Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 20.2019 LT Hour= 2.2019 CosCHI=-.3665 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 100 STARTT=1270930327 UT_dDAY= 100.84175 LT_sDAY= 99.84175 FILNM = [TK04102012] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-10 2012UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 100.84175 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/04/10 begin at 20:12:08.2 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 6465 3709 928 0 0 1618 1 512 16.5 782.5 9 4 100.84175 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 3709 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 42 15; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.985 DSND organized 3652 total echoes, or 98.5%; in 15 traces; of which DSND selected 3652 useful echoes, or 98.5%; in 15 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 9 477 1841 3653 0.00 0.00 -2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -372 15 -53 90 73 73 56 5 -1 5 0 0 59 15 0 0 8 31 1306 2027 0.00 0.00 2.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 625 16 -224 186 159 103 37 1 4 9 0 0 126 13 0 0 14 47 2927 3626 0.00 0.00 -3.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -642 25 -55 86 -17 56 42 2 0 11 0 0 130 13 0 0 13 80 2919 3655 0.00 0.00 -3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -582 18 13 89 -51 102 46 3 -4 7 0 0 103 14 0 0 12 141 2887 3697 0.00 0.00 -3.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -534 16 22 127 -21 89 51 3 -21 47 0 0 84 15 0 0 11 289 2704 3702 0.00 0.00 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -461 18 -1 81 33 96 52 4 -3 7 0 0 75 15 0 0 10 200 1978 3393 0.00 0.00 -2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -691 12 -41 91 23 97 43 3 -1 8 0 0 95 14 0 0 1 852 8 2171 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 354 11 -34 84 27 64 50 4 77 67 0 0 72 15 0 0 2 288 43 1656 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 661 16 -29 156 -11 126 43 3 -7 17 0 0 101 14 0 0 7 499 1279 3593 0.00 0.00 -2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -342 8 -20 70 8 53 52 6 -1 6 0 0 56 16 0 0 6 77 1195 1985 0.00 0.00 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 581 19 -56 117 -57 101 40 2 -1 29 0 0 114 12 0 0 5 123 1066 2029 0.00 0.00 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 516 11 9 137 28 140 41 3 3 14 0 0 120 13 0 0 4 304 896 2215 0.00 0.00 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 463 13 -20 81 5 61 45 3 -1 10 0 0 85 14 0 0 3 223 741 2008 0.00 0.00 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 363 11 -24 81 25 118 48 4 -2 10 0 0 78 15 0 0 15 21 3065 3703 0.00 0.00 -3.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -579 19 -269 104 144 98 47 2 -14 7 0 0 140 12 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.5829 2.4794 299.07 435.90 0.7143 55.0654 2 1.6582 2.0766 609.48 728.01643.9590******** 3 1.9849 2.2813 335.90 382.61 41.3464 70.9530 4 2.0384 2.4178 426.05 474.04512.6179 79.4468 5 2.1050 2.3306 509.56 519.51 27.6250-37.0885 6 2.1397 2.2954 586.22 543.59959.2166******** 7 -2.1872 -3.0877 -323.77 -389.04 1.8077198.8951 8 2.2026 2.3509 610.53 594.55**************** 9 -2.3641 -3.1874 -338.23 -425.49 47.7167179.4628 10 -2.4892 -2.9052 -656.13 -744.61126.1379-79.2313 11 -2.8564 -3.2800 -414.06 -470.72184.0860139.8568 12 -2.9440 -3.1901 -521.53 -531.76******** 21.6558 13 -2.9326 -3.1106 -577.24 -591.54-62.8071-55.1922 14 -2.9838 -3.0699 -629.73 -638.34******** 57.4052 15 -3.1107 -3.3251 -574.43 -541.35**************** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -11 12 3702 3697 -3.28 -2.94-470.7-521.5 140 -187 289 141 -12 13 3697 3655 -3.19 -2.93-531.8-577.2 22 -63 430 80 -13 14 3655 3626 -3.11 -2.98-591.5-629.7 -55 -440 510 47 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 15 12 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.51 0.47 0.33 0.42 0.25 0.17 0 0.17 0 0 0 0 2 1.00 0.24 0.22 0.