Station_WP cRP cVS cPP cXL cYL WKMxKC TAU 0.3629 0.1623 0.8268 0.0129 0.0140 0.4164 0.01 IDENT: UT Hour= 13.4519 LT Hour= 19.4519 CosCHI=0.1733 YEAR=2010 UT DAY of year= 158 STARTT=1275917227 UT_dDAY= 158.56050 LT_sDAY= 158.56050 FILNM = [TK06071327] set in IDENT > FSREAD, # 0 RIQ.11111111; MMAX = 860160 Ident: [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-06-07 1327UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 158.56050 RIQ.11111111] Today is: 2010/06/07 begin at 13:28:37.5 IDEBUG, IDTA (DBMS Control) = 4 1 CTYPE-Mode Constants: CTYPE STYPE RLEN RSNDG RTYPE SPRMP CYCLS ITIKS PPSET Lsecs [BP ] 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 8****** Analysis Constants: DXX DYY FGYROF DIP TAU NDTAU DMT EDFI WKMxKC NSECF DLGF 0.0800 0.0800 1.5990 74.93 0.0100 32 0.96 0.00.41638 0 0.0000000 Analysis Control: AZnt NDIM NUMV INCV UNIP MLTC KONTRL 0 -3 20 5 21 0 BKZPI MINF MAXF MINT MAXT MINR MAXR PPLM IMPT EPLM RDBW NMBR MMIN NUMVF INCV UPMO Q 81024000 1 999999 10 778 90 0 20 1 0 1 20 5 D B 0.00 PRETEC MAXT MMAXb4 MMAX NEPB NPPB NDBL NXYB JPCT MTOA TOAn TOAx mEP dE dDAY UNIP21 1720320 5539 2863 963 0 0 1564 1 512 16.5 782.5 9 4 158.56050 Old Order = TIME Before re-ordering by FREQ, with MMAX= 2863 CLAZZ: NTRY = 2; CLZ = 8.0; JM, JMAX = 52 11; Fraction sumITC>20/MMAX = 0.956 DSND organized 2738 total echoes, or 95.6%; in 11 traces; of which DSND selected 2738 useful echoes, or 95.6%; in 11 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 7 347 2031 2836 0.00 0.00 -4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -324 9 28 50 -13 58 51 5 -2 5 0 0 88 15 0 0 6 196 886 2131 0.00 0.00 -3.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -138 2 0 17 -3 16 45 5 -1 8 0 0 89 15 0 0 10 20 2474 2527 0.00 0.00 4.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 488 18 35 42 -9 41 43 2 -6 10 0 0 118 14 0 0 9 29 2386 2531 0.00 0.00 4.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 439 11 -47 48 17 42 44 4 -3 7 0 0 110 13 0 0 8 155 2054 2548 0.00 0.00 4.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 369 10 7 61 -1 36 48 4 -1 6 0 0 73 15 0 0 1 27 1 27 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 116 1 -6 14 17 11 38 2 6 14 0 0 128 12 0 0 2 643 42 1469 0.00 0.00 2.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 130 3 -2 18 1 20 47 4 -2 11 0 0 64 16 0 0 5 292 579 2523 0.00 0.00 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 570 9 62 86 2 67 40 3 -1 24 0 0 101 14 0 0 4 178 482 1773 0.00 0.00 3.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 411 6 80 112 21 56 39 3 22 54 0 0 116 13 0 0 3 823 202 2484 0.00 0.00 3.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 276 7 13 40 -10 43 48 6 -2 10 0 0 75 16 0 0 11 28 2776 2852 0.00 0.00 -5.