Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 19.2019 LT Hour= 1.2019 CosCHI=-.4220 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 99 STARTT=1270840327 UT_dDAY= 99.80008 LT_sDAY= 98.80008 FILNM = [TK04091912] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-09 1912UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 99.80008 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/04/09 begin at 19:12:04.5 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 4560 1842 479 0 0 2033 1 512 16.5 782.5 9 4 99.80008 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 1842 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 57 11; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.950 DSND organized 1750 total echoes, or 95.0%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 1750 useful echoes, or 95.0%; in 11 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 7 72 1060 1515 0.00 0.00 -2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -342 10 30 92 -35 39 49 5 -6 8 0 0 64 16 0 0 6 530 804 1791 0.00 0.00 -2.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -368 11 -45 82 32 74 50 5 -2 10 0 0 63 16 0 0 10 130 1400 1799 0.00 0.00 -2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -516 18 -82 115 30 62 47 3 -4 6 0 0 94 14 0 0 9 146 1340 1797 0.00 0.00 -2.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -455 12 -76 93 45 92 50 4 -6 15 0 0 81 15 0 0 8 20 1089 1641 0.00 0.00 -2.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -703 7 -144 55 122 65 39 2 0 20 0 0 103 14 0 0 1 483 25 841 0.00 0.00 1.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 361 11 -89 57 49 73 49 3 0 13 0 0 85 14 0 0 2 23 31 654 0.00 0.00 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 634 18 -61 90 53 64 41 2 -13 21 0 0 139 13 0 0 5 35 560 820 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 540 19 -110 128 128 135 40 2 -6 17 0 0 136 13 0 0 4 96 455 839 0.00 0.00 2.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 477 16 -104 109 124 106 43 2 -11 12 0 0 110 14 0 0 3 155 362 821 0.00 0.00 1.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 424 13 -72 67 80 67 44 2 -4 16 0 0 107 13 0 0 11 60 1479 1779 0.00 0.00 -2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -593 22 16 128 54 88 43 2 -3 11 0 0 116 13 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.6229 2.0677 311.16 405.43-23.4749-54.2256 2 1.6503 1.7495 618.64 633.82384.8930 20.0898 3 1.8581 2.0730 396.65 443.69********-31.2210 4 1.9094 2.1713 477.52 471.49**************** 5 1.9521 2.0706 543.19 528.33-25.4266******** 6 -2.2224 -2.9324 -324.96 -419.52 -8.8683184.5325 7 -2.6530 -2.7648 -350.32 -372.41284.7581162.3251 8 -2.6141 -2.7149 -716.01 -706.65 87.8126******** 9 -2.7499 -3.0154 -449.51 -459.38886.0413 34.5253 10 -2.7731 -3.0298 -514.53 -502.28709.4218******** 11 -2.8199 -2.9582 -601.64 -576.37 90.9285-96.6474 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -6 7 1791 1515 -2.93 -2.65-419.5-350.3 185 285 530 72 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 11 10 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.32 0.22 0.47 0.36 0.26 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.00 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.98 0 0.15 0.76 0.55 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.60 0 0.62 0.19 0.45 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.98 0 1.00 1.00 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.39 0.19 0.03 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.07 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0.19 0.91 0.52 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.94 0.18 0.54 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.10 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 1750.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.28 0.72 0.37 0.34 0.40 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.28 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.63 0 0.09 0.39 0.43 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.66 0 0.61 0.05 0.41 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.60 0 0.57 0.59 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.34 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0 2 0 3 8 0 4 6 0 5 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 5 0 9 5 0 6 10 5 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 360.894 633.921 0.130 2 6 7 343.776 702.539 0.022 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 2 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 618.64 633.82 633.92 RELsr, RELer = 0.0244 0.0002; TOL = 0.030 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 7 -699 RST, RET, RTR = -716.01 -706.65 -702.54 RELsr, RELer = 0.0190 0.0058; TOL = 0.030 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 483 1.6 2.1 360.9 6 602 -2.2 -2.8-343.8 1.140 0.39 -0.87 1.20 13.42 5 1 Aiojx 1 1.6 334.0 6 1.8-385.0 1.140 0.39 -0.87 1.20 13.42 5 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 6] TOz,o,x= 0.00 