Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 3.4519 LT Hour= 9.4519 CosCHI=0.4477 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 89 STARTT=1269919627 UT_dDAY= 89.14383 LT_sDAY= 89.14383 FILNM = [TK03300327] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111100; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-30 0327UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 89.14383 RIQ.11111100] Today is: 2010/03/30 begin at 03:28:05.5 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 4536 1995 789 0 0 1756 1 512 16.5 782.5 7 4 89.14383 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 1995 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 51 9; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.918 DSND organized 1831 total echoes, or 91.8%; in 9 traces; of which DSND selected 1831 useful echoes, or 91.8%; in 9 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 6 166 1125 1810 0.00 0.00 5.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 598 10 -48 54 -48 68 39 6 -3 7 0 0 82 14 0 0 5 38 970 1611 0.00 0.00 -5.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -547 4 -60 49 -37 58 35 3 2 7 0 0 93 16 0 0 8 44 1800 1934 0.00 0.00 -6.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -456 3 -85 54 -20 37 51 4 -3 4 0 0 66 17 0 0 7 42 1798 1925 0.00 0.00 6.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 517 7 -34 48 29 21 47 8 3 5 0 0 78 15 0 0 1 214 1 217 0.00 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 108 1 -55 33 12 11 44 5 -8 25 0 0 81 14 0 0 2 523 221 1815 0.00 0.00 4.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 275 2 -19 23 -22 23 54 5 -2 2 0 0 36 17 0 0 4 409 351 1977 0.00 0.00 -4.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -269 2 -40 25 -7 23 50 8 -124 4 0 0 51 17 0 0 3 372 223 1729 0.00 0.00 4.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 527 7 -39 49 -14 55 38 3 -1 18 0 0 75 16 0 0 9 23 1941 1976 0.00 0.00 -6.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -305 6 -23 21 -6 27 43 4 186 241 0 0 165 11 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.4289 1.8666 108.31 107.82-21.0869 27.2518 2 3.5765 5.9155 232.11 361.33 92.3105100.0967 3 3.6303 5.7436 472.06 605.81148.6990291.5396 4 -3.8660 -6.3229 -234.14 -290.58 -8.9589 -9.7429 5 -5.1384 -5.5784 -546.50 -562.27 36.3146 28.1805 6 5.1989 5.8252 574.67 661.91 26.9776260.1436 7 6.1444 6.3345 513.26 545.81 43.6089298.3829 8 -6.1960 -6.3828 -459.07 -472.25 55.1976 84.7667 9 -6.7749 -6.9023 -304.31 -305.50 55.9785-71.8707 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -4 9 1977 1976 -6.32 -6.77-290.6-304.3 -10 56 409 23 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 9 8 -------------------------------------- Break E/Es at cusp --------------- j is ie fis fie JBWX TBWX TBFR TBWj ixR FxR HxR 1 1 217 1.3073 1.8781 1 0.1112 0.1112 0.0800 1 192 1.8504 113.41 BreakE cusp: 1 1.4295 108.43 NIX with -55, new Es trace # 9 from old # 1 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 2 0 0.43 0.90 0 0.27 0 0 0 0 3 0 1.00 0.39 0 0.26 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 1.00 0 5 0 1.00 0.87 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 1.00 0 8 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0.06 0.55 0 9 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 1831.