Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 16.9519 LT Hour= 22.9519 CosCHI=-.3989 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 99 STARTT=1270832227 UT_dDAY= 99.70633 LT_sDAY= 99.70633 FILNM = [TK04091657] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-09 1657UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 99.70633 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/04/09 begin at 16:57:05.9 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5287 2641 572 0 0 2078 1 512 16.5 782.5 7 4 99.70633 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2641 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 62 9; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.965 DSND organized 2548 total echoes, or 96.5%; in 9 traces; of which DSND selected 2548 useful echoes, or 96.5%; in 9 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 6 98 1558 2130 0.00 0.00 3.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 452 15 5 61 -35 103 51 4 -2 6 0 0 86 14 0 0 5 193 807 2558 0.00 0.00 -3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -616 8 7 85 -8 141 54 6 0 6 0 0 73 16 0 0 8 27 1820 2216 0.00 0.00 3.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 540 19 -50 99 -219 159 50 3 -4 10 0 0 97 14 0 0 7 30 1710 2028 0.00 0.00 3.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 504 19 -52 83 -29 157 47 3 -12 6 0 0 114 13 0 0 1 828 26 2135 0.00 0.00 2.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 307 6 36 53 -35 59 56 5 0 7 0 0 50 16 0 0 2 351 28 2005 0.00 0.00 2.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 595 7 -2 107 -32 107 47 3 -1 11 0 0 79 14 0 0 4 314 633 2140 0.00 0.00 2.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 362 12 -55 48 -35 73 54 4 -2 6 0 0 58 16 0 0 3 669 592 2603 0.00 0.00 -3.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -311 8 12 48 -30 62 61 6 -1 4 0 0 49 17 0 0 9 38 2505 2605 0.00 0.00 -3.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -415 13 -40 20 53 45 59 3 -1 1 0 0 69 15 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6374 3.0805 265.20 365.45 21.1495183.0954 2 1.6501 2.9490 524.07 728.48125.3841189.9196 3 -2.4501 -3.8486 -286.65 -388.53 -8.8733211.0518 4 2.5964 3.1060 328.08 420.55 64.9856-11.4861 5 -2.6798 -3.7794 -576.56 -732.71 32.3864465.9709 6 2.9720 3.2238 444.72 458.92207.0812******** 7 3.0154 3.1009 493.00 506.74206.4343******** 8 3.1454 3.2322 534.70 522.66 33.7245-64.1625 9 -3.7918 -3.8469 -419.43 -420.47252.7048******** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -4 6 2140 2130 3.11 2.97 420.6 444.7 -11 207 314 98 -6 7 2130 2028 3.22 3.02 458.9 493.0 -199 206 412 30 -7 8 2028 2216 3.10 3.15 506.7 534.7 -136 34 442 27 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 9 6 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 1 0.65 0.90 0 0 0.34 0 2 1.00 0.59 0 0 0.27 0 3 0 0 0.63 0.79 0 0.04 4 0 0 1.00 0.50 0 0 5 0.76 0.55 0 0 0.29 0 6 0 0 1.00 0 0 0.02 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 2548.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 1 0.32 0.70 0 0 0.42 0 2 0.30 0.14 0 0 0.40 0 3 0 0 0.26 0.71 0 0 4 0 0 0.29 0.08 0 0 5 0.58 0.60 0 0 0.18 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 11 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 307.156 594.677 0.032 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 828 1.6 3.1 307.2 2 351 1.7 2.9 594.7 16.5 284.1 566.7 1.000 -200 -2 16 -2 2 3 4 311.402 616.359 0.010 A12M 3 669 -2.5 -3.8-311.4 4 193 -2.7 -3.8-616.4 13.5 306.9 595.8 0.013 -200 -2 13 -4 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 828 1.6 3.1 307.2 3 669 -2.5 -3.8-311.4 1.836 0.15 -0.93 0.85 21.17 28 1 Aiojx 1 1.6 300.7 3 3.0-324.2 1.836 0.15 -0.93 0.85 21.17 28 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 63.50 63.50 AZOXx: [x 