Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 21.7019 LT Hour= 3.7019 CosCHI=-.3008 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 89 STARTT=1269985327 UT_dDAY= 89.90425 LT_sDAY= 88.90425 FILNM = [TK03302142] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-30 2142UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 89.90425 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/03/30 begin at 21:43:06.0 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 7282 3946 981 0 0 2097 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 89.90425 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3946 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 49 11; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.984 DSND organized 3882 total echoes, or 98.4%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 3882 useful echoes, or 98.4%; in 11 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 7 109 1454 2320 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 648 31 38 98 -206 147 45 3 -9 12 0 0 104 13 0 0 6 102 1448 2701 0.00 0.00 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 605 19 -179 118 -127 83 44 4 -3 10 0 0 108 14 0 0 10 42 2732 3083 0.00 0.00 -3.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -699 8 -60 107 -41 68 43 3 2 9 0 0 140 12 0 0 9 580 2631 3911 0.00 0.00 -3.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -422 13 40 49 -81 50 55 6 -2 6 0 0 74 16 0 0 8 478 1537 3890 0.00 0.00 -3.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -370 9 -46 52 -17 48 56 6 -5 16 0 0 70 16 0 0 1 1102 5 2573 0.00 0.00 2.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 353 9 -36 60 -14 49 51 6 3 9 0 0 60 16 0 0 2 506 45 2772 0.00 0.00 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 674 14 -125 140 -54 106 42 3 3 12 0 0 102 14 0 0 5 294 1254 2645 0.00 0.00 2.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 520 16 -37 61 -135 65 48 4 -3 11 0 0 81 14 0 0 4 59 880 2790 0.00 0.00 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 748 14 -148 102 -192 39 41 3 -8 5 0 0 120 12 0 0 3 485 275 2577 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 436 13 -46 95 -22 76 50 6 0 11 0 0 66 15 0 0 11 125 3326 3906 0.00 0.00 -3.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -535 21 9 26 -80 68 48 4 -1 6 0 0 99 14 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.7118 2.7790 301.26 495.07 98.8380447.7367 2 1.8627 2.8901 608.34 647.40 98.1368******** 3 2.1794 2.7862 405.17 513.08714.8729297.5671 4 2.8285 2.9210 727.91 725.33**************** 5 2.5369 2.8371 510.95 614.05**************** 6 2.6103 2.8136 595.22 585.49******** 69.9581 7 2.5779 2.7027 636.54 636.51**************** 8 -2.6919 -3.5978 -333.69 -491.42 44.7181466.1950 9 -2.9048 -3.6396 -363.87 -556.61186.5483557.7469 10 -2.9864 -3.1623 -693.35 -729.88 73.3963341.7594 11 -3.4141 -3.5801 -524.96 -606.12859.2091154.5960 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -3 5 2577 2645 2.79 2.54 513.1 510.9 298 -131 485 294 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 11 10 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.55 0.86 0 0.56 0.16 0.12 0 0 0 0 2 0.89 0.53 0.06 0.64 0.20 0.12 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.67 0.05 0.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.91 1.00 0.01 0.34 0.31 0.19 0 0 0 0 5 0.83 1.00 0 1.00 0.11 0.45 0 0 0 0 6 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 0.74 0.06 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.47 0.76 0.19 0.18 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.94 0.38 0.24 0.23 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.09 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 0.09 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3882.