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.29 0.58 0 0.51 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.42 0.20 0 0.38 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0.26 0 5 0 0.49 0.62 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0.93 0 8 0 0 0 0.74 0 0 0.08 0.24 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.11 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 7 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 2 3 274.695 527.146 0.041 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 2 523 3.6 5.9 274.7 3 372 3.6 5.7 527.1 19.0 268.8 518.3 0.116 -200 -2 23 -3 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 3 372 3.6 5.7 527.1 5 166 5.2 5.8 598.5 -112 2 2 8 4 271.064 546.754 0.008 2 8 7 271.064 455.557 0.174 PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES JNZO: Is j z//o? RD=Rz/Ro~.94; build TO; if>8 make new jz: JNZO j ISTj IETj ITRj FSTj FETj RTRj YRTj YRTz RD Qoz CJG TO NB jz ISTz IETz ITRz FSTz FETz RTRz Qjzo 2 221 1815 523 3.6 5.9 274.70 -4.14 -1.95 0.96 0.01 12.50 46.77 14 Ajzo 2 758 1815 318 4.3 5.9 287.9 10 221 735 205 3.6 4.2 248.0 AZOXo: [o 2z10] TOz,o,x= 46.77 46.77 0.00 AZOXz: [z10o 2] TOz,o,x= 46.77 46.77 0.00 Qjzo 3 223 1729 372 3.6 5.7 527.15 -8.56 -11.03 0.96 0.37 10.50 36.37 12 Ajzo 3 759 1729 189 4.3 5.7 540.2 11 223 739 183 3.6 4.2 494.6 AZOXo: [o 3z11] TOz,o,x= 36.37 36.37 0.00 AZOXz: [z11o 3] TOz,o,x= 36.37 36.37 0.00 Qjzo 5 1125 1810 166 5.2 5.8 598.48 0.60 -2.31 0.86 1.49 0.00 0.00 2 End JNZO; old, new JMAX = 9 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 2 318 4.3 5.9 287.9 4 38 -5.1 -5.6-546.8 1.126 0.17 -0.47 6.37 -7.07 8 2 Qiojx 2 318 4.3 5.9 287.9 7 44 -6.2 -6.4-455.6 1.098 0.17 -0.65 4.15 -3.67 6 2 Qiojx 2 318 4.3 5.9 287.9 8 432 -3.9 -6.9-271.1 1.381 0.17 -0.98 3.43127.28 18 2 Aiojx 2 4.3 279.9 8 5.9-286.3 1.381 0.17 -0.98 3.43127.28 18 -2 AZOXo: [o 2z10x 8] TOz,o,x= 46.77 428.61 381.84 AZOXx: [x 8o 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 381.84 381.84 Qiojx 10 205 3.6 4.2 248.0 4 38 -5.1 -5.6-546.8 1.129 0.22 -0.48 6.14 -4.90 6 10 Qiojx 11 183 3.6 4.2 494.6 4 38 -5.1 -5.6-546.8 1.129 0.21 -0.95 0.70 31.84 6 11 Aiojx 11 3.8 511.6 4 4.3-537.2 1.129 0.21 -0.95 0.70 31.84 6 -11 AZOXo: [o11x 4] TOz,o,x= 36.37 131.90 95.53 AZOXx: [x 4o11] TOz,o,x= 0.00 95.53 95.53 Qiojx 6 42 6.1 6.3 516.9 8 432 -3.9 -6.9-271.1 1.029 0.32 -1.61 8.70 -0.71 2 6 Qiojx 10 205 3.6 4.2 248.0 8 432 -3.9 -6.9-271.1 1.196 0.22 -0.94 0.43 86.60 12 10 Aiojx 10 3.6 251.1 8 4.3-267.1 1.196 0.22 -0.94 0.43 86.60 12 -10 AZOXo: [o10x 8] TOz,o,x= 46.77 306.58 259.81 AZOXx: [x 8o 2o10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 259.81 641.65 Qiojx 11 183 3.6 4.2 494.6 8 432 -3.9 -6.9-271.1 1.196 0.21 -1.88 13.75-15.59 12 11 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -15.588 8 x 11 o 3.630 4.236 10 o 10 3.6 4.2 46.8 306.6 259.8 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 o 2z10x 8 3 o 3z11 4 x 4o11 5 6 7 8 x 8o 2o10 9 10 o10x 8 11 o11x 4 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 2 46.8 428.6 381.8 3 36.4 36.4 0.0 4 0.0 95.5 95.5 8 0.0 259.8 641.6 10 46.8 306.6 259.8 11 36.4 131.9 95.5 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 4 546.50 562.27 546.75 0.0005 0.0280 -46 7 459.07 472.25 455.56 0.0077 0.0360 -40 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES QPNOX: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 -88.000 0 JEFSE: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX 0.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 4.302 2 -3.762 8 MANIX: FZE IEZ FOE IEO FXE IEX DOZ IFZ DOX IFO DXZ IFX 0.000 0 4.282 0 0.000 0 4.282 0 4.282 2 1.599 0 sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4.2820 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 6.124 2 -6.962 8 9.000 0.002 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 8 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 4.282 0.000 0.0 6.1 -7.