Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 2.7019 LT Hour= 8.7019 CosCHI=0.4347 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 101 STARTT=1270953727 UT_dDAY= 101.11258 LT_sDAY= 101.11258 FILNM = [TK04110242] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-11 0242UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 101.11258 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/04/11 begin at 02:42:06.9 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 4963 2268 901 0 0 1564 1 512 16.5 782.5 8 4 101.11258 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2268 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 35 12; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.945 DSND organized 2144 total echoes, or 94.5%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 2144 useful echoes, or 94.5%; in 12 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 8 26 1499 1631 0.00 0.00 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 692 18 81 50 42 59 45 3 10 3 0 0 104 13 0 0 6 455 1070 2256 0.00 0.00 -5.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -287 4 2 22 -8 17 50 6 1 2 0 0 52 16 0 0 11 64 1903 2261 0.00 0.00 -5.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -337 11 -40 32 -8 31 37 3 -4 3 0 0 93 14 0 0 10 82 1747 2246 0.00 0.00 -5.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -625 10 -2 47 -43 52 33 4 -1 5 0 0 127 13 0 0 9 48 1607 1792 0.00 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 441 18 45 23 33 42 48 7 6 6 0 0 90 15 0 0 1 275 1 275 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 112 1 -11 28 -2 20 42 3 -2 18 0 0 113 14 0 0 7 62 1209 1820 0.00 0.00 4.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 350 8 47 28 87 40 41 3 2 5 0 0 122 14 0 0 2 611 283 1727 0.00 0.00 3.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 259 3 10 18 -9 15 54 6 1 3 0 0 41 17 0 0 5 33 1022 1556 0.00 0.00 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 288 2 43 38 -5 36 39 2 0 8 0 0 120 14 0 0 4 33 524 741 0.00 0.00 3.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 648 1 -24 58 -6 44 42 2 3 9 0 0 97 14 0 0 3 413 358 1744 0.00 0.00 3.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 514 6 -5 43 -41 56 44 4 2 10 0 0 79 16 0 0 12 42 1904 2262 0.00 0.00 -5.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -366 9 66 34 110 35 38 6 -4 5 0 0 86 15 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.4835 2.4700 104.44 132.99 -8.7157 95.2462 2 2.8056 4.9619 253.87 382.84********441.9862 3 3.0103 4.7524 424.73 595.85******** 2.4475 4 3.2339 3.3701 640.91 657.57 13.3078153.4543 5 4.2938 4.6856 285.80 302.45 34.7858151.3487 6 -4.1877 -5.7418 -239.84 -400.19 15.4707496.4721 7 4.5827 4.9597 334.99 402.56113.3032 21.1974 8 4.8095 4.8417 700.51 707.39522.4219415.9420 9 4.9278 5.0412 437.63 421.79********184.6260 10 -5.1658 -5.6572 -586.97 -697.36 92.4969136.7436 11 -5.4511 -5.6919 -334.37 -355.84203.7770301.6045 12 -5.5897 -5.7246 -375.71 -418.65149.9991295.6911 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -7 9 1820 1792 4.96 4.93 402.6 437.6 21 -350 62 48 -6 12 2256 2262 -5.74 -5.59-400.2-375.7 496 150 455 42 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 12 10 -------------------------------------- Break E/Es at cusp --------------- j is ie fis fie JBWX TBWX TBFR TBWj ixR FxR HxR 1 1 275 1.4224 2.5675 1 0.3860 0.3860 0.2326 1 275 2.5675 145.31 BreakE