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.28 0.62 0 0.56 0.53 0.31 0 0 0 0 2 0.38 0.13 0.74 0.42 0.34 0.21 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.26 0.02 0.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.44 0.58 0.80 0.20 0.58 0.36 0 0 0 0 5 0.47 0.66 0 0.42 0.03 0.13 0 0 0 0 6 0.69 0.79 0 0.64 0.87 0.03 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0.49 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.51 0.15 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.01 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0 2 0 3 7 0 6 6 4 0 5 5 9 0 10 6 8 8 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10 8 8 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 353.044 673.700 0.047 2 1 5 353.044 604.615 0.155 2 1 6 353.044 647.896 0.086 2 4 2 443.281 673.700 0.273 2 7 9 370.314 699.167 0.058 2 8 9 421.632 699.167 0.187 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 6 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 636.54 636.51 647.90 RELsr, RELer = 0.0177 0.0177; TOL = 0.030 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 1102 1.7 2.8 353.0 7 478 -2.7 -3.6-370.3 1.656 0.22 -0.93 1.15-46.90 22 1 Qiojx 1 1102 1.7 2.8 353.0 8 580 -2.9 -3.6-421.6 1.451 0.22 -0.87 0.03 63.64 18 1 Aiojx 1 1.9 379.1 8 2.7-436.3 1.451 0.22 -0.87 0.03 63.64 18 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 190.92 190.92 AZOXx: [x 8o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 190.92 190.92 Qiojx 1 1102 1.7 2.8 353.0 9 42 -3.0 -3.2-699.2 1.184 0.22 -0.48 4.78-12.73 8 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -12.728 1 o 9 x 2.036 2.223 8 x 7 1.9 2.7 0.0 190.9 190.9 3 Qiojx 1 1102 1.7 2.8 353.0 10 125 -3.4 -3.6-535.2 1.111 0.22 -0.76 0.94 16.77 5 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 16.771 1 o 10 x 2.489 2.663 8 x 7 1.9 2.7 0.0 190.9 190.9 3 Qiojx 2 506 1.9 2.9 673.7 7 478 -2.7 -3.6-370.3 1.499 0.18 -1.74 6.25-41.41 19 2 Qiojx 2 506 1.9 2.9 673.7 8 580 -2.9 -3.6-421.6 1.451 0.18 -1.60 4.52-33.94 18 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -33.941 8 x 2 o 1.948 2.725 1 o 7 1.7 2.8 0.0 190.9 190.9 2 Qiojx 2 506 1.9 2.9 673.7 9 42 -3.0 -3.2-699.2 1.184 0.18 -0.92 1.61-15.56 8 2 Qiojx 2 506 1.9 2.9 673.7 10 125 -3.4 -3.6-535.2 1.111 0.18 -1.31 3.56 -5.59 5 2 Qiojx 4 779 2.2 2.8 443.3 7 478 -2.7 -3.6-370.3 1.292 0.20 -1.07 2.65-24.87 11 4 Qiojx 4 779 2.2 2.8 443.3 8 580 -2.9 -3.6-421.6 1.301 0.20 -0.98 1.53-23.22 11 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -23.216 8 x 4 o 2.179 2.725 1 o 7 1.7 2.8 0.0 190.9 190.9 2 Qiojx 4 779 2.2 2.8 443.3 9 42 -3.0 -3.2-699.2 1.096 0.20 -0.58 3.24 -1.41 2 4 Qiojx 4 779 2.2 2.8 443.3 10 125 -3.4 -3.6-535.2 1.111 0.20 -0.86 0.51 19.01 5 4 Aiojx 4 2.5 483.0 10 2.7-559.3 1.111 0.20 -0.86 0.51 19.01 5 -4 AZOXo: [o 4x10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 57.02 57.02 AZOXx: [x10o 4] TOz,o,x= 0.00 57.02 57.02 Qiojx 5 102 2.6 2.8 604.6 7 478 -2.7 -3.6-370.3 1.064 0.05 -1.26 4.93 -4.50 4 5 Qiojx 5 102 2.6 2.8 604.6 8 580 -2.9 -3.6-421.6 1.072 0.05 -1.14 3.63 -5.50 4 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -5.500 8 x 5 o 2.610 2.725 1 o 7 1.7 2.8 0.0 190.9 190.9 2 Qiojx 5 102 2.6 2.8 604.6 10 125 -3.4 -3.6-535.2 1.072 0.05 -1.02 2.43 -3.50 4 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -3.500 10 x 5 o 2.610 2.663 4 o 7 2.2 2.8 0.0 57.0 57.0 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 8 2 3 4 o 4x10 5 6 7 8 x 8o 1 9 10 x10o 4 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 190.9 190.9 4 0.0 57.0 57.0 8 0.0 190.9 190.9 10 0.0 57.0 57.