Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 6.7019 LT Hour= 12.7019 CosCHI=0.8293 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 158 STARTT=1275892927 UT_dDAY= 158.27925 LT_sDAY= 158.27925 FILNM = [TK06070642] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-06-07 0642UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 158.27925 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/06/07 begin at 06:43:37.5 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5104 2020 990 0 0 1982 1 512 16.5 782.5 7 4 158.27925 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2020 CLAZZ: NTRY = 1; CLZ = 4.0; JM, JMAX = 59 11; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.906 DSND organized 1830 total echoes, or 90.6%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 1830 useful echoes, or 90.6%; in 11 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 7 60 1325 1753 0.00 0.00 5.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 689 4 20 23 -45 36 38 2 4 4 0 0 88 13 0 0 6 56 1313 1897 0.00 0.00 -5.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -203 2 -3 7 -7 19 34 3 5 3 0 0 114 13 0 0 10 22 1827 1948 0.00 0.00 -6.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -103 1 -4 21 -12 31 32 3 2 4 0 0 109 13 0 0 9 52 1716 1903 0.00 0.00 -5.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -377 2 7 11 39 43 33 2 0 5 0 0 107 13 0 0 8 20 1603 1785 0.00 0.00 5.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 734 0 -38 2 -86 1 35 2 -2 3 0 0 107 12 0 0 1 270 1 270 0.00 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 101 1 -12 18 8 20 41 2 -3 15 0 0 91 14 0 0 2 567 271 1317 0.00 0.00 3.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 102 0 -2 11 -6 7 56 6 0 4 0 0 30 16 0 0 5 186 1100 1695 0.00 0.00 4.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 342 3 11 18 -6 27 49 9 1 3 0 0 46 19 0 0 4 272 1099 1932 0.00 0.00 -5.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -103 0 0 3 -3 6 52 7 1 1 0 0 39 16 0 0 3 302 407 1502 0.00 0.00 4.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 201 1 0 20 -20 25 40 4 2 7 0 0 85 14 0 0 11 23 1951 2015 0.00 0.00 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 151 0 -8 2 -15 10 63 2 -2 2 0 0 170 11 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.9182 2.5741 98.62 104.38 7.9855 27.6417 2 2.6545 4.6992 108.31 101.67 13.3258 3.5256 3 3.2908 4.9180 201.05 202.99 -7.1717 -1.3169 4 -4.5266 -6.0066 -103.50 -102.93-10.9318 -0.7315 5 4.5200 5.3340 338.17 410.12********534.9827 6 -5.1260 -5.4256 -202.90 -202.77 4.3416 1.3643 7 4.8855 5.1684 654.41 712.80 89.2484225.4826 8 5.4756 5.5137 741.11 741.82 26.7886 NaN 9 -5.4936 -5.8061 -378.79 -372.97-61.7917 12.2132 10 -6.0544 -6.2198 -102.64 -103.51 2.2564 6.9746 11 7.6902 7.8847 151.26 151.14 0.9135 -4.2195 JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs -1 2 270 1317 2.57 2.65 104.4 108.3 28 13 270 567 -7 8 1753 1785 5.17 5.48 712.8 741.1 225 27 60 20 -4 10 1932 1948 -6.01 -6.05-102.9-102.6 -1 2 272 22 Trace Consolidation; old, NEW JMAX = 11 8 -------------------------------------- Break E/Es at cusp --------------- j is ie fis fie JBWX TBWX TBFR TBWj ixR FxR HxR 1 1 1317 1.8412 4.7984 1 1.9989 1.9989 0.4661 1 289 2.8075 111.70 BreakE cusp: 1 2.8075 110.38 NIX with -55, new Es trace # 9 from old # 1 7 1099 1948 -4.4101 -6.2421 7 0.1793 0.1793 0.2838 7 11 1.8781 108.85 BreakE cusp: 7 4.4541-102.67 NIX with -55, new Es trace #10 from old # 7 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.27 0.24 0 0.02 0 0 0 0.87 0 3 0 0.49 0.14 0 0.55 0 0 0 0.22 0 4 0 0 0 0.05 0 0 1.00 0 0 1.00 5 0 0.05 0.71 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.05 1.00 0 0 1.00 7 0 0 0 0.18 0 0.18 0.28 0 0 0.91 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 9 0 0.76 0.10 0 0 0 0 0 0.31 0 10 0 0 0 0.19 0 0.20 1.00 0 0 0.26 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 1830.