cusp: 1 2.3833 123.81 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.51 0.81 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.18 0 0 0 3 0 1.00 0.41 0.08 0.22 0 0.10 0 0 0 4 0 1.00 1.00 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1.00 1.00 0 0.09 0 0.26 0 0 0 6 0 1.00 0 0 0 0.01 1.00 0 0 0 7 0 0.83 0.37 0 0.22 0.07 0.11 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0.42 1.00 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.86 0.06 1.00 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.32 0.16 0.36 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 2144.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.28 0.62 0.48 0.79 0 0.63 0 0 0 3 0 0.38 0.19 0.54 0.57 0 0.39 0 0 0 4 0 0.52 0.46 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.21 0.43 0 0.02 0 0.48 0 0 0 6 0 1.00 0 0 0 0.01 1.00 0 0 0 7 0 0.37 0.61 0 0.52 0 0.05 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04 0 0.31 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.69 0 0.23 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 6 0 7 8 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 2 3 259.384 514.172 0.009 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 2 611 2.8 5.0 259.4 3 413 3.0 4.8 514.2 20.0 255.5 493.8 0.276 -200 -2 21 -3 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 3 413 3.0 4.8 514.2 6 26 4.8 4.8 692.1 -112 2 2 2 4 259.384 647.600 0.221 3 2 4 259.384 647.600 0.183 2 10 8 288.705 624.590 0.079 A12M 10 497 -4.2 -5.7-288.7 8 82 -5.2 -5.7-624.6 8.0 334.1 630.7 0.198 -200 -2 8 -8 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 4 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 640.91 657.57 647.60 RELsr, RELer = 0.0104 0.0153; TOL = 0.030 RejectHiFlat: j, NIXj = 6 -699 RST, RET, RTR = 700.51 707.39 692.10 RELsr, RELer = 0.0121 0.0219; TOL = 0.030 PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -1 275 1.484 2.470 111.7 -2 611 2.788 4.962 259.4 0.318 1 275 1.484 2.470 111.7 2 611 2.788 4.962 259.4 0.318 2.63 JNZO: Is j z//o? RD=Rz/Ro~.94; build TO; if>8 make new jz: JNZO j ISTj IETj ITRj FSTj FETj RTRj YRTj YRTz RD Qoz CJG TO NB jz ISTz IETz ITRz FSTz FETz RTRz Qjzo 7 1209 1792 110 4.6 5.0 356.49 12.00 6.38 0.72 3.19 -1.00 -1.00 1 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 2 611 2.8 5.0 259.4 9 64 -5.5 -5.7-337.0 1.100 0.22 -0.92 0.45 60.00 9 2 Aiojx 2 4.5 318.0 9 4.9-346.4 1.100 0.22 -0.92 0.45 60.00 9 -2 AZOXo: [o 2x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 180.00 180.00 AZOXx: [x 9o 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 180.00 180.00 Qiojx 2 611 2.8 5.0 259.4 10 497 -4.2 -5.7-288.7 1.522 0.22 -0.93 1.55414.00 34 2 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 413.998 2 o 10 x 3.293 4.860 9 x 7 4.6 4.8 0.0 180.0 180.0 3 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 2 4 [o 2x 9] Tzox= 0.00 180.00 180.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 2 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [x 9o 2] Tzox= 0.00 180.00 0.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 Aiojx 2 3.3 274.9 10 5.0-297.9 1.522 0.22 -0.93 1.55414.00 34 -2 AZOXo: [o 2x10] TOz,o,x= 0.00 1241.99 1241.99 AZOXx: [x10o 2] TOz,o,x= 0.00 1241.99 1241.99 Qiojx 5 33 4.3 4.7 288.4 9 64 -5.5 -5.7-337.0 1.082 0.24 -0.87 0.28 10.00 4 5 Aiojx 5 4.5 301.2 9 4.8-347.2 1.082 0.24 -0.87 0.28 10.00 4 -5 AZOXo: [o 5x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 30.00 30.00 AZOXx: [x 9o 5] TOz,o,x= 0.00 30.00 30.00 Qiojx 5 33 4.3 4.7 288.4 10 497 -4.2 -5.7-288.7 1.208 0.24 -0.91 1.38 39.60 8 5 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 39.598 5 o 10 x 4.294 4.686 9 x 7 4.6 4.8 0.0 30.0 30.0 3 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 5 4 [o 5x 9] Tzox= 0.00 30.00 30.