Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 20.9519 LT Hour= 2.9519 CosCHI=-.4009 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 85 STARTT=1269637027 UT_dDAY= 85.87300 LT_sDAY= 84.87300 FILNM = [TK03262057] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-26 2057UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 85.87300 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/03/26 begin at 20:57:57.1 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5340 2682 980 0 0 1465 1 512 16.5 782.5 9 4 85.87300 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2682 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 34 14; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.988 DSND organized 2651 total echoes, or 98.8%; in 14 traces; of which DSND selected 2651 useful echoes, or 98.8%; in 14 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 9 75 1371 1571 0.00 0.00 2.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 533 13 -246 208 -14 97 43 3 3 14 0 0 97 14 0 0 7 207 1249 2292 0.00 0.00 -2.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -667 9 -11 132 -28 69 45 3 2 12 0 0 104 13 0 0 13 56 2471 2652 0.00 0.00 -3.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -549 14 -5 56 -10 11 54 4 17 8 0 0 65 14 0 0 12 91 2361 2668 0.00 0.00 -3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -487 16 -75 98 6 25 52 5 1 8 0 0 75 15 0 0 11 90 2259 2666 0.00 0.00 -3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -375 12 95 90 -48 60 51 4 4 11 0 0 97 14 0 0 10 26 1545 1620 0.00 0.00 2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 642 20 -276 141 40 88 41 2 3 18 0 0 141 12 0 0 1 977 3 1602 0.00 0.00 2.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 327 12 -5 45 2 57 49 4 4 8 0 0 60 15 0 0 8 36 1263 1530 0.00 0.00 2.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 442 4 -144 80 51 36 43 2 -1 8 0 0 100 13 0 0 2 53 10 209 0.00 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 556 5 178 138 -52 81 44 2 9 22 0 0 96 13 0 0 6 93 1039 2227 0.00 0.00 -2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -93 1 -32 16 0 16 40 2 0 20 0 0 154 12 0 0 5 89 956 1610 0.00 0.00 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 371 13 -1 64 -61 50 43 3 -1 8 0 0 84 14 0 0 4 660 854 2628 0.00 0.00 -2.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -340 9 13 61 -42 41 50 6 -1 7 0 0 73 16 0 0 3 172 191 1603 0.00 0.00 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 666 13 -201 149 -55 72 42 3 1 35 0 0 101 14 0 0 14 26 2559 2661 0.00 0.00 -3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -610 19 -143 113 -73 73 45 3 2 5 0 0 113 13 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6222 2.4573 283.79 489.51 58.8399******** 2 1.6465 1.6970 557.81 565.92358.0932507.3579 3 1.7771 2.2863 599.30 744.40190.4075 72.5305 4 -2.2824 -3.2583 -308.20 -458.06 16.9235571.8046 5 2.3062 2.4633 357.11 420.29265.0372607.7015 6 -2.3729 -2.9669 -92.90 -92.02 -1.4958 1.2320 7 -2.5486 -3.0639 -636.40 -751.74 91.6935-40.2134 8 2.4085 2.4459 447.19 477.87527.4976******** 9 2.4409 2.4839 546.65 566.23838.2298******** 10 2.4990 2.5159 664.17 671.13**************** 11 -3.1182 -3.2956 -370.31 -426.44196.3804647.9675 12 -3.1835 -3.2682 -466.26 -505.22**************** 13 -3.2422 -3.2688 -536.74 -560.12********238.8260 14 -3.2665 -3.2862 -616.58 -610.03899.5265******** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -2 3 209 1603 1.70 1.78 565.9 599.3 507 190 53 172 -4 11 2628 2666 -3.26 -3.12-458.1-370.3 572 196 660 90 -12 13 2668 2652 -3.27 -3.24-505.2-536.7 -241 -534 91 56 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 14 11 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0.50 0.77 0.18 0 0 0.04 0.02 0 0 0 0 2 1.00 0.38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.96 0 0.09 0 0 0.24 0.14 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.35 0.70 0 0 0 1.00 0 0 5 0 0 0 0.81 0.31 0 0 0 1.00 0 0 6 1.00 0 1.00 0 0 0.02 0.13 0 0 0 0 7 0.38 0 0.52 0 0 0.12 0.03 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0.59 0.51 0 0 0 0.61 0.08 0.02 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.05 0.03 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.11 0.01 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 2651.