3o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 63.50 63.50 Qiojx 1 828 1.6 3.1 307.2 6 38 -3.8 -3.8-414.9 1.034 0.15 -0.84 0.09 4.95 2 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 4.950 1 o 6 x 2.884 2.941 3 x 7 1.4 2.9 0.0 63.5 63.5 3 Qiojx 5 469 2.6 3.2 384.1 3 669 -2.5 -3.8-311.4 1.222 0.13 -0.99 2.46-12.00 9 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -12.000 3 x 5 o 2.596 2.942 1 o 7 1.6 3.1 0.0 63.5 63.5 2 Qiojx 5 469 2.6 3.2 384.1 6 38 -3.8 -3.8-414.9 1.034 0.13 -0.93 1.48 2.83 2 5 Aiojx 5 2.9 395.6 6 3.0-423.9 1.034 0.13 -0.93 1.48 2.83 2 -5 AZOXo: [o 5x 6] TOz,o,x= 0.00 8.49 8.49 AZOXx: [x 6o 5] TOz,o,x= 0.00 8.49 8.49 JNOZ io ITo FSTo FETo RTo jz ITz FSTz FETz RTz BWzo YRTo YRTz RD Qoz TO NB i/j Qiojz 1 828 1.6 3.1 307.2 5 469 2.6 3.2 384.1 1.046 0.15 0.13 0.82 1.76 -1.00 1 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -1.000 5 o 5 x 2.596 3.232 6 x 7 2.9 2.9 0.0 8.5 8.5 2 JNOZ io ITo FSTo FETo RTo jz ITz FSTz FETz RTz BWzo YRTo YRTz RD Qoz TO NB i/j Qiojz 5 469 2.6 3.2 384.1 1 828 1.6 3.1 307.2 1.394 0.13 0.15 0.74 3.57-64.00 16 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -64.000 1 o 1 x 1.637 3.081 3 x 7 1.4 2.9 0.0 63.5 63.5 2 JNXZ iz ITz FSTz FETz RTRz jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxz YRTz RD Qzx TO NB i/j Qizjx 1 828 1.6 3.1 307.2 3 669 -2.5 -3.8-311.4 1.302 0.15 -0.81 0.51-17.96 14 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -17.960 1 o 1 o 1.637 3.081 3 x 7 1.4 2.9 0.0 63.5 63.5 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -17.960 1 o 1 x 1.637 3.081 3 x 7 1.4 2.9 0.0 63.5 63.5 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -17.960 1 z 3 x 2.302 2.942 3 x 7 1.4 2.9 0.0 63.5 63.5 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -17.960 3 x 1 o 1.637 2.942 1 o 7 1.6 3.1 0.0 63.5 63.5 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -17.960 1 o 3 x 1.637 2.942 3 x 7 1.4 2.9 0.0 63.5 63.5 3 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 3 2 3 x 3o 1 4 5 o 5x 6 6 x 6o 5 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 63.5 63.5 3 0.0 63.5 63.5 5 0.0 8.5 8.5 6 0.0 8.5 8.5 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 3.390 5 -3.640 3 9.000 0.217 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 3.4 0.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 5 16 3.39 0 2.80 4.10 Admit k 8 5 1 0 3.08 0 Add k 8 5 1 0 0 307.2 344.7 51 16 Admit k 8 5 5 16 3.23 0 Add k 8 5 5 -16 0 384.1 412.4 205 120 Result j 8 5 16 119 7 2.97 119 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 99.70633 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.967 0.0594 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.390 0.000 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.64 265.20 434.2 0 0 2 3 -2.45 -286.65 702.3 0 0 3 5 2.60 328.08 851.8 16 0 4 2 1.65 524.07 864.8 0 -200 5 4 -2.68 -576.56 1545.1 0 -200 6 6 -3.79 -419.43 1590.4 0 0 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 3o 1] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6374 5.046E-01 2 3 1.4441 1.000E+00 3 5 2.5964 5.448E-04 4 6 2.8835 3.718E-06 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 3 1.4441 1.000E+00 2 1 1.6374 5.046E-01 3 5 2.5964 5.448E-04 4 6 2.8835 3.718E-06 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -3 1.4441 2.9424 1.000E+00 63 0 2 1 1.6374 3.0805 5.046E-01 64 0 3 5 2.5964 3.2322 5.448E-04 16 0 4 -6 2.8835 2.9406 3.718E-06 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 2 1 5.046E-01 M 2 3 x j 3 5 5.448E-04 M 3 6 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 2 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 5 IGj: 19 19 SrtFS 1.64 2.60 SrtFE 3.08 3.23 MANy= 64 62 NIXy= 0 0 ITRy= 828 469 XYTy= 50.4 65.3 RTRy= 307.2 384.1 BWjj=0.65270.2875 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 