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 -440 15 -8 17 30 57 47 4 -5 4 0 0 97 14 0 0 POL rejected 0 multiple- & other traces: NIX ----- Precision Extrapolation to Penetrations with Error Estimates ---- j FSTj FETj RSTj RETj DSTj DETj 1 1.3760 1.4148 116.10 117.80 -3.0885 23.5792 2 1.9695 3.2987 138.74 129.77******** 49.9100 3 2.4491 4.3551 248.30 351.82-20.2550407.4730 4 2.8485 3.5281 381.35 445.17116.4189 92.8186 5 2.9517 4.2517 524.73 679.10147.1563 48.7189 6 -3.0591 -4.1039 -155.25 -129.89******** 5.7187 7 -4.1218 -5.2084 -293.50 -387.33 40.4598 -8.9620 8 4.1650 4.4134 341.63 404.97187.1428241.3210 9 4.3518 4.3825 443.00 436.56881.9128-54.0775 10 4.3883 4.4329 490.53 480.34 NaN 46.4456 11 -5.2098 -5.2763 -439.39 -445.00717.8116******** JOIN traces Je to Js: Abolish Je -Je Js LWe LWs FETe FSTs RETe RETs DETe DSTs ITRe ITRs NO Trace Consolidations; JMAX= 11 -------------------------------------- Break E/Es at cusp --------------- j is ie fis fie JBWX TBWX TBFR TBWj ixR FxR HxR 1 1 27 1.3402 1.4582 1 0.0017 0.0017 0.0099 2 42 1469 1.8781 3.3901 2 0.8529 0.8529 0.3408 2 1 1.3402 153.42 BreakE cusp: 2 2.0639 136.82 NIX with -55, new Es trace #12 from old # 2 TBWij: Trace Relative Bandwidths. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BW vs. minmaxF Upper: j > i: Overlap BW relative to i Lower: j < i: Overlap BW relative to j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.49 0.36 0.68 0 0 0.10 0 0 0 0.45 4 0 0 1.00 0.17 0.85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.66 5 0 0 1.00 0.44 0.33 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0.27 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.28 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0.77 0 0.35 0 0 0.06 0.12 0.10 0 0 9 0 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.01 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.56 0 0.01 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 12 0 0 0.70 0.37 0.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.31 TBWij: Trace Overlap BinCounts. Simple ordering (No O/X pairs) Column j: Row i: i=j: BC rel. to Total SITR= 2738.0 Upper: j > i: Olap BC i rel. to i+j Lower: j < i: Olap BC j rel. to i+j Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.30 0.68 0.69 0 0 0.34 0 0 0 0.45 4 0 0 0.32 0.07 0.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.45 5 0 0 0.31 0.63 0.11 0 0 0.17 0 0 0 0.46 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.13 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0.66 0 0.83 0 0 0.06 0.26 0.10 0 0 9 0 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0.74 0.01 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.90 0 0.01 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 12 0 0 0.55 0.55 0.54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.21 PROXT: Trace Start/End Proximities. Simple ordering; (No O/X pairs). Row i. Column j. i=j: Naturally Vacant. PROXT only if > 5 (~20% rel(F + R)). i < j (Upper): jStart, iEnd i > j (Lower): jEnd, iStart Row i, Col: j=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 14 0 9 10 0 10 10 5 8 0 11 8 0 12 26 0 NOMULTS: compare traces MUL k1 k2 RTR1 RTR2 DMUL 2 3 5 275.802 570.396 0.033 Test k2 as mul*k1. Q21 = REL(mul*R1,R2). CJG sums +- in bins, depending if Q21<.1 NOMULT k1 IT1 FST1 FET1 RTR1 k2 IT2 FST2 FET2 RTR2 CJG R1M R2M Q21 NIX -mul NB -k2 A12M 3 823 2.4 4.4 275.8 5 292 3.0 4.3 570.4 23.0 276.5 553.3 1.000 -200 -2 16 -5 NOMULT kills jj for proximity to k2 NOMULT k2 ITRk2 FSTk2 FETk2 RTRk2 jj ITRjj FSTjj FETjj RTRjj NIX mul Prox 5 292 3.0 4.3 570.4 9 29 4.4 4.4 438.7 -111 2 Prox 5 292 3.0 4.3 570.4 10 20 4.4 4.4 487.6 -111 2 2 12 3 128.165 275.802 0.073 NOMULT truncates trace k2= 3 at f = 3.48; de-Class NE2= 320 echoes. Truncation Criteria: CJG = 16.50 NB = 12 CJG+1.2 > NB? 3 12 3 128.165 290.352 0.279 3 12 4 128.165 411.168 0.067 4 12 4 128.165 411.168 0.220 PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES -6 196-3.059-4.104-137.9 -7 347-4.122-5.208-323.7 0.018 6 196-3.059-4.104-137.9 7 347-4.122-5.208-323.7 0.018 -4.11 JNZO: Is j z//o? RD=Rz/Ro~.94; build TO; if>8 make new jz: JNZO j ISTj IETj ITRj FSTj FETj RTRj YRTj YRTz RD Qoz CJG TO NB jz ISTz IETz ITRz FSTz FETz RTRz Qjzo 3 1208 2484 503 3.2 4.4 290.35 -1.43 -0.71 0.85 2.18 -10.00 -31.62 10 Qjzo 4 482 1773 178 2.8 3.5 411.17 -3.75 -1.91 0.85 1.21 -4.50 -9.00 4 Qjzo 5 579 2523 292 3.0 4.3 570.40 -10.62 18.40 0.90 1.83 0.50 1.73 12 Qjzo 12 113 1469 573 2.1 3.3 128.16 0.02 0.81 1.01 0.37 2.00 6.93 12 O/X conjugates? Yes, if TO>1 (=CJG*sqrtNB); (CJG tests slopes, RPRs); and best conjugacy by BTCJ JOKO io ITo FSTo FETo RTRo jx ITx FSTx FETx RTRx BWxo YRTo RD Qox TO NB i/j Qiojx 3 503 3.2 4.4 290.4 6 196 -3.1 -4.1-137.9 1.020 0.23 -2.10 17.85 -1.41 2 3 Qiojx 3 503 3.2 4.4 290.4 7 347 -4.1 -5.2-323.7 1.373 0.23 -0.92 0.38206.38 22 3 Aiojx 3 3.2 296.7 7 4.4-324.0 1.373 0.23 -0.92 0.38206.38 22 -3 AZOXo: [o 3x 7] TOz,o,x= 0.00 619.13 619.13 AZOXx: [x 7o 3] TOz,o,x= 0.00 619.13 619.13 Qiojx 3 503 3.2 4.4 290.4 11 28 -5.2 -5.3-439.9 1.015 0.23 -0.79 1.62 -2.12 2 3 Qiojx 4 178 2.8 3.5 411.2 6 196 -3.1 -4.1-137.9 1.184 0.31 -3.09 34.82-11.31 8 4 Qiojx 4 178 2.8 3.5 411.2 7 347 -4.1 -5.2-323.7 1.172 0.31 -1.47 8.84 -7.07 8 4 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -7.071 7 x 4 o 3.225 3.528 3 o 7 3.2 4.4 0.0 619.1 619.1 2 Qiojx 12 573 2.1 3.3 128.2 6 196 -3.1 -4.1-137.9 1.558 0.26 -0.93 1.82 4.69 22 12 Aiojx 12 2.1 126.9 6 3.3-136.1 1.558 0.26 -0.93 1.82 4.69 22 -12 AZOXo: [o12x 6] TOz,o,x= 0.00 14.07 14.07 AZOXx: [x 6o12] TOz,o,x= 0.00 14.07 14.07 Qiojx 8 155 4.2 4.4 368.7 7 347 -4.1 -5.2-323.7 1.082 0.26 -0.98 1.58 9.80 6 8 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n 9.798 7 x 8 o 4.165 4.336 3 o 7 3.2 4.4 0.0 619.1 619.1 2 Qiojx 12 573 2.1 3.3 