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 5 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [x 9o 5] Tzox= 0.00 30.00 0.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 39.598 10 x 5 o 4.294 4.686 2 o 7 2.8 5.0 0.0 1242.0 1242.0 2 Qiojx 7 110 4.6 5.0 356.5 9 64 -5.5 -5.7-337.0 1.100 0.49 -1.04 2.59 1.12 5 7 Aiojx 7 4.5 364.7 9 4.9-351.8 1.100 0.49 -1.04 2.59 1.12 5 -7 AZOXo: [o 7x 9] TOz,o,x= 0.00 3.35 3.35 AZOXx: [x 9o 7] TOz,o,x= 0.00 3.35 3.35 Qiojx 7 110 4.6 5.0 356.5 10 497 -4.2 -5.7-288.7 1.141 0.49 -0.99 0.13 6.12 6 7 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 6.124 7 o 10 x 4.583 4.860 9 x 7 4.6 4.8 0.0 3.4 3.4 3 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 7 4 [o 7x 9] Tzox= 0.00 3.35 3.35 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 7 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 DAZITb4 j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [x 9o 7] Tzox= 0.00 3.35 0.00 DAZITaf j, k, AZOX= 9 4 [ ] Tzox= 0.00 0.00 0.00 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 6.124 10 x 7 o 4.583 4.860 2 o 7 2.8 5.0 0.0 1242.0 1242.0 2 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 o 2x10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x10o 2 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 2 0.0 1242.0 1242.0 10 0.0 1242.0 1242.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -1 275 1.484 2.470 111.7 -2 611 2.788 4.962 259.4 0.318 1 275 1.484 2.470 111.7 2 611 2.788 4.962 259.4 0.318 2.63 QPNOX: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 -88.000 0 JEFSE: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 2.567 1 88.000 0 88.000 0 2.788 2 -4.155 10 MANIX: FZE IEZ FOE IEO FXE IEX DOZ IFZ DOX IFO DXZ IFX 0.000 0 2.678 1 0.000 0 2.678 0 2.678 2 1.599 0 sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2.6777 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 5.157 2 -5.823 10 9.000 0.039 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 10 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 2.678 0.000 0.0 5.2 -5.8 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 3 1 18 2.68 0 2.21 3.24 Admit k 3 1 1 18 2.47 0 Add k 3 1 1 -18 0 111.7 120.9 10 0 jj OK j 4 2 32 2.68 0 2.21 3.24 Admit k 4 2 2 32 4.96 0 Add k 4 2 2 -32 0 259.4 221.8 20 1 jj OK j 8 2 32 5.16 0 4.26 6.24 Admit k 8 2 2 32 4.96 0 Add k 8 2 2 -32 0 259.4 306.4 37 7 Admit k 8 2 5 0 4.69 0 Add k 8 2 5 0 0 288.4 293.5 1 7 Admit k 8 2 7 0 5.04 0 Add k 8 2 7 0 0 356.5 401.8 36 20 Result j 8 2 32 33 4 4.79 18 jj OK j 9 10 32 5.82 19 4.81 7.04 Admit k 9 10 9 0 -5.69 19 Add k 9 10 9 0 19-337.0-347.8 10 1 Admit k 9 10 10 32 -5.72 19 Add k 9 10 10 -32 19-288.7-321.7 119 37 Result j 9 10 32 68 9 5.15 53 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 101.11258 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 5.157 0.1288 5.560 0.0685 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 2.678 0.000 0.000 5.157 -5.823 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.48 104.44 154.9 32 0 2 2 2.81 253.87 712.3 32 0 3 10 -4.19 -239.84 1004.4 32 0 4 5 4.29 285.80 1227.2 0 0 5 3 3.01 424.73 1278.6 0 -200 6 7 4.58 334.99 1535.2 0 0 7 9 -5.45 -334.37 1822.7 0 0 8 4 3.23 640.91 2072.6 0 -699 9 8 -5.17 -586.97 3032.2 0 -200 10 6 4.81 700.51 3369.1 0 -699 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 2x10] JQ, k, M, C = 2 4 2o JQ, k, M, C = 2 7 10x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.4835 6.368E-05 2 2 2.8056 1.000E+00 3 5 4.2938 6.417E-09 4 7 4.5827 1.274E-09 5 9 4.5824 3.267E-09 6 10 3.2926 3.452E-01 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 1 1.4835 6.368E-05 2 2 2.8056 1.000E+00 3 10 3.2926 3.452E-01 4 5 4.2938 6.417E-09 5 9 4.5824 3.267E-09 6 7 4.5827 1.274E-09 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 1 1.4835 2.4700 6.368E-05 32 0 2 2 2.8056 4.9619 1.000E+00 64 0 3 -10 3.2926 4.8598 3.452E-01 63 0 4 5 4.2938 4.6856 6.417E-09 0 0 5 -9 4.5824 4.8266 3.267E-09 0 0 6 7 4.5827 5.0412 1.274E-09 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 1 6.368E-05 j 2 2 1.000E+00 M 2 10 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 4 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 2 5 7 IGj: 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.48 2.81 4.29 4.58 SrtFE 2.47 4.96 4.69 5.04 MANy= 62 64 0 0 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 275 611 33 110 XYTy= 11.3 13.2 42.8 97.9 RTRy= 111.7 259.4 288.4 356.5 BWjj=0.23260.50840.09240.1081 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 2 MAN= 62 64 FST= 1.48 2.81 FET= 2.47 4.96 RST= 104.4 253.9 RET= 133.0 382.8 RTR= 111.7 259.4 XYT= 11.3 13.2 Daytime START = 90.00 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 31 1 19 1 1 2.57 1.42 2.47 104.4 133.0 2.68 2.68 5.16 32 put FOE=FLO= 2.678 71 2 19 2 2 4.97 2.81 4.96 264.1 385.7 5.15 2.68 5.16 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.4453 2.6777 2 2.8038 5.1567 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-11 0242UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 101.11258 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START= 90.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.608 (±0.110) MHz, Height 110.3 (± 1.2) km. ScaleHt -8.1 (± 1.4) km SlabT 11.1 km 2 Iter. Valley 22.6 km wide, 0.07 MHz deep. devn 2.76 km. 7 terms fit 9 O + 0 X + 4. hx= 144.7 PEAK 5.081 (±0.195) MHz, Height 232.5 (± 7.9) km. ScaleHt-42.6 (± 7.2) km SlabT 73.3 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 8.3664 101.3486 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 2.6777 0.0000 5.1567 5.8231 0.0000 0.0000 5.1567 5.5599 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 5.1567 250.4740 67.3 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 0.9478 0.9816 0.7905 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 832.0000 4.3922 224.3153 2.1216 300.2192 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 95.1734 1.7278 -16.7 39.2 -6.8 8.1 3.3 37.2 0.428 -5.7 10.6 5.0 36.6 11 101.2043 2.3455 -10.9 25.7 -15.3 7.0 0.8 40.2 0.394 -14.5 14.6 4.8 38.1 38 107.6174 2.6115 -9.8 23.3 -5.7 6.9 1.6 52.0 0.414 -5.1 17.9 3.0 49.3 44 114.4369 2.6743 -9.8 23.3 -5.7 6.9 1.6 52.0 0.414 -5.1 17.9 3.0 49.3 44 137.5994 2.9344 13.0 89.4 -3.8 9.8 3.8 158.2 0.368 -2.7 49.2 4.6 150.7 8 146.3187 3.2065 45.2 82.0 33.6 4.8 2.3 83.7 0.454 33.0 25.0 -6.5 80.0 23 155.5906 3.5060 24.1 57.7 25.4 3.2 2.0 90.8 0.587 25.0 25.8 -4.7 87.1 37 165.4501 3.7757 13.7 38.3 22.9 2.4 2.1 