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 5 595.22 585.49 604.62 0.0157 0.0321 -46 3 727.91 725.33 747.83 0.0270 0.0305 -46 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.807 4 -3.502 8 9.000 0.084 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.8 -3.5 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 4 32 2.81 0 2.32 3.40 Admit k 8 4 1 0 2.78 0 Add k 8 4 1 0 0 353.0 406.6 442 262 Admit k 8 4 2 0 2.89 0 Add k 8 4 2 0 0 673.7 714.9 159 330 Admit k 8 4 3 0 2.92 0 Add k 8 4 3 0 0 747.8 729.6 20 337 Admit k 8 4 4 32 2.84 0 Add k 8 4 4 -32 0 443.3 495.4 471 653 Admit k 8 4 5 0 2.81 0 Add k 8 4 5 0 0 604.6 593.2 40 674 Result j 8 4 32 674 13 2.61 674 jj OK j 9 8 32 3.50 19 2.89 4.24 Admit k 9 8 7 0 -3.60 19 Add k 9 8 7 0 19-370.3-405.4 187 76 Admit k 9 8 8 32 -3.64 19 Add k 9 8 8 -32 19-421.6-447.2 284 221 Admit k 9 8 9 0 -3.16 19 Add k 9 8 9 0 19-699.2-712.2 7 222 Admit k 9 8 10 0 -3.58 19 Add k 9 8 10 0 19-535.2-546.1 60 254 Result j 9 8 32 352 23 2.93 927 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 89.90425 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.584 0.1136 3.418 0.0816 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.807 -3.502 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.71 301.26 515.7 0 0 2 4 2.18 405.17 883.0 32 0 3 7 -2.69 -333.69 898.3 0 0 4 8 -2.90 -363.87 1057.0 32 0 5 2 1.86 608.34 1133.2 0 0 6 5 2.61 595.22 1553.7 0 0 7 6 2.58 636.54 1641.0 0 -699 8 10 -3.41 -524.96 1792.3 0 0 9 3 2.83 727.91 2058.9 0 0 10 9 -2.99 -693.35 2070.6 0 0 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 1x 8] JQ, k, M, C = 1 4 1o JQ, k, M, C = 1 7 8x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.7118 1.000E+00 2 2 1.8627 2.499E-06 3 3 2.8285 7.046E-10 4 4 2.1794 7.324E-03 5 5 2.6103 5.930E-09 6 7 1.7152 3.129E-04 7 8 1.9476 2.246E-02 8 9 2.0355 2.182E-08 9 10 2.4894 1.803E-04 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 1 1.7118 1.000E+00 2 7 1.7152 3.129E-04 3 2 1.8627 2.499E-06 4 8 1.9476 2.246E-02 5 9 2.0355 2.182E-08 6 4 2.1794 7.324E-03 7 10 2.4894 1.803E-04 8 5 2.6103 5.930E-09 9 3 2.8285 7.046E-10 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 1 1.7118 2.7790 1.000E+00 64 0 2 -7 1.7152 2.6816 3.129E-04 0 0 3 2 1.8627 2.8901 2.499E-06 0 0 4 -8 1.9476 2.7252 2.246E-02 63 0 5 -9 2.0355 2.2235 2.182E-08 0 0 6 4 2.1794 2.8371 7.324E-03 32 0 7 -10 2.4894 2.6631 1.803E-04 0 0 8 5 2.6103 2.8136 5.930E-09 0 0 9 3 2.8285 2.9210 7.046E-10 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 1 1.000E+00 M 1 8 x j 7 10 1.803E-04 M 7 4 o -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 5 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 4 2 5 3 IGj: 19 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.71 2.18 1.86 2.61 2.83 SrtFE 2.78 2.84 2.89 2.81 2.92 MANy= 64 62 0 0 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 1102 779 506 102 59 XYTy= 38.6 50.5 136.6 219.1 242.4 RTRy= 353.0 443.3 673.7 604.6 747.8 BWjj=0.55360.34120.53290.10550.0480 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 4 MAN= 64 62 FST= 1.71 2.18 FET= 2.78 2.84 RST= 301.3 405.2 RET= 495.1 614.1 RTR= 353.0 443.3 XYT= 38.6 50.5 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 3.7019 -0.3008 1.6992 156.53 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 29 1 19 1 1 2.58 1.71 2.78 293.0 502.9 2.58 0.00 2.58 30 4 19 2 2 2.61 2.18 2.84 369.0 635.8 2.58 0.00 2.58 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6508 2.6075 4 2.6075 2.5840 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-30 2142UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 89.90425 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=156.5 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.666 (±0.092) MHz, Height 307.1 (± 6.4) km. ScaleHt 37.1 (± 8.6) km SlabT 61.5 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 3.3664 90.1403 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.8067 3.5018 0.0000 0.0000 2.5840 3.4182 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.5840 315.9193 32.3 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0632 0.8500 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 507.