40.25 40.25 AZOXx: [x 6o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 40.25 40.25 Qiojx 1 483 1.6 2.1 360.9 8 146 -2.7 -3.0-455.2 1.232 0.39 -0.84 1.17 39.00 9 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 39.000 1 o 8 x 1.779 2.067 6 x 7 1.2 1.8 0.0 40.2 40.2 3 Qiojx 1 483 1.6 2.1 360.9 9 130 -2.8 -3.0-516.3 1.210 0.39 -0.76 0.11 26.87 8 1 Aiojx 1 1.8 388.3 9 2.2-514.4 1.210 0.39 -0.76 0.11 26.87 8 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 6x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 120.86 80.61 AZOXx: [x 9o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 80.61 80.61 Qiojx 1 483 1.6 2.1 360.9 10 60 -2.8 -3.0-592.8 1.137 0.39 -0.65 1.51 -2.24 5 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.236 1 o 10 x 1.856 2.005 9 x 10 1.8 2.1 0.0 80.6 80.6 3 Qiojx 3 155 1.9 2.1 424.0 8 146 -2.7 -3.0-455.2 1.172 0.45 -0.93 1.65 1.22 6 3 Aiojx 3 1.8 431.5 8 2.2-462.7 1.172 0.45 -0.93 1.65 1.22 6 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 3.67 3.67 AZOXx: [x 8o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 3.67 3.67 Qiojx 3 155 1.9 2.1 424.0 9 130 -2.8 -3.0-516.3 1.181 0.45 -0.84 0.84 31.84 6 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 31.843 3 o 9 x 1.858 2.073 8 x 7 1.8 2.1 0.0 3.7 3.7 3 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 3 4 [o 3x 8] Tzox= 0.00 3.67 3.67 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 3 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 8 4 [x 8o 3] Tzox= 0.00 3.67 0.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 8 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 31.843 9 x 3 o 1.858 2.073 1 o 7 1.6 2.1 0.0 120.9 80.6 2 Qiojx 3 155 1.9 2.1 424.0 10 60 -2.8 -3.0-592.8 1.128 0.45 -0.75 0.40 7.00 4 3 Aiojx 3 1.8 435.4 10 2.1-582.3 1.128 0.45 -0.75 0.40 7.00 4 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 21.00 21.00 AZOXx: [x10o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 21.00 21.00 Qiojx 4 96 1.9 2.2 476.9 8 146 -2.7 -3.0-455.2 1.143 0.52 -1.05 3.62 -4.90 6 4 Qiojx 4 96 1.9 2.2 476.9 9 130 -2.8 -3.0-516.3 1.152 0.52 -0.95 2.15 -4.90 6 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -4.899 9 x 4 o 1.909 2.082 1 o 7 1.6 2.1 0.0 120.9 80.6 2 Qiojx 4 96 1.9 2.2 476.9 10 60 -2.8 -3.0-592.8 1.100 0.52 -0.82 0.65 17.00 4 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 17.000 10 x 4 o 1.909 2.005 3 o 7 1.9 2.1 0.0 21.0 21.0 2 Qiojx 5 35 2.0 2.1 540.3 8 146 -2.7 -3.0-455.2 1.115 0.50 -1.15 4.03 -1.00 4 5 Qiojx 5 35 2.0 2.1 540.3 9 130 -2.8 -3.0-516.3 1.124 0.50 -1.04 3.07 -3.00 4 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -3.000 9 x 5 o 1.952 2.071 1 o 7 1.6 2.1 0.0 120.9 80.6 2 Qiojx 5 35 2.0 2.1 540.3 10 60 -2.8 -3.0-592.8 1.073 0.50 -0.93 2.03 -2.60 3 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.598 10 x 5 o 1.952 2.005 3 o 7 1.9 2.1 0.0 21.0 21.0 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 6x 9 2 3 o 3x10 4 5 6 x 6o 1 7 8 9 x 9o 1 10 x10o 3 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 120.9 80.6 3 0.0 21.0 21.0 6 0.0 40.2 40.2 9 0.0 80.6 80.6 10 0.0 21.0 21.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 4 477.52 471.49 476.93 0.0012 0.0115 -46 5 543.19 528.33 540.26 0.0054 0.0223 -46 8 449.51 459.38 455.16 0.0125 0.0092 -40 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.234 1 -2.794 6 9.000 0.201 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.2 0.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 1 16 2.23 0 1.85 2.70 Admit k 8 1 1 16 2.07 0 Add k 8 1 1 -16 0 360.9 372.9 85 22 Admit k 8 1 3 0 2.07 0 Add k 8 1 3 0 0 424.0 424.9 53 40 Admit k 8 1 4 0 2.17 0 Add k 8 1 4 0 0 476.9 480.6 23 44 Admit k 8 1 5 0 2.07 0 Add k 8 1 5 0 0 540.3 536.3 5 44 Result j 8 1 16 42 4 1.90 42 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 99.80008 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 1.885 0.0412 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.234 0.000 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.62 311.16 505.0 16 0 2 6 -2.22 -324.96 722.2 0 0 3 3 1.86 396.65 737.0 0 0 4 4 1.91 477.52 911.8 0 0 5 2 1.65 618.64 1020.9 0 -699 6 5 1.95 543.19 1060.3 0 0 7 8 -2.75 -449.51 1236.1 0 -40 8 9 -2.77 -514.53 1426.8 0 0 9 10 -2.82 -601.64 1696.6 0 0 10 7 -2.61 -716.01 1871.8 0 -699 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [x 6o 1] # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.6229 4.301E-01 2 3 1.8581 1.542E-03 3 4 1.9094 2.300E-06 4 5 1.9521 5.369E-08 5 6 1.1770 1.000E+00 6 8 1.7790 -6.096E-05 7 9 1.8044 6.391E-03 8 10 1.8555 2.130E-04 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 6 1.1770 1.000E+00 2 1 1.6229 4.301E-01 3 8 1.7790 -6.096E-05 4 9 1.8044 6.391E-03 5 10 1.8555 2.130E-04 6 3 1.8581 1.542E-03 7 4 1.9094 2.300E-06 8 5 1.9521 5.369E-08 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -6 1.1770 1.7953 1.000E+00 63 0 2 1 1.6229 2.0677 4.301E-01 64 0 3 -8 1.7790 2.0666 -6.096E-05 0 -40 4 -9 1.8044 2.0821 6.391E-03 0 0 5 -10 1.8555 