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0.37 0.71 0.51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.29 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.49 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.04 0.40 0 0 0 0.20 0 0 5 0 0 0 0.60 0.08 0 0 0 0.38 0 0 6 1.00 0 1.00 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.00 0 1.00 0 0 1.00 0.03 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0.80 0.62 0 0 0 0.28 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 9 12 0 7 9 7 0 8 6 0 9 0 10 8 0 11 10 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 326.547 647.746 0.008 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 977 1.6 2.5 326.5 2 225 1.6 2.3 647.7 10.5 312.8 612.9 1.000 -200 -2 9 -2 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 2 225 1.6 2.3 647.7 7 75 2.4 2.5 532.8 -111 2 Prox 2 225 1.6 2.3 647.7 8 26 2.5 2.5 642.4 -112 2 3 4 9 92.513 345.931 0.219 4 4 9 92.513 345.931 0.067 2 9 5 345.931 667.058 0.037 A12M 9 750 -2.3 -3.3-345.9 5 207 -2.5 -3.1-667.1 8.5 324.5 641.1 1.000 -200 -2 8 -5 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 5 207 -2.5 -3.1-667.1 11 26 -3.3 -3.3-609.8 -113 2 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 11 -699 RST, RET, RTR = -616.58 -610.03 -609.85 RELsr, RELer = 0.0110 0.0003; TOL = 0.030 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 977 1.6 2.5 326.5 4 93 -2.4 -3.0 -92.5 1.379 0.27 -3.31 40.99-17.39 10 1 Qiojx 1 977 1.6 2.5 326.5 9 750 -2.3 -3.3-345.9 1.601 0.27 -0.92 3.09 2.06 17 1 Aiojx 1 1.5 346.9 9 2.4-376.6 1.601 0.27 -0.92 3.09 2.06 17 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 6.18 6.18 AZOXx: [x 9o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 6.18 6.18 Qiojx 1 977 1.6 2.5 326.5 10 147 -3.2 -3.3-491.0 1.061 0.27 -0.79 0.40 12.12 3 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 12.124 1 o 10 x 2.246 2.336 9 x 7 1.2 2.4 0.0 6.2 6.2 3 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 1 4 [o 1x 9] Tzox= 0.00 6.18 6.18 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 1 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [x 9o 1] Tzox= 0.00 6.18 0.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 Aiojx 1 2.2 397.9 10 2.4-505.9 1.061 0.27 -0.79 0.40 12.12 3 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 36.37 36.37 AZOXx: [x10o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 36.37 36.37 Qiojx 3 89 2.3 2.5 370.8 9 750 -2.3 -3.3-345.9 1.066 0.10 -0.85 0.41 9.89 3 3 Aiojx 3 2.3 373.9 9 2.4-439.6 1.066 0.10 -0.85 0.41 9.89 3 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 29.68 29.68 AZOXx: [x 9o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 29.68 29.68 Qiojx 3 89 2.3 2.5 370.8 10 147 -3.2 -3.3-491.0 1.035 0.10 -0.69 1.95 -1.91 2 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -1.914 3 o 10 x 2.306 2.336 9 x 7 1.2 2.4 0.0 29.7 29.7 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -1.914 10 x 3 o 2.306 2.336 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 36.4 36.4 2 Qiojx 6 36 2.4 2.4 442.1 9 750 -2.3 -3.3-345.9 1.014 0.38 -0.98 2.19 -0.50 1 6 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x10 2 3 o 3x 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 