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.17 0.27 0 0.24 0 0 0 0.39 0 3 0 0.73 0.10 0 0.57 0 0 0 0.54 0 4 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0.32 5 0 0.76 0.43 0 0.04 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 1.00 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 9 0 0.61 0.46 0 0 0 0 0 0.30 0 10 0 0 0 0.68 0 0 0 0 0 0.16 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 12 0 10 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 2 3 201.490 342.327 0.163 2 3 5 342.327 694.727 0.015 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 3 186 4.5 5.3 342.3 5 80 4.9 5.5 694.7 8.5 347.9 693.4 1.000 -200 -2 6 -5 2 7 4 103.940 203.037 0.024 3 7 6 103.940 376.923 0.189 4 7 6 103.940 376.923 0.098 2 9 2 101.802 201.490 0.010 A12M 9 547 2.8 4.7 101.8 2 302 3.3 4.9 201.5 21.5 100.0 196.8 0.030 -200 -2 17 -2 3 9 3 101.802 342.327 0.114 4 9 3 101.802 342.327 0.173 2 10 4 102.642 203.037 0.011 3 10 6 102.642 376.923 0.201 4 10 6 102.642 376.923 0.085 PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES JNZO: Is j z//o? RD=Rz/Ro~.94; build TO; if>8 make new jz: JNZO j ISTj IETj ITRj FSTj FETj RTRj YRTj YRTz RD Qoz CJG TO NB jz ISTz IETz ITRz FSTz FETz RTRz Qjzo 2 407 1502 302 3.3 4.9 201.49 -4.25 -5.59 1.00 0.64 8.00 24.00 9 Ajzo 2 758 1502 208 3.9 4.9 201.8 11 407 741 94 3.3 3.8 201.0 AZOXo: [o 2z11] TOz,o,x= 24.00 24.00 0.00 AZOXz: [z11o 2] TOz,o,x= 24.00 24.00 0.00 Qjzo 3 1100 1695 186 4.5 5.3 342.33 -5.34 3.82 0.87 2.00 -2.00 -3.46 3 End JNZO; old, new JMAX = 10 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 3 186 4.5 5.3 342.3 4 56 -5.1 -5.4-203.0 1.138 0.24 -1.64 10.50 -5.59 5 3 Qiojx 3 186 4.5 5.3 342.3 6 52 -5.5 -5.8-376.9 1.100 0.24 -0.88 0.54 46.67 8 3 Aiojx 3 4.6 329.2 6 5.0-375.0 1.100 0.24 -0.88 0.54 46.67 8 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x 6] TOz,o,x= 0.00 140.01 140.01 AZOXx: [x 6o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 140.01 140.01 Qiojx 3 186 4.5 5.3 342.3 10 284 -4.7 -6.2-102.6 1.220 0.24 -3.40 46.36-30.00 16 3 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -30.000 3 o 10 x 4.520 5.334 6 x 7 4.6 4.9 0.0 140.0 140.0 3 Qiojx 9 547 2.8 4.7 101.8 4 56 -5.1 -5.4-203.0 1.225 0.19 -0.50 6.04-14.92 11 9 Qiojx 9 547 2.8 4.7 101.8 6 52 -5.5 -5.8-376.9 1.052 0.19 -0.27 9.25 -3.00 4 9 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -3.000 6 x 9 o 4.625 4.699 3 o 7 4.5 5.3 0.0 140.0 140.0 2 Qiojx 9 547 2.8 4.7 101.8 7 10 -4.5 -6.2-103.9 1.013 0.19 -0.95 1.14 -0.50 1 9 Qiojx 11 94 3.3 3.8 201.0 7 10 -4.5 -6.2-103.9 1.013 0.18 -1.90 14.65 -0.50 1 11 Qiojx 11 94 3.3 3.8 201.0 10 284 -4.7 -6.2-102.6 1.051 0.18 -1.96 15.32 -1.41 2 11 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 o 2z11 3 o 3x 6 4 5 6 x 6o 3 7 8 9 10 11 z11o 2 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 2 24.0 24.0 0.0 3 0.0 140.0 140.0 6 0.0 140.0 140.0 11 24.0 24.0 0.0 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 7 103.50 103.51 103.94 0.0043 0.0041 -47 11 201.05 200.82 201.01 0.0002 0.0010 -46 4 202.90 202.77 203.04 0.0007 0.0013 -46 8 151.26 151.14 151.33 0.0005 0.0013 -47 ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES QPNOX: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 -88.000 0 