4352 -632.84 -635.93********-34.9354 11 7.2713 7.6006 226.06 226.58 -0.3030 1.8066 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -2 3 463 1282 2.19 2.14 707.7 707.6 372 320 164 145 -1 6 1292 1293 2.65 2.50 603.6 587.1 0 86 620 97 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 11 9 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.15 0 0.07 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.17 0 0 0.41 0.22 0.02 0.03 0 3 1.00 0 0.01 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.90 0 0.07 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1.00 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 6 0 1.00 0 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.09 0 7 0 0.49 0 0 0 0.28 0.01 1.00 0 8 0 0.23 0 0 0 0.17 0.27 0.02 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 1858.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.17 0 0.16 0.39 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.26 0 0 0.49 0.88 0 0 0 3 0.84 0 0.03 0.56 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.61 0 0.44 0.39 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.51 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 6 0 0.12 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 12 0 7 8 5 12 0 9 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 2 5 366.114 689.624 0.060 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 2 484 -2.3 -3.3-366.1 5 115 -2.6 -3.1-689.6 5.0 346.6 656.7 0.019 -200 -2 6 -5 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 5 115 -2.6 -3.1-689.6 7 40 -3.3 -3.4-561.9 -113 2 Prox 5 115 -2.6 -3.1-689.6 8 59 -3.3 -3.4-615.7 -113 2 2 4 1 374.393 671.056 0.109 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 309 1.7 2.6 671.1 2 484 -2.3 -3.3-366.1 1.545 0.29 -1.76 7.24-19.36 15 1 Qiojx 1 309 1.7 2.6 671.1 6 54 -3.1 -3.3-430.2 1.299 0.29 -1.62 9.15-11.07 10 1 Qiojx 3 59 2.5 2.6 438.4 2 484 -2.3 -3.3-366.1 1.023 0.23 -0.89 0.77 2.00 1 3 Aiojx 3 2.4 461.3 2 2.5-520.0 1.023 0.23 -0.89 0.77 2.00 1 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 6.00 6.00 AZOXx: [x 2o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 6.00 6.00 Qiojx 4 717 1.6 2.6 374.4 2 484 -2.3 -3.3-366.1 1.545 0.31 -0.90 2.77 21.21 18 4 Aiojx 4 1.6 359.3 2 2.5-398.5 1.545 0.31 -0.90 2.77 21.21 18 -4 AZOXo: [o 4x 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 63.64 63.64 AZOXx: [x 2o 3o 4] TOz,o,x= 0.00 63.64 69.64 Qiojx 3 59 2.5 2.6 438.4 6 54 -3.1 -3.3-430.2 1.045 0.23 -1.05 3.75 -1.41 2 3 Qiojx 4 717 1.6 2.6 374.4 6 54 -3.1 -3.3-430.2 1.299 0.31 -0.90 5.17 51.41 11 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 51.408 4 o 6 x 2.171 2.408 2 x 7 1.3 2.4 0.0 63.6 69.6 3 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 x 2o 3o 4 3 o 3x 2 4 o 4x 2 5 6 7 8 9 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 2 0.0 63.6 69.6 3 0.0 6.0 6.0 4 0.0 63.6 63.6 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.573 4 -3.435 2 9.000 0.024 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.6 -3.4 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 4 32 2.57 0 2.13 3.11 Admit k 8 4 1 0 2.59 0 Add k 8 4 1 0 0 671.1 713.5 63 23 Admit k 8 4 3 0 2.58 0 Add k 8 4 3 0 0 438.4 494.0 16 26 Admit k 8 4 4 32 2.61 0 Add k 8 4 4 -32 0 374.4 494.0 210 136 Result j 8 4 32 270 6 2.51 135 jj OK j 9 2 32 3.44 19 2.84 4.16 Admit k 9 2 2 32 -3.34 19 Add k 9 2 2 -32 19-366.1-411.5 69 21 Admit k 9 2 6 0 -3.34 19 Add k 9 2 6 0 19-430.2-451.3 15 27 Result j 9 2 32 54 10 2.82 162 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 84.83133 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.547 0.0421 3.302 0.0396 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.573 -3.435 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 4 1.64 298.32 489.3 32 0 2 2 -2.30 -327.46 754.4 32 0 3 1 1.71 604.47 1035.8 0 0 4 3 2.51 455.27 1144.3 0 0 5 6 -3.11 -423.46 1318.1 0 0 6 9 7.27 226.06 1643.8 0 0 7 5 -2.64 -669.92 1770.1 0 -200 8 7 -3.33 -572.44 1905.0 0 -113 9 8 -3.32 -632.84 2099.1 0 -113 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 2o 3o 4] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.7136 1.436E-04 2 2 1.2741 1.000E+00 3 3 2.5134 2.075E-05 4 4 1.6402 5.580E-01 5 6 2.1706 5.907E-07 6 9 7.2713 1.944E-01 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 2 1.2741 1.000E+00 2 4 1.6402 5.580E-01 3 1 1.7136 1.436E-04 4 6 2.1706 5.907E-07 5 3 2.5134 2.075E-05 6 9 7.2713 1.944E-01 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -2 1.2741 2.4154 1.000E+00 63 0 2 4 1.6402 2.6126 5.580E-01 32 0 3 1 1.7136 2.5919 1.436E-04 0 0 4 -6 2.1706 2.4081 5.907E-07 0 0 5 3 2.5134 2.5778 2.075E-05 64 0 6 9 7.2713 7.6006 1.944E-01 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 2 4 5.580E-01 M 2 2 x j 3 1 