74.9 0.727 22.6 21.0 -3.9 72.0 51 175.9342 4.0490 3.5 44.5 19.0 2.3 2.2 74.2 0.750 18.9 20.7 -2.8 71.3 62 187.0828 4.3445 0.2 38.6 11.3 2.0 2.1 65.6 0.760 11.5 18.3 -0.9 63.0 75 198.9379 4.6627 -1.1 43.1 11.3 2.2 1.9 72.0 0.735 11.4 20.2 -1.1 69.1 88 211.5442 4.8956 -1.3 44.3 9.5 2.1 1.3 71.1 0.747 9.5 20.0 -1.3 68.2 97 224.9492 5.0512 0.6 47.1 9.5 2.1 1.1 70.4 0.743 9.5 19.8 -1.4 67.6 100 239.2037 5.1323 0.6 47.1 9.5 2.1 1.1 70.4 0.743 9.5 19.8 -1.4 67.6 100 254.3616 5.1530 0.6 47.1 9.5 2.1 1.1 70.4 0.743 9.5 19.8 -1.4 67.6 100 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 101.11258 2.678 113.63 14.17 5.157 250.47 67.29 3.127 6.259 9.386 2.001 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2268 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 5 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 101.11258 999 1.4 20.6 -7.7 5.6 0.3 29.0 26.7 -7.4 8.8 2.3 28.1 RIQ.11111111 101.11258 998 -0.6 19.8 0.2 1.2 0.9 30.9 79.4 0.4 8.6 0.8 29.6 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00002 0.00006 0.00011 0.48369 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00003 0.00023 0.00064 0.00125 0.07787 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 5 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.37970 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 5 7 4 0.00034 0.00307 0.00854 0.01674 0.22095 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 9 4 0.00021 0.00186 0.00516 0.01011 0.15897 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 9 10 4 0.00000 0.00004 0.00012 0.00023 0.06747 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 10 DSND organized 2144 total echoes, or 94.5%; in 10 traces; of which DSND selected 1590 useful echoes, or 70.1%; in 6 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 275 1 275 1.48 2.47 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 104 133 112 1 -11 28 -2 20 42 3 -2 18 -9 95 113 14 62 0 2 611 283 1727 2.81 4.96 3.79 2.79 5.16 2.63 254 383 259 3 10 18 -9 15 54 6 1 3 -917 442 41 17 64 0 10 497 1070 2262 -4.19 -5.72 -5.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 -240 -419 -289 6 5 25 -5 23 49 7 1 2 15 296 54 16 63 0 5 33 1022 1556 4.29 4.69 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 286 302 288 2 43 38 -5 36 39 2 0 8 35 151 120 14 0 0 7 110 1209 1792 4.58 5.04 4.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 335 422 356 11 53 31 83 38 44 6 2 5 113 185 107 15 0 0 9 64 1903 2261 -5.45 -5.69 -5.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 -334 -356 -337 11 -40 32 -8 31 37 3 -4 3 204 302 93 14 0 0 POL rejected 4 multiple- & other traces: NIX 3 413 358 1744 3.01 4.75 3.59 3.05 0.00 0.00 425 596 514 6 -5 43 -41 56 44 4 2 10 -348 2 79 16 -200 0 4 33 524 741 3.23 3.37 3.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 641 658 648 1 -24 58 -6 44 42 2 3 9 13 153 97 14 -699 0 8 82 1747 2246 -5.17 -5.66 -5.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 -587 -697 -625 11 -2 48 -43 53 33 4 -1 5 92 137 127 13 -200 0 6 26 1499 1631 4.81 4.84 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 701 707 692 18 81 50 42 59 45 3 10 3 522 416 104 13 -699 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-04-11 0242UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 101.11258 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/04/11 at 02:45:37.2; *********************** MMAX= 2268: DSND normal termination