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 2 32 6.12 0 5.06 7.41 Admit k 8 2 2 32 5.92 0 Add k 8 2 2 -32 0 287.9 316.2 32 3 jj OK j 9 8 32 6.96 8 5.75 8.42 Admit k 9 8 7 0 -6.38 8 Add k 9 8 7 0 8-455.6-465.1 8 0 Admit k 9 8 8 32 -6.90 8 Add k 9 8 8 -32 8-271.1-291.9 22 1 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 89.14383 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111100 PENEE,F: 0.000 4.282 0.000 0.000 6.124 -6.962 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.43 108.31 154.8 0 0 2 9 1.46 107.45 156.7 0 -55 3 10 3.58 232.11 830.2 0 -11 4 8 -3.87 -234.14 905.2 32 0 5 2 4.33 257.75 1116.5 32 0 6 11 3.63 472.06 1713.7 0 -11 7 3 4.33 510.50 2210.1 0 -200 8 4 -5.14 -546.50 2808.1 0 -46 9 7 -6.20 -459.07 2844.4 0 -40 10 5 5.20 574.67 2987.7 0 -112 11 6 6.14 513.26 3153.7 0 0 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 8o 2o10] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.4289 3.117E-06 2 2 4.3319 2.960E-01 3 4 4.2646 -6.560E-07 4 6 6.1444 1.354E-08 5 7 5.3370 -1.315E-08 6 8 2.9604 1.000E+00 7 10 3.5765 0.000E+00 8 11 3.6303 0.000E+00 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 1 1.4289 3.117E-06 2 8 2.9604 1.000E+00 3 10 3.5765 0.000E+00 4 11 3.6303 0.000E+00 5 4 4.2646 -6.560E-07 6 2 4.3319 2.960E-01 7 7 5.3370 -1.315E-08 8 6 6.1444 1.354E-08 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 1 1.4289 1.8666 3.117E-06 0 0 2 -8 2.9604 6.0502 1.000E+00 63 0 3 10 3.5765 4.2335 0.000E+00 0 -11 4 11 3.6303 4.2362 0.000E+00 0 -11 5 -4 4.2646 4.7116 -6.560E-07 0 -46 6 2 4.3319 5.9155 2.960E-01 64 0 7 -7 5.3370 5.5258 -1.315E-08 0 -40 8 6 6.1444 6.3345 1.354E-08 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 2 8 1.000E+00 M 2 2 o M 2 10 o -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 5 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 10 2 11 6 IGj: 0 0 0 3 0 SrtFS 1.43 3.58 4.33 3.63 6.14 SrtFE 1.87 4.23 5.92 4.24 6.33 MANy= 0 62 64 0 0 NIXy= 0 -11 0 -11 0 ITRy= 10 205 318 183 42 XYTy= 66.3 10.4 38.8 31.4 44.4 RTRy= 108.5 248.0 287.9 494.6 516.9 BWjj=0.08000.00000.42730.00000.0347 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 1 2 6 MAN= 0 64 0 FST= 1.43 4.33 6.14 FET= 1.87 5.92 6.33 RST= 108.3 257.7 513.3 RET= 107.8 361.3 545.8 RTR= 108.5 287.9 516.9 XYT= 66.3 38.8 44.4 Daytime START = 90.00 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 3 1 0 1 1 1.43 1.31 1.87 108.3 107.8 4.28 4.28 6.12 4 put FOE=FLO= 4.282 25 -8 8 2 1 4.28 -3.76 -6.96 -234.8 -293.9 45 2 0 3 2 5.92 4.33 5.92 258.7 367.3 6.12 4.28 6.12 46 6 0 4 3 5.97 6.14 6.33 505.8 579.0 6.12 4.28 6.12 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.3385 4.2820 2 4.3208 5.9694 6 5.9694 6.1243 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-30 0327UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 89.14383 RIQ.11111100 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START= 90.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 1.814 (±0.282) MHz, Height 106.6 (± 3.1) km. ScaleHt -6.0 (± 1.1) km SlabT 10.5 km X ray Weights Reduced to 1/4. 