x 9o 3 10 x10o 1 11 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 36.4 36.4 3 0.0 29.7 29.7 9 0.0 29.7 29.7 10 0.0 36.4 36.4 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 4 92.90 92.02 92.51 0.0041 0.0053 -38 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.517 3 -3.693 9 9.000 0.099 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.8 -3.7 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 3 32 2.78 0 2.30 3.36 Admit k 8 3 1 0 2.46 0 Add k 8 3 1 0 0 326.5 427.3 185 107 Admit k 8 3 3 32 2.46 0 Add k 8 3 3 -32 0 370.8 383.8 21 109 Admit k 8 3 6 0 2.45 0 Add k 8 3 6 0 0 442.1 463.6 12 114 Result j 8 3 32 114 4 2.37 114 jj OK j 9 9 32 3.69 19 3.05 4.47 Admit k 9 9 9 32 -3.30 19 Add k 9 9 9 -32 19-345.9-403.6 136 60 Admit k 9 9 10 0 -3.27 19 Add k 9 9 10 0 19-491.0-513.8 80 113 Result j 9 9 32 113 9 2.81 227 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 85.87300 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.349 0.0396 3.194 0.0455 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.781 -3.693 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 4 -2.37 -92.90 220.4 0 -38 2 1 1.62 283.79 460.4 0 0 3 9 -2.28 -308.20 703.4 32 0 4 3 2.31 357.11 823.6 32 0 5 2 1.65 557.81 918.4 0 -200 6 6 2.41 447.19 1077.0 0 0 7 7 2.44 546.65 1334.3 0 -111 8 10 -3.18 -466.26 1484.4 0 0 9 5 -2.55 -636.40 1621.9 0 -200 10 8 2.50 664.17 1659.7 0 -112 11 11 -3.27 -616.58 2014.1 0 -699 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 1x10] JQ, k, M, C = 1 4 1o JQ, k, M, C = 1 7 10x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6222 1.000E+00 2 3 2.3062 4.186E-05 3 4 1.3552 -1.135E-03 4 6 2.4085 1.777E-09 5 9 1.2489 9.036E-03 6 10 2.2460 2.426E-05 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 9 1.2489 9.036E-03 2 4 1.3552 -1.135E-03 3 1 1.6222 1.000E+00 4 10 2.2460 2.426E-05 5 3 2.3062 4.186E-05 6 6 2.4085 1.777E-09 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -9 1.2489 2.3646 9.036E-03 32 0 2 -4 1.3552 2.0146 -1.135E-03 0 -38 3 1 1.6222 2.4573 1.000E+00 64 0 4 -10 2.2460 2.3363 2.426E-05 63 0 5 3 2.3062 2.4633 4.186E-05 32 0 6 6 2.4085 2.4459 1.777E-09 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 9 9.036E-03 M 1 3 o j 3 1 1.000E+00 M 3 10 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 3 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 6 IGj: 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.62 2.31 2.41 SrtFE 2.46 2.46 2.45 MANy= 64 62 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 ITRy= 977 89 36 XYTy= 5.8 60.6 152.5 RTRy= 326.5 370.8 442.1 BWjj=0.49900.09390.0224 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 3 MAN= 64 62 FST= 1.62 2.31 FET= 2.46 2.46 RST= 283.8 357.1 RET= 489.5 420.3 RTR= 326.5 370.8 XYT= 5.8 60.6 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 2.9519 -0.4009 1.5991 159.99 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 25 1 19 1 1 2.32 1.62 2.46 276.7 470.3 2.35 0.00 2.35 26 3 19 2 2 2.34 2.31 2.46 349.6 469.8 2.35 0.00 2.35 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6096 2.3354 3 2.3354 2.3491 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-26 2057UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 85.87300 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=160.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.469 (±0.275) MHz, Height 295.5 (±13.9) km. ScaleHt-41.2 (± 9.1) km SlabT 61.7 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 2.6164 86.1090 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.7805 3.6927 0.0000 0.0000 2.3491 3.1944 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.3491 280.1468 25.4 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 6.2016 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 684.