128.2 7 347 -4.1 -5.2-323.7 1.061 0.26 -0.44 6.01 -2.60 3 12 BTCJ D J CJ L CL FsP FeP M2 C2 k Fs2 Fe2 DRZ_1 DRO_2 DRX_3 n -2.598 7 x 12 o 3.225 3.299 3 o 7 3.2 4.4 0.0 619.1 619.1 2 Qiojx 8 155 4.2 4.4 368.7 11 28 -5.2 -5.3-439.9 1.031 0.26 -0.91 0.85 10.39 3 8 Aiojx 8 4.3 404.0 11 4.5-442.9 1.031 0.26 -0.91 0.85 10.39 3 -8 AZOXo: [o 8x11] TOz,o,x= 0.00 31.18 31.18 AZOXx: [x11o 8] TOz,o,x= 0.00 31.18 31.18 AZOX Table j cjjcjjcjjcjj etc. 1 2 3 o 3x 7 4 5 6 x 6o12 7 x 7o 3 8 o 8x11 9 10 11 x11o 8 12 o12x 6 Z, O, X Match Quality j DRZ DRO DRX 3 0.0 619.1 619.1 6 0.0 14.1 14.1 7 0.0 619.1 619.1 8 0.0 31.2 31.2 11 0.0 31.2 31.2 12 0.0 14.1 14.1 ------------Reject Es and Some Other Traces------------------ j RSTj RETj RTRj RELs RELe NIXj 6 155.25 129.89 137.92 0.1182 0.0600 -44 12 139.91 129.77 128.16 0.0877 0.0124 -45 o ---------------------------------------- Determine E-layer penetrations ---------------- PNOX: E/F (= i/j) RTR transitions at FCES; i,j <0 maybe; >0 confirmed. i ITRi FSi FEi RTRi j ITRj FSj FEj RTRj DSE FCES QPNOX: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX -88.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 -88.000 0 JEFSE: FEZ JEZ FEO JEO FEX JEX FFZ JFZ FFO JFO FFX JFX 0.000 0 -88.000 0 88.000 0 88.000 0 3.194 3 -4.094 7 MANIX: FZE IEZ FOE IEO FXE IEX DOZ IFZ DOX IFO DXZ IFX 0.000 0 3.174 0 -4.114 0 3.174 0 0.042 3 2.515 7 sPENEE: IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X foE 0 0 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 3.1741 ---------------------------------------- Determine F-layer penetrations ---------------- Initial PENEF: zox MHz, Trace#s; Mag Conjugacy diffs/MHz; ok if < 0.1 PENEF: FZ1 JZ FO1 JO FX1 JX DOZ DOX DXZ 0.000 0 4.455 3 -5.299 7 9.000 0.006 9.000 --------Penetration Traces for SPREAD Consideration:--------- IEZ IFZ IEO IFO IEX IFX I2Z I2O I2X 0 0 0 3 0 7 0 3 7 FZE FOE FXE FZF2 FOF2 FXF2 0.000 3.174 -4.114 0.0 4.5 -5.3 jj j k MANjk FCj IGj DLF1 DLFN FCk IGk RTRk RAVk NPj sumCN MMC avFSP sMCN jj OK j 8 3 32 4.46 0 3.68 5.39 Admit k 8 3 3 32 4.36 0 Add k 8 3 3 -32 0 290.4 303.6 149 50 Admit k 8 3 8 0 4.41 0 Add k 8 3 8 0 0 368.7 371.7 79 89 Result j 8 3 32 97 9 4.02 89 jj OK j 9 7 32 5.30 19 4.38 6.41 Admit k 9 7 7 32 -5.21 19 Add k 9 7 7 -32 19-323.7-335.9 124 48 Result j 9 7 32 79 15 4.34 137 SPRD dDAY mFZE sFZE mFOE sFOE mFXE sFXE mFZ2 sFZ2 mFO2 sFO2 mFX2 sFX2 158.56050 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 4.455 0.1215 4.908 0.1315 RIQ.11111111 PENEE,F: 0.000 3.174 -4.114 0.000 4.455 -5.299 TRORD: Table of traces in Standard Order: # JFRj FST RST F*R MANj NIXj 1 1 1.38 116.10 159.8 0 0 2 2 1.97 138.74 273.2 16 0 3 12 2.09 139.91 292.4 0 -45 4 6 -3.06 -155.25 474.9 0 -44 5 3 3.21 271.98 872.6 32 0 6 4 2.85 381.35 1086.3 0 0 7 7 -4.12 -293.50 1209.8 32 0 8 8 4.17 341.63 1422.9 0 0 9 5 2.95 524.73 