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.00 0.31 0.17 0.82 0.59 0.48 0 0.27 0 0 0 0 4 1.00 0.10 0.64 0.22 0.59 0.41 0 0.39 0 0 0 0 5 1.00 0 0.78 1.00 0.13 0.69 0 0.57 0 0 0 0 6 1.00 0 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.09 0 0.60 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.52 0 0.80 0.46 0.24 0 8 1.00 0 0.53 1.00 0.86 0.63 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.88 0 0.47 0.51 0.26 0.09 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 0.24 0.12 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 0.23 0.12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.36 0 0 0.12 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 3652.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.23 0.60 0.51 0.37 0.46 0.43 0 0.57 0 0 0 0 2 0.40 0.08 0.15 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.49 0.85 0.06 0.29 0.35 0.40 0 0.47 0 0 0 0 4 0.63 0.95 0.71 0.08 0.48 0.47 0 0.59 0 0 0 0 5 0.54 0 0.65 0.52 0.03 0.41 0 0.55 0 0 0 0 6 0.57 0 0.60 0.53 0.59 0.02 0 0.45 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.14 0 0.48 0.46 0 0 8 0.43 0 0.53 0.41 0.45 0.55 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.52 0 0.13 0.37 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.54 0 0.63 0.05 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.15 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 7 6 0 9 7 0 8 6 0 9 0 10 0 11 7 7 0 12 8 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 1 2 354.345 660.596 0.070 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 1 852 1.6 2.5 354.3 2 288 1.7 2.1 660.6 2.5 341.5 633.5 0.210 -200 -2 6 -2 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 2 288 1.7 2.1 660.6 5 123 2.1 2.3 515.5 -111 2 Prox 2 288 1.7 2.1 660.6 6 77 2.1 2.3 581.5 -112 2 Prox 2 288 1.7 2.1 660.6 8 31 2.2 2.4 625.4 -112 2 2 7 10 342.452 690.693 0.008 A12M 7 499 -2.2 -3.1-342.5 10 200 -2.5 -2.9-690.7 7.5 333.2 685.2 0.051 -200 -2 7 -10 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 10 200 -2.5 -2.9-690.7 12 21 -3.1 -3.3-578.8 -113 2 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 1 852 1.6 2.5 354.3 7 499 -2.2 -3.1-342.5 1.635 0.34 -0.99 3.62-12.62 13 1 Qiojx 1 852 1.6 2.5 354.3 9 477 -2.4 -3.2-371.6 1.672 0.34 -0.91 2.16 24.32 14 1 Aiojx 1 1.4 365.7 9 2.3-399.3 1.672 0.34 -0.91 2.16 24.32 14 -1 AZOXo: [o 1x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 72.96 72.96 AZOXx: [x 9o 1] TOz,o,x= 0.00 72.96 72.96 Qiojx 1 852 1.6 2.5 354.3 11 557 -2.9 -3.1-488.6 1.205 0.34 -0.77 0.02 35.36 8 1 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 35.355 1 o 11 x 1.895 2.125 9 x 7 1.3 2.3 0.0 73.0 73.0 3 Qiojx 3 223 2.0 2.3 363.4 7 499 -2.2 -3.1-342.5 1.127 0.33 -0.94 1.77 -7.35 6 3 Qiojx 3 223 2.0 2.3 363.4 9 477 -2.4 -3.2-371.6 1.152 0.33 -0.86 1.12 34.39 7 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 34.395 9 x 3 o 1.985 2.250 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 73.0 73.0 2 Qiojx 3 223 2.0 2.3 363.4 11 557 -2.9 -3.1-488.6 1.144 0.33 -0.69 1.40 -3.67 6 3 Qiojx 4 304 2.0 2.4 462.9 7 499 -2.2 -3.1-342.5 1.094 0.27 -1.18 4.92 -4.00 4 4 Qiojx 4 304 2.0 2.4 462.9 9 477 -2.4 -3.2-371.6 1.118 0.27 -1.07 4.15 -2.24 5 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.236 9 x 4 o 2.038 2.250 1 o 7 1.6 2.5 0.0 73.0 73.0 2 Qiojx 4 304 2.0 2.4 462.9 11 557 -2.9 -3.1-488.6 1.110 0.27 -0.87 1.60 16.77 5 4 Aiojx 4 2.0 463.8 11 2.3-533.5 1.110 0.27 -0.87 1.60 16.77 5 -4 AZOXo: [o 4x11] TOz,o,x= 0.00 50.31 50.31 AZOXx: [x11o 4] TOz,o,x= 0.00 50.31 50.31 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 o 1x 9 2 3 4 o 4x11 5 6 7 8 9 x 9o 1 10 11 x11o 4 12 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 1 0.0 73.0 73.0 4 0.0 50.3 50.3 9 0.0 73.0 73.0 11 0.0 50.3 50.3 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 2.542 4 -3.194 11 9.000 0.119 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 2.5 0.