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.2143 266.9665 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 270.4800 1.9833 -32.2 37.1 30.2 8.1 -8.4 45.5 0.566 27.0 17.0 -15.9 43.0 14 287.6196 2.2982 -22.1 22.6 13.5 5.8 -4.2 36.5 0.638 12.0 14.4 -7.5 34.1 67 305.8454 2.5412 -19.9 20.2 12.3 4.6 -3.3 29.8 0.594 11.1 11.5 -6.4 27.8 129 325.2262 2.5590 -19.0 19.8 11.7 4.4 -3.0 28.2 0.594 10.5 10.9 -5.9 26.3 136 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 89.90425 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.584 315.92 32.32 0.439 0.755 1.193 1.721 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3946 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 9 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 89.90425 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111111 89.90425 998 -23.8 20.4 21.8 2.5 -0.9 18.0 70.9 20.8 5.8 -6.6 17.2 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00007 0.00060 0.00167 0.00327 0.15721 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00002 0.00015 0.00043 0.00084 0.35181 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 3 4 0.00044 0.00395 0.01097 0.02150 0.28129 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00003 0.00024 0.00068 0.00132 0.15274 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 5 4 0.00012 0.00112 0.00311 0.00609 0.31186 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 7 4 0.00002 0.00021 0.00058 0.00113 0.07698 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 8 4 0.00009 0.00084 0.00234 0.00458 0.08002 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 9 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.27679 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 10 4 0.00000 0.00001 0.00003 0.00007 0.10153 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 DSND organized 3882 total echoes, or 98.4%; in 10 traces; of which DSND selected 3773 useful echoes, or 95.6%; in 9 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 1102 5 2573 1.71 2.78 2.36 0.00 2.56 0.00 301 495 353 9 -36 60 -14 49 51 6 3 0 99 448 60 16 64 0 4 779 275 2645 2.18 2.84 2.62 0.00 2.81 0.00 405 614 443 18 -44 95 -25 77 49 6 0 12 715 2020 71 15 62 0 7 478 1537 3890 -2.69 -3.60 -3.26 0.00 -3.30 0.00 -334 -491 -370 9 -46 52 -17 48 56 6 -5 16 45 466 70 16 0 0 8 580 2631 3911 -2.90 -3.64 -3.32 0.00 -3.50 0.00 -364 -557 -422 13 40 49 -81 50 55 6 -2 6 187 558 74 16 63 0 2 506 45 2772 1.86 2.89 2.38 0.00 2.47 0.00 608 647 674 14 -125 140 -54 106 42 3 3 12 98 -696 102 14 0 0 5 102 1448 2701 2.61 2.81 2.71 2.63 0.00 0.00 595 585 605 21 -179 120 -127 84 44 4 -3 10 -961 70 108 14 0 0 10 125 3326 3906 -3.41 -3.58 -3.48 -3.45 -3.45 0.00 -525 -606 -535 21 9 26 -80 68 48 4 -1 6 859 155 99 14 62 0 3 59 880 2790 2.83 2.92 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 728 725 748 24 -148 113 -192 66 41 3 -8 13 -121 -121 120 12 0 0 9 42 2732 3083 -2.99 -3.16 -3.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 -693 -730 -699 8 -60 107 -41 68 43 3 2 9 73 342 140 12 0 0 POL rejected 1 multiple- & other traces: NIX 6 109 1454 2320 2.58 2.70 2.63 0.00 2.52 0.00 637 637 648 31 38 98 -206 147 45 3 -9 12 -1647 -230 104 13 -699 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-03-30 2142UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 89.90425 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/03/30 at 21:46:21.9; *********************** MMAX= 3946: DSND normal termination