20 Iter. Valley 19.4 km wide, 0.45 MHz deep. devn 0.57 km. 13 terms fit 8 O +21 X + 4. hx= 135.3 21 Iter. Valley 19.4 km wide, 0.11 MHz deep. devn 0.32 km. 13 terms fit 8 O +21 X + 4. hx= 131.0 22 Iter. Valley 19.4 km wide, 0.14 MHz deep. devn 0.32 km. 13 terms fit 8 O +21 X + 4. hx= 128.1 23 Iter. Valley 19.4 km wide, 0.13 MHz deep. devn 0.31 km. 13 terms fit 8 O +21 X + 4. hx= 131.4 PEAK 6.002 (±0.111) MHz, Height 203.7 (± 8.2) km. ScaleHt 44.0 (±17.0) km SlabT 87.4 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 9.1164 89.3799 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 4.2820 0.0000 6.1243 6.9622 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 6.1243 240.2972 24.1 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 1.0000 1.0000 0.8101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 576.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.7256 206.2215 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 187.0828 4.7239 0.7 20.8 2.3 0.9 -1.3 9.7 0.689 1.9 3.0 -1.8 9.3 15 198.9379 5.1741 8.3 17.8 -0.1 0.8 -1.5 15.9 0.738 -0.5 4.6 -1.4 15.3 26 211.5442 5.4991 8.0 14.1 1.0 0.9 -2.2 12.4 0.808 0.4 3.7 -2.4 11.9 36 224.9492 5.8008 5.9 10.8 1.4 0.9 -3.2 9.9 0.860 0.5 3.1 -3.4 9.5 47 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 89.14383 0.000 0.00 0.00 6.124 240.30 24.07 3.434 3.159 6.592 0.920 RIQ.11111100 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 1995 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 999 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 89.14383 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111100 89.14383 998 16.6 367.8 22.2 21.7 1.2 280.2 71.8 21.7 80.8 -4.7 269.2 RIQ.11111100 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.49369 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00016 0.00147 0.00410 0.00803 0.01638 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 6 4 0.00064 0.00575 0.01598 0.03132 0.36554 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 8 4 0.00013 0.00120 0.00333 0.00652 0.08249 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 DSND organized 1831 total echoes, or 91.8%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 802 useful echoes, or 40.2%; in 4 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 10 1 10 1.43 1.87 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 108 108 108 0 -66 35 7 0 36 2 -27 43 -21 27 123 13 0 0 8 432 351 1976 -3.87 -6.90 -5.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 -234 -305 -271 2 -38 24 -8 23 49 8 -40 20 -9 -72 54 18 63 0 2 318 758 1815 4.33 5.92 5.06 0.00 6.12 0.00 258 361 288 2 -28 25 -27 23 56 4 -3 2 -4 100 38 16 64 0 6 42 1798 1925 6.14 6.33 6.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 513 546 517 7 -34 48 29 21 47 8 3 5 44 298 78 15 0 0 POL rejected 7 multiple- & other traces: NIX 9 204 11 217 1.46 1.87 1.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 107 108 108 1 -51 32 15 14 45 5 0 18 -56 27 79 14 -55 0 10 205 221 735 3.58 4.23 3.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 257 248 2 0 21 -10 19 52 6 0 4 92 5 33 18 -11 0 11 183 223 739 3.63 4.24 3.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 472 514 495 6 -17 41 -26 66 39 4 0 49 149 -52 66 17 -11 0 3 189 759 1729 4.33 5.74 4.99 0.00 6.19 0.00 511 606 540 6 -48 50 -22 51 37 3 -1 5 8 292 84 14 -200 0 4 38 970 1611 -5.14 -5.58 -5.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 -547 -562 -547 5 -60 55 -37 57 35 3 2 7 36 28 93 16 -46 0 7 44 1800 1934 -6.20 -6.38 -6.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 -459 -472 -456 3 -85 54 -20 37 51 4 -3 4 55 85 66 17 -40 0 5 166 1125 1810 5.20 5.83 5.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 575 662 598 10 -48 54 -48 68 39 6 -3 7 27 260 82 14 -112 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-30 0327UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 89.14383 RIQ.11111100]. Done 2010/03/30 at 03:30:05.5; *********************** MMAX= 1995: DSND normal termination