JEFSE: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 2.807 1 88.000 0 88.000 0 4.641 3 -5.432 6 MANIX: FZE IEZ FOE IEO FXE IEX DOZ IFZ DOX IFO DXZ IFX 0.000 0 2.807 1 -5.452 0 2.807 0 1.776 3 3.853 6 sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 2.8075 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 5.426 3 0.000 0 9.000 9.000 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 1 3 0 6 0 3 0 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 2.807 -5.452 0.0 5.4 0.0 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 3 1 18 2.81 0 2.32 3.40 Admit k 3 1 1 18 2.65 0 Add k 3 1 1 -18 0 102.0 103.7 23 0 jj OK j 4 3 34 2.81 0 2.32 3.40 jj OK j 8 3 34 5.43 0 4.48 6.56 Admit k 8 3 3 34 5.33 0 Add k 8 3 3 -34 0 342.3 351.2 31 2 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 158.27925 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 2.807 -5.452 0.000 5.426 0.000 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.92 98.62 189.2 18 0 2 9 2.84 106.86 303.5 0 -55 3 7 -4.53 -103.50 468.5 0 -47 4 10 -4.65 -102.60 477.3 0 -55 5 11 3.29 201.05 661.6 0 -46 6 2 3.88 200.39 778.3 0 -200 7 4 -5.13 -202.90 1040.1 0 -46 8 8 7.69 151.26 1163.2 0 -47 9 3 4.52 338.17 1528.5 34 0 10 6 -5.49 -378.79 2080.9 0 0 11 5 4.89 654.41 3197.1 0 -200 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 3x 6] JQ, k, M, C = 3 4 3o JQ, k, M, C = 3 7 6x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.9182 1.906E-02 2 3 4.5200 1.000E+00 3 4 4.2520 -9.840E-04 4 6 4.6255 5.610E-03 5 7 3.6404 -1.958E-03 6 8 7.6902 -3.760E-04 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 1 1.9182 1.906E-02 2 7 3.6404 -1.958E-03 3 4 4.2520 -9.840E-04 4 3 4.5200 1.000E+00 5 6 4.6255 5.610E-03 6 8 7.6902 -3.760E-04 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 1 1.9182 2.6545 1.906E-02 18 0 2 -7 3.6404 5.3610 -1.958E-03 0 -47 3 -4 4.2520 4.5565 -9.840E-04 0 -46 4 3 4.5200 5.3340 1.000E+00 64 0 5 -6 4.6255 4.9424 5.610E-03 63 0 6 8 7.6902 7.8847 -3.760E-04 0 -47 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 1 1 1.906E-02 j 4 3 1.000E+00 M 4 6 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 2 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 3 IGj: 0 0 SrtFS 1.92 4.52 SrtFE 2.65 5.33 MANy= 62 64 NIXy= 0 0 ITRy= 290 186 XYTy= 12.5 12.2 RTRy= 102.0 342.3 BWjj=0.12340.1364 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 2 O-traces: JTP 1 3 MAN= 62 64 FST= 1.92 4.52 FET= 2.65 5.33 RST= 98.6 338.2 RET= 108.3 410.1 RTR= 102.0 342.3 XYT= 12.5 12.2 Daytime START = 90.00 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 21 1 0 1 1 2.63 1.84 2.65 98.6 108.3 2.81 2.81 5.43 22 put FOE=FLO= 2.807 35 -6 8 2 1 2.81 -5.43 -5.88 -384.2 -378.6 47 3 0 3 2 5.35 4.52 5.33 357.5 432.0 5.42 2.81 5.43 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.8527 2.8075 3 4.4403 5.4261 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-06-07 0642UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 158.27925 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START= 90.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 3.078 (±0.485) MHz, Height 102.5 (± 2.2) km. ScaleHt -5.3 (± 1.0) km SlabT 7.1 km 8 Iter. Valley 16.9 km wide, 0.10 MHz deep. devn 1.12 km. 10 terms fit 7 O +12 X + 4. hx= 229.1 PEAK 5.466 (±0.013) MHz, Height 261.0 (± 0.7) km. ScaleHt 35.9 (± 0.8) km SlabT 92.9 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 12.3664 158.5153 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 2.8075 5.4522 5.4261 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 5.4261 229.6218 47.3 