1.436E-04 -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 4 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 4 1 3 9 IGj: 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.64 1.71 2.51 7.27 SrtFE 2.61 2.59 2.58 7.60 MANy= 62 62 64 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 717 309 59 21 XYTy= 44.0 54.6 22.3 43.5 RTRy= 374.4 671.1 438.4 226.0 BWjj=0.16320.14740.01080.0552 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 4 1 3 MAN= 62 62 64 FST= 1.64 1.71 2.51 FET= 2.61 2.59 2.58 RST= 298.3 604.5 455.3 RET= 627.6 716.4 523.8 RTR= 374.4 671.1 438.4 XYT= 44.0 54.6 22.3 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 1.9519 -0.4801 1.5199 159.89 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 29 4 19 1 1 2.53 1.64 2.61 296.3 664.0 2.54 0.00 2.55 30 1 19 2 2 2.56 1.71 2.59 590.6 695.5 2.54 0.00 2.55 31 3 19 3 3 2.58 2.51 2.58 418.9 534.0 2.54 0.00 2.55 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 4 1.6284 2.5603 1 2.5603 2.5762 3 2.5762 2.5474 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1957UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.83133 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=159.9 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.623 (±0.132) MHz, Height 333.8 (±13.6) km. ScaleHt-64.4 (±14.3) km SlabT 84.9 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 1.6164 85.0674 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.5734 3.4352 0.0000 0.0000 2.5474 3.3022 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.5474 328.4130 41.5 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0202 0.8500 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 495.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.9021 153.8684 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 287.6196 2.2138 2.0 17.9 -13.6 4.7 -4.7 54.0 0.575 -14.3 12.4 -1.0 52.7 43 305.8454 2.4444 15.7 33.4 -14.4 6.5 -7.3 71.8 0.564 -15.8 17.9 -3.3 69.9 67 325.2262 2.5396 1.4 45.4 -14.8 7.0 -6.3 77.7 0.552 -15.9 19.3 -2.2 75.6 88 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 84.83133 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.547 328.41 41.48 0.463 0.942 1.405 2.033 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2046 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 9 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 84.83133 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 84.83133 998 2.4 23.2 -4.0 2.6 -8.9 24.8 90.7 -6.2 6.0 -7.6 24.2 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00027 0.00245 0.00680 0.01332 0.43799 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00014 0.00124 0.00344 0.00674 0.08969 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 3 4 0.00006 0.00052 0.00144 0.00283 0.13789 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00007 0.00067 0.00186 0.00365 0.23951 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 6 4 0.00018 0.00166 0.00461 0.00904 0.20990 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 9 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.31722 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 DSND organized 1858 total echoes, or 90.8%; in 9 traces; of which DSND selected 1644 useful echoes, or 80.4%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 4 717 1 1293 1.64 2.61 2.27 0.00 2.57 0.00 298 628 374 12 -40 67 18 57 44 4 -6 16 63 168 74 15 62 0 2 484 504 1865 -2.30 -3.34 -2.87 0.00 -3.44 0.00 -327 -529 -366 9 -53 55 17 40 50 6 -4 7 -6 169 49 17 63 0 1 309 3 1282 1.71 2.59 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 604 716 671 11 -51 145 20 86 41 4 -12 14 158 157 87 14 62 0 3 59 726 1190 2.51 2.58 2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 455 524 438 26 -17 68 -14 74 44 4 -3 14 698 533 89 14 64 0 6 54 1434 1891 -3.11 -3.34 -3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 -423 -467 -430 9 24 54 -204 91 43 4 -6 8 198 -83 111 15 0 0 9 21 1992 2035 7.27 7.60 7.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 227 226 0 29 1 32 5 74 7 1 1 0 2 73 15 0 0 POL rejected 3 multiple- & other traces: NIX 5 115 946 1571 -2.64 -3.07 -2.90 0.00 -3.31 0.00 -670 -758 -690 9 -121 139 61 78 43 5 -9 10 105 261 70 16 -200 0 7 40 1704 1876 -3.33 -3.36 -3.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 -572 -591 -562 21 -68 121 21 51 47 4 -13 15 1048 32 69 15 -113 0 8 59 1706 1890 -3.32 -3.44 -3.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 -633 -636 -616 28 118 35 0 112 44 4 -519 8 1016 -35 98 14 -113 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-25 1957UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 84.83133 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/03/25 at 20:00:37.4; *********************** MMAX= 2046: DSND normal termination