2.0052 2.130E-04 0 0 6 3 1.8581 2.0730 1.542E-03 0 0 7 4 1.9094 2.1713 2.300E-06 0 0 8 5 1.9521 2.0706 5.369E-08 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 4 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 4 5 IGj: 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.62 1.86 1.91 1.95 SrtFE 2.07 2.07 2.17 2.07 MANy= 64 0 0 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 483 155 96 35 XYTy= 101.3 107.6 162.0 168.5 RTRy= 360.9 424.0 476.9 540.3 BWjj=0.31620.15270.18610.0843 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 3 MAN= 64 0 FST= 1.62 1.86 FET= 2.07 2.07 RST= 311.2 396.6 RET= 405.4 443.7 RTR= 360.9 424.0 XYT= 101.3 107.6 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 1.2019 -0.4220 1.5780 159.77 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 11 1 19 1 1 1.87 1.62 2.07 316.3 403.8 1.88 0.00 1.88 12 3 19 2 2 1.89 1.86 2.07 404.6 449.6 1.88 0.00 1.88 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.6130 1.8867 3 1.8867 1.8850 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-09 1912UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 99.80008 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=159.8 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 1.928 (±0.084) MHz, Height 276.9 (± 5.7) km. ScaleHt 28.5 (± 8.2) km SlabT 46.9 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 0.8664 100.0361 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.2344 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8850 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 1.8850 265.1883 32.3 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 5.9968 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 330.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.0651 137.5201 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 239.2037 1.7246 -23.6 31.0 -25.3 5.0 0.9 39.6 0.434 -24.2 8.1 7.4 39.1 21 254.3616 1.8519 -17.9 37.9 -22.9 7.5 -0.2 30.7 0.437 -22.1 9.1 5.8 30.2 53 270.4800 1.8782 -21.6 36.7 -21.6 7.4 -1.2 28.5 0.451 -21.2 8.7 4.5 28.1 60 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 99.80008 0.000 0.00 0.00 1.885 265.19 32.33 0.251 0.402 0.653 1.598 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 1842 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 5 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 99.80008 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111111 99.80008 998 5.6 100.3 -20.7 19.4 0.7 187.1 60.1 -19.9 47.9 6.0 181.9 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00002 0.00020 0.00056 0.00110 0.14363 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00006 0.00056 0.00155 0.00304 0.34856 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00008 0.00074 0.00204 0.00400 0.46278 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 5 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.86255 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 6 4 0.00004 0.00037 0.00103 0.00202 0.13122 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 9 4 0.00006 0.00058 0.00162 0.00318 0.18973 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 10 4 0.00016 0.00148 0.00411 0.00805 0.47736 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 DSND organized 1750 total echoes, or 95.0%; in 10 traces; of which DSND selected 1561 useful echoes, or 84.7%; in 7 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 483 25 841 1.62 2.07 1.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 311 405 361 11 -89 57 49 73 49 3 0 0 -23 -54 85 14 64 0 6 602 804 1515 -2.22 -2.76 -2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 -325 -372 -344 10 -41 69 35 71 50 5 -2 10 -9 162 63 16 63 0 3 155 362 821 1.86 2.07 1.94 1.90 0.00 0.00 397 444 424 13 -72 67 80 67 44 2 -4 16 -559 -31 107 13 0 0 4 96 455 839 1.91 2.17 2.04 1.83 1.82 0.00 478 471 477 16 -104 109 124 106 43 2 -11 12 1155 -122 110 14 0 0 5 35 560 820 1.95 2.07 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 543 528 540 19 -110 128 128 135 40 2 -6 17 -25 -194 136 13 0 0 9 130 1400 1799 -2.77 -3.03 -2.88 0.00 -2.83 0.00 -515 -502 -516 18 -82 115 30 62 47 3 -4 6 709 -134 94 14 0 0 10 60 1479 1779 -2.82 -2.96 -2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 -602 -576 -593 22 16 128 54 88 43 2 -3 11 91 -97 116 13 0 0 POL rejected 3 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 23 31 654 1.65 1.75 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 619 634 634 18 -61 90 53 64 41 2 -13 21 385 20 139 13 -699 0 8 146 1340 1797 -2.75 -3.02 -2.85 -2.78 0.00 0.00 -450 -459 -455 12 -76 93 45 92 50 4 -6 15 886 35 81 15 -40 0 7 20 1089 1641 -2.61 -2.71 -2.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 -716 -707 -703 11 -144 55 122 72 39 2 0 20 88 -245 103 14 -699 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-09 1912UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 99.80008 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/04/09 at 19:13:58.8; *********************** MMAX= 1842: DSND normal termination