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.1251 258.5716 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 224.9492 1.7054 12.6 21.8 40.8 4.4 -5.0 47.7 0.340 38.1 10.7 -15.4 46.7 14 239.2037 1.9077 8.2 25.9 43.8 4.8 -0.5 78.2 0.418 42.2 21.4 -11.9 75.4 51 254.3616 2.1004 1.3 44.4 18.7 5.0 -2.0 54.2 0.455 17.6 15.8 -6.8 52.1 81 270.4800 2.3001 -11.0 39.3 8.7 4.8 -2.7 48.2 0.458 7.7 14.7 -4.8 46.2 120 287.6196 2.3256 -10.1 37.7 8.9 4.7 -2.6 47.1 0.452 7.9 14.3 -4.8 45.2 129 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 85.87300 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.349 280.15 25.43 0.415 0.491 0.906 1.182 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2682 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 4 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 6 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 999 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 85.87300 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111111 85.87300 998 3.5 28.4 -7.4 4.3 -0.3 39.0 48.5 -7.2 12.4 1.6 37.2 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 93, 93 are f<4.3 85.87300 997 0.5 40.5 89.8 14.7 3.8 100.1 55.7 89.76 92.38 94.55 RIQ.11111111 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00001 0.00004 0.00007 0.11467 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00001 0.00007 0.00020 0.00040 0.13922 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 6 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.19105 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 9 4 0.00001 0.00010 0.00027 0.00052 0.12061 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 10 4 0.00001 0.00011 0.00030 0.00058 0.06850 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 DSND organized 2651 total echoes, or 98.8%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 1999 useful echoes, or 74.5%; in 5 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 977 3 1602 1.62 2.46 2.07 0.00 2.44 0.00 284 490 327 12 -5 45 2 57 49 4 4 8 59 -275 60 15 64 0 9 750 854 2666 -2.28 -3.30 -2.84 0.00 -3.69 0.00 -308 -426 -346 11 12 66 -44 45 50 5 0 8 17 648 75 16 62 0 3 89 956 1610 2.31 2.46 2.38 2.58 0.00 0.00 357 420 371 13 -1 91 -61 74 43 3 -1 11 265 608 84 14 62 0 6 36 1263 1530 2.41 2.45 2.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 447 478 442 4 -144 80 51 36 43 2 -1 8 527 1318 100 13 0 0 10 147 2361 2652 -3.18 -3.27 -3.24 -3.10 0.00 0.00 -466 -560 -491 24 -28 124 -12 29 53 4 2 7 -195 239 71 15 63 0 POL rejected 6 multiple- & other traces: NIX 4 93 1039 2227 -2.37 -2.97 -2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 -93 -92 -93 1 -32 16 0 16 40 2 0 20 -1 1 154 12 -38 0 2 225 10 1603 1.65 2.29 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 558 744 648 11 -77 152 -75 72 42 3 2 35 358 73 100 14 -200 0 7 75 1371 1571 2.44 2.48 2.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 547 566 533 13 -246 208 -14 97 43 3 3 14 838 -1223 97 14 -111 0 5 207 1249 2292 -2.55 -3.06 -2.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 -636 -752 -667 9 -11 132 -28 69 45 3 2 12 92 -40 104 13 -200 0 8 26 1545 1620 2.50 2.52 2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 664 671 642 20 -276 141 40 88 41 2 3 18 2911 -453 141 12 -112 0 11 26 2559 2661 -3.27 -3.29 -3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 -617 -610 -610 19 -143 113 -73 73 45 3 2 5 900 -234 113 13 -699 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-26 2057UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 85.87300 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/03/26 at 21:00:44.3; *********************** MMAX= 2682: DSND normal termination