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 4 16 2.54 0 2.10 3.08 Admit k 8 4 1 0 2.48 0 Add k 8 4 1 0 0 354.3 417.5 104 36 Admit k 8 4 3 0 2.28 0 Add k 8 4 3 0 0 363.4 376.4 66 59 Admit k 8 4 4 16 2.42 0 Add k 8 4 4 -16 0 462.9 465.4 131 115 Result j 8 4 16 117 6 2.22 112 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 100.84175 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 2.157 0.0665 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.542 0.000 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.58 299.07 473.4 0 0 2 3 1.98 335.90 666.7 0 0 3 7 -2.19 -323.77 708.2 0 0 4 9 -2.36 -338.23 799.6 0 0 5 4 2.04 426.05 868.5 16 0 6 2 1.66 609.48 1010.6 0 -200 7 5 2.11 509.56 1072.6 0 -111 8 11 -2.86 -414.06 1182.7 0 0 9 6 2.14 586.22 1254.3 0 -112 10 8 2.20 610.53 1344.8 0 -112 11 10 -2.49 -656.13 1633.2 0 -200 12 12 -3.11 -574.43 1786.9 0 -113 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 1x 9] JQ, k, M, C = 1 4 1o JQ, k, M, C = 1 7 9x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.5829 1.000E+00 2 3 1.9849 1.224E-04 3 4 2.0384 2.031E-01 4 7 1.1342 3.687E-02 5 9 1.3449 5.633E-02 6 11 1.8952 8.902E-03 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 7 1.1342 3.687E-02 2 9 1.3449 5.633E-02 3 1 1.5829 1.000E+00 4 11 1.8952 8.902E-03 5 3 1.9849 1.224E-04 6 4 2.0384 2.031E-01 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 -7 1.1342 2.1439 3.687E-02 0 0 2 -9 1.3449 2.2501 5.633E-02 63 0 3 1 1.5829 2.4794 1.000E+00 64 0 4 -11 1.8952 2.1250 8.902E-03 0 0 5 3 1.9849 2.2813 1.224E-04 0 0 6 4 2.0384 2.4178 2.031E-01 16 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 7 3.687E-02 k 5 3 1.224E-04 j 2 9 5.633E-02 M 2 1 o j 4 11 8.902E-03 M 4 4 o -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 3 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 4 IGj: 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.58 1.98 2.04 SrtFE 2.48 2.28 2.42 MANy= 64 61 62 NIXy= 0 0 0 ITRy= 852 223 304 XYTy= 43.6 34.6 21.2 RTRy= 354.3 363.4 462.9 BWjj=0.51460.17010.2177 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 3 O-traces: JTP 1 3 4 MAN= 64 61 62 FST= 1.58 1.98 2.04 FET= 2.48 2.28 2.42 RST= 299.1 335.9 426.0 RET= 435.9 382.6 474.0 RTR= 354.3 363.4 462.9 XYT= 43.6 34.6 21.2 Local Hour, COSCH, FCC, night START = 2.2019 -0.3665 1.6335 160.49 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 21 1 19 1 1 2.15 1.58 2.48 318.4 415.1 2.16 0.00 2.16 22 3 19 2 2 2.17 1.98 2.28 333.1 390.6 2.16 0.00 2.16 23 4 19 3 3 2.19 2.04 2.42 426.6 480.1 2.16 0.00 2.16 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.3882 2.1712 3 2.1712 2.1905 4 2.1905 2.1574 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-10 2012UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 100.84175 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START=160.5 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.186 (±0.115) MHz, Height 287.0 (±20.0) km. ScaleHt 5.9 (±****) km SlabT 49.3 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 1.8664 101.0778 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 0.0000 0.0000 2.5422 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1574 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 2.1574 285.4738 39.5 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 0.8500 6.3392 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 864.