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 1.0000 0.7308 0.8632 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 317.0000 4.1070 196.9237 0.8964 7.7953 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 12 HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 89.5019 2.0043 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 95.1734 2.7945 -0.4 117.1 1.7 8.1 1.7 102.5 0.385 2.0 30.5 1.2 98.2 46 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 12 165.4501 4.5527 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 175.9342 4.7021 15.2 26.1 -34.4 2.6 6.4 24.1 0.628 -31.6 6.5 15.1 23.3 3 187.0828 4.8947 -37.1 136.0 -12.5 3.6 3.9 12.2 0.641 -11.0 4.8 7.0 11.8 12 198.9379 5.1239 -1.8 85.1 -27.3 2.6 1.9 82.5 0.696 -25.9 22.8 8.9 79.4 21 211.5442 5.3125 0.7 79.3 -16.2 3.0 1.7 81.7 0.690 -15.2 23.3 5.8 78.4 27 224.9492 5.4123 1.8 81.9 -14.1 2.8 1.4 71.7 0.708 -13.2 20.4 5.0 68.8 30 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 158.27925 3.428 107.38 11.63 5.426 229.62 47.31 3.431 4.872 8.303 1.420 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2020 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 158.27925 999 2.1 13.0 -1.1 1.0 1.1 5.1 34.9 -0.7 1.8 1.3 4.9 RIQ.11111111 158.27925 998 -16.4 302.5 13.9 30.7 3.7 337.4 68.3 14.4 106.4 0.0 321.6 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00001 0.00002 0.00005 0.34104 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 3 4 0.00012 0.00109 0.00303 0.00594 0.13259 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 6 4 0.00008 0.00069 0.00193 0.00378 0.19239 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 6 DSND organized 1830 total echoes, or 90.6%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 528 useful echoes, or 26.1%; in 3 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 290 1 290 1.92 2.65 2.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 108 102 1 -11 19 5 18 41 2 -2 14 8 13 92 14 62 0 3 186 1100 1695 4.52 5.33 4.96 4.64 5.43 0.00 338 410 342 3 11 22 -6 30 49 9 1 3 -150 535 46 19 64 0 6 52 1716 1903 -5.49 -5.81 -5.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 -379 -373 -377 2 7 11 39 43 33 2 0 5 -62 12 107 13 63 0 POL rejected 8 multiple- & other traces: NIX 9 547 291 1317 2.84 4.70 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 107 102 102 0 2 7 -7 7 57 5 2 2 -88 4 28 15 -55 0 7 10 1099 1142 -4.53 -6.22 -4.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 -103 -104 -104 1 21 1 7 13 50 3 0 1 -11 7 66 12 -47 0 10 284 1178 1948 -4.65 -6.19 -5.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 -103 -103 -103 0 -2 3 -5 6 51 8 1 1 -2 10 42 17 -55 0 11 94 407 741 3.29 3.80 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 201 201 201 1 -1 31 -16 33 42 4 1 10 -7 -1 92 15 -46 0 2 208 758 1502 3.88 4.92 4.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 200 203 202 1 0 13 -21 17 39 4 3 5 -4 -1 83 14 -200 0 4 56 1313 1897 -5.13 -5.43 -5.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 -203 -203 -203 2 -3 7 -7 19 34 3 5 3 4 1 114 13 -46 0 8 23 1951 2015 7.69 7.88 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 151 151 151 1 -8 2 -15 11 63 2 -2 1 1 -4 170 11 -47 0 5 80 1325 1785 4.89 5.51 5.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 654 742 695 4 12 21 -60 31 37 3 3 3 89 0 92 13 -200 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-06-07 0642UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 158.27925 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/06/07 at 06:45:31.4; *********************** MMAX= 2020: DSND normal termination