1548.9 0 -200 10 9 4.35 443.00 1927.8 0 -111 11 10 4.39 490.53 2152.6 0 -111 12 11 -5.21 -439.39 2289.1 0 0 123456789012 AZOX(JQ) = [o 3x 7] JQ, k, M, C = 3 4 3o JQ, k, M, C = 3 7 7x # JTJj FTSj TQVj 1 1 1.3760 1.943E-06 2 2 1.9695 1.793E-05 3 3 3.2084 1.000E+00 4 4 2.8485 2.483E-07 5 6 2.1134 -9.164E-01 6 7 3.2247 2.164E-02 7 8 4.1650 3.331E-03 8 11 4.3372 1.050E-06 9 12 2.0895 -5.381E+00 # JTJFP FTSJFPj TQVJFPj 1 1 1.3760 1.943E-06 2 2 1.9695 1.793E-05 3 12 2.0895 -5.381E+00 4 6 2.1134 -9.164E-01 5 4 2.8485 2.483E-07 6 3 3.2084 1.000E+00 7 7 3.2247 2.164E-02 8 8 4.1650 3.331E-03 9 11 4.3372 1.050E-06 Traces in TJF after re-ordered by JFP # JTJ FTSj FTEj TQVj MANj NIXj 1 1 1.3760 1.4148 1.943E-06 0 0 2 2 1.9695 2.0417 1.793E-05 16 0 3 12 2.0895 3.2987 -5.381E+00 0 -45 4 -6 2.1134 3.2062 -9.164E-01 0 -44 5 4 2.8485 3.5281 2.483E-07 0 0 6 3 3.2084 4.3551 1.000E+00 64 0 7 -7 3.2247 4.3358 2.164E-02 63 0 8 8 4.1650 4.4134 3.331E-03 0 0 9 -11 4.3372 4.4049 1.050E-06 0 0 Selected Traces in Sequence: jk # jk TQjk j 2 2 1.793E-05 j 6 3 1.000E+00 M 6 7 x k 8 8 3.331E-03 M 6 11 x -------TREVIEW: Prepare echo data for profile inversion------- TREVIEW: JMA O-modes, JFR-order, JMA= 5 O-traces: Traces in IAY(j) order: (F*R; O-only) IAYj: 1 2 3 4 8 IGj: 19 19 19 19 19 SrtFS 1.38 1.97 3.21 2.85 4.17 SrtFE 1.41 2.04 4.36 3.53 4.41 MANy= 0 62 64 0 61 NIXy= 0 0 0 0 0 ITRy= 27 70 503 178 155 XYTy= 18.6 25.4 24.2 83.0 7.4 RTRy= 116.4 146.3 290.4 411.2 368.7 BWjj=0.00990.01850.48870.17420.0637 TREVIEW: selected O-traces: JAC= 4 O-traces: JTP 1 2 3 8 MAN= 0 62 64 61 FST= 1.38 1.97 3.21 4.17 FET= 1.41 2.04 4.36 4.41 RST= 116.1 138.7 272.0 341.6 RET= 117.8 137.9 351.8 405.0 RTR= 116.4 146.3 290.4 368.7 XYT= 18.6 25.4 24.2 7.4 Daytime START = 90.00 TREVIEW ECHO-selection details: INN jj IGj JPOL JOLD FLO FSjj FEjj RSjj REjj FTOP foE FOPEAK 4 1 19 1 1 1.45 1.34 1.41 116.1 117.8 3.17 3.17 4.46 9 2 19 2 2 2.06 1.88 2.04 138.7 137.9 3.17 3.17 4.46 10 put FOE=FLO= 3.174 31 3 19 3 3 4.36 3.21 4.36 273.8 360.7 4.45 3.17 4.46 32 8 19 4 4 4.37 4.17 4.41 341.3 435.4 4.45 3.17 4.46 POLAN O-Trace Summary LTI SttFMHz EndFMHz 1 1.3514 1.9469 2 1.9469 3.1741 3 3.2108 4.3750 8 4.3750 4.4554 TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-06-07 1327UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 158.56050 RIQ.11111111 FB= 1.5990 MHz., DIP= 74.9330 START= 90.0 Km. AMODE= 0.0 VALLEY= -1.0 LIST= 0 POLAN95 Valley, Peak & error log output POLANA.f90 Last change: jet 2/04/04 11:44:00 PEAK 2.354 (±0.191) MHz, Height 126.2 (± 3.5) km. ScaleHt-10.6 (± 1.6) km SlabT 17.2 km 2 Iter. Valley 19.0 km wide, 0.07 MHz deep. devn 0.40 km. 7 terms fit 7 O + 0 X + 4. hx= 181.7 PEAK 4.435 (±0.110) MHz, Height 233.9 (± 3.4) km. ScaleHt 29.4 (± 5.4) km SlabT 65.7 km -------------------------------------- NeXtYZ v. 1.2 Full ----------------------- TLocal yDay sLat sFlux aKp 19.1164 158.7965 56.4486 120.0 2.0 foE fxE foF2 fxF2 mFOE mFXE mFO2 mFX2 3.1741 4.1137 4.4554 5.2991 0.0000 0.0000 4.4554 4.9084 ChapFm ChapZm ChapH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 cEmax cDhght cVwdth cEhght cEfreq cEFslpe ZProf(0,7) ZProf(0,8) 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prof(0,9) ZProf(0,10) NoEusd AvEpol AvEaz AvFpol AvFaz 0.0000 0.0000 509.