5 MAN= 64 62 FST= 1.64 2.60 FET= 3.08 3.23 RST= 265.2 328.1 RET= 365.5 522.7 RTR= 307.2 384.1 XYT= 50.4 65.3 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 22.9519 -0.3989 0.3989 147.45 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 40 1 19 1 1 2.95 1.64 3.08 263.3 406.6 2.96 0.00 2.97 41 5 19 2 2 2.98 2.60 3.23 318.1 507.5 2.96 0.00 2.97 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6301 2.9804 5 2.9804 2.9669 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-09 1657UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 99.70633 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=147.4 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 3.049 (±0.129) MHz, Height 277.7 (± 3.5) km. ScaleHt 28.7 (± 5.1) km SlabT 48.4 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 22.6164 99.9424 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 3.3901 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9669 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.9669 271.7406 22.6 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 6.5542 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 801.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0971 278.8050 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 7 HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 211.5442 1.6486 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 224.9492 1.9677 -24.7 41.0 -4.1 3.7 -1.3 29.9 0.463 -4.3 7.2 -0.2 29.3 32 239.2037 2.3778 -15.9 30.0 -2.3 4.8 -0.9 33.9 0.431 -2.5 12.0 -0.3 32.1 72 254.3616 2.7521 -10.3 21.0 -3.7 3.4 -0.9 24.1 0.458 -3.8 8.5 0.1 22.8 109 270.4800 2.9617 -28.2 47.3 -2.8 3.4 -0.1 20.9 0.467 -2.8 7.6 0.6 19.8 130 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 99.70633 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.967 271.74 22.59 0.541 0.696 1.237 1.286 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2641 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 6 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 99.70633 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111111 99.70633 998 -4.5 12.2 -7.9 1.0 -2.3 7.5 58.0 -8.2 2.3 -0.2 7.2 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00004 0.00012 0.00023 0.12059 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00001 0.00012 0.00033 0.00065 0.06931 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 5 4 0.00002 0.00016 0.00046 0.00090 0.21396 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 6 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.17748 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 DSND organized 2548 total echoes, or 96.5%; in 6 traces; of which DSND selected 2004 useful echoes, or 75.9%; in 4 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 828 26 2135 1.64 3.08 2.32 0.00 2.74 0.00 265 365 307 6 36 53 -35 59 56 5 0 7 21 183 50 16 64 0 3 669 592 2603 -2.45 -3.85 -3.17 0.00 -3.64 0.00 -287 -389 -311 8 12 48 -30 62 61 6 -1 4 -9 211 49 17 63 0 5 469 633 2216 2.60 3.23 2.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 328 523 384 20 -41 68 -51 98 53 4 -2 7 65 -64 68 16 62 0 6 38 2505 2605 -3.79 -3.85 -3.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 -419 -420 -415 13 -40 20 53 45 59 3 -1 1 253 -129 69 15 62 0 POL rejected 2 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 351 28 2005 1.65 2.95 2.43 0.00 2.68 0.00 524 728 595 7 -2 107 -32 107 47 3 -1 11 125 190 79 14 -200 0 4 193 807 2558 -2.68 -3.78 -3.30 0.00 -4.24 0.00 -577 -733 -616 7 7 88 -8 139 54 6 0 6 32 466 73 16 -200 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-09 1657UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 99.70633 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/04/09 at 17:00:27.0; *********************** MMAX= 2641: DSND normal termination