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.7075 149.8890 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 239.2037 1.7534 -49.0 114.7 -19.4 12.1 5.9 71.2 0.454 -17.2 13.7 10.7 70.9 30 254.3616 1.9505 -7.9 72.1 5.2 12.1 1.3 40.7 0.513 5.4 15.0 -0.1 39.7 75 270.4800 2.0776 -4.1 57.5 6.3 9.6 0.2 34.7 0.524 6.1 13.0 -1.4 33.6 104 287.6196 2.1560 -4.3 58.0 6.2 9.5 0.1 34.1 0.515 6.0 12.8 -1.6 33.0 113 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 100.84175 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.157 285.47 39.45 0.379 0.642 1.022 1.694 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 3709 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 100.84175 999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIQ.11111111 100.84175 998 7.7 10.5 16.7 1.6 -3.6 10.5 69.2 15.2 3.2 -7.8 10.1 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00002 0.00016 0.00045 0.00088 0.13846 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00004 0.00035 0.00097 0.00191 0.13868 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00004 0.00036 0.00099 0.00194 0.22547 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 7 4 0.00003 0.00029 0.00079 0.00156 0.10686 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 9 4 0.00002 0.00020 0.00056 0.00110 0.05267 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 11 4 0.00004 0.00034 0.00094 0.00185 0.16149 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 11 DSND organized 3652 total echoes, or 98.5%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 2912 useful echoes, or 78.5%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 852 8 2171 1.58 2.48 1.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 299 436 354 11 -34 84 27 64 50 4 77 67 1 55 72 15 64 0 3 223 741 2008 1.98 2.28 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 336 383 363 11 -24 81 25 118 48 4 -2 10 41 71 78 15 61 0 7 499 1279 3593 -2.19 -3.09 -2.60 0.00 -2.75 0.00 -324 -389 -342 8 -20 70 8 53 52 6 -1 6 2 199 56 16 62 0 9 477 1841 3653 -2.36 -3.19 -2.83 0.00 -3.04 0.00 -338 -425 -372 15 -53 90 73 73 56 5 -1 5 48 179 59 15 63 0 4 304 896 2215 2.04 2.42 2.19 2.07 0.00 0.00 426 474 463 13 -20 81 5 61 45 3 -1 10 513 79 85 14 62 0 11 557 2704 3626 -2.86 -3.07 -3.02 -2.90 0.00 0.00 -414 -638 -489 46 35 88 -31 83 50 5 -7 28 184 57 85 15 62 0 POL rejected 6 multiple- & other traces: NIX 2 288 43 1656 1.66 2.08 1.85 1.62 2.02 0.00 609 728 661 16 -29 156 -11 126 43 3 -7 17 644 -333 101 14 -200 0 5 123 1066 2029 2.11 2.33 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 510 520 516 11 9 137 28 140 41 3 3 14 28 -37 120 13 -111 0 6 77 1195 1985 2.14 2.30 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 586 544 581 19 -56 117 -57 101 40 2 -1 29 959 -228 114 12 -112 0 8 31 1306 2027 2.20 2.35 2.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 611 595 625 16 -224 186 159 103 37 1 4 9 -741 -119 126 13 -112 0 10 200 1978 3393 -2.49 -2.91 -2.68 -2.75 0.00 0.00 -656 -745 -691 12 -41 91 23 97 43 3 -1 8 126 -79 95 14 -200 0 12 21 3065 3703 -3.11 -3.33 -3.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 -574 -541 -579 31 -269 87 144 95 47 2 -14 39 -167 -141 140 12 -113 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-10 2012UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 100.84175 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/04/10 at 20:15:45.8; *********************** MMAX= 3709: DSND normal termination