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.6245 330.7600 ------------------------------------ end NeXtYZ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------VFITH results, in log(R) true range intervals------------------------ AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 13 HTOP FTOP Vx dVx Vy dVy Vz dVz RSQP VM dVM VB dVB IGU 107.6174 1.8398 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 114.4369 2.1092 -3.5 11.1 3.5 1.9 -2.8 10.8 0.377 2.6 3.3 -3.6 10.5 10 121.6885 2.2566 -3.5 11.1 3.5 1.9 -2.8 10.8 0.377 2.6 3.3 -3.6 10.5 10 129.3996 2.4133 -3.5 11.1 3.5 1.9 -2.8 10.8 0.377 2.6 3.3 -3.6 10.5 10 137.5994 2.5800 -3.5 11.1 3.5 1.9 -2.8 10.8 0.377 2.6 3.3 -3.6 10.5 10 146.3187 2.7573 -3.5 11.1 3.5 1.9 -2.8 10.8 0.377 2.6 3.3 -3.6 10.5 10 155.5906 2.9457 -3.5 11.1 3.5 1.9 -2.8 10.8 0.377 2.6 3.3 -3.6 10.5 10 165.4501 3.1462 -3.5 11.1 3.5 1.9 -2.8 10.8 0.377 2.6 3.3 -3.6 10.5 10 175.9342 3.3700 -19.9 15.7 -9.8 1.4 -2.8 14.9 0.678 -10.2 3.8 -0.1 14.5 10 187.0828 3.5682 -15.8 18.1 -20.2 2.1 -2.7 18.2 0.616 -20.2 5.6 2.6 17.4 23 198.9379 3.8937 -7.5 24.9 -29.5 1.7 -2.7 14.0 0.685 -29.2 4.4 5.0 13.4 50 211.5442 4.1805 -3.8 26.7 -27.4 1.8 -2.4 17.7 0.669 -27.1 5.4 4.8 16.9 69 224.9492 4.3971 0.0 24.9 -28.1 1.9 -3.5 19.8 0.679 -28.0 5.5 3.9 19.1 23 239.2037 4.4519 0.0 24.9 -28.1 1.9 -3.5 19.8 0.679 -28.0 5.5 3.9 19.1 23 Day FMXE HMXE SHE FMXF HMXF SHF bTEC tTEC aTEC rTEC FileName 158.56050 4.455 236.45 43.48 0.000 0.00 0.00 1.922 3.019 4.942 1.571 RIQ.11111111 Old Order = FREQ Before re-ordering by TIME, with MMAX= 2863 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 1 AvTra abandons VFIT, Trace = 11 -------------------------------VFITefVSB results, E, F region Averages ------------- dDAY NTR VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ VM dVM VB dVB INFILE 158.56050 999 -1.5 115.3 -18.3 10.6 -1.3 153.7 38.1 -18.0 42.9 3.5 148.0 RIQ.11111111 158.56050 998 13.6 22.0 -32.2 2.0 -7.0 11.8 75.7 -32.9 3.5 1.6 11.4 RIQ.11111111 ---------------------------------- Mesospheric VFITMimp ---------------------------------- dDAY jm VX dVX VY dVY VZ dVZ PQ HPN HPM HPX INFILE In VFITM, of 0, 0 are f<4.3 --------------Pulset PULSF Structure Functions-------------- j LG Dlag_1 Dlag_2 Dlag_3 Dlag_4 3*B SIA SIB CHI 1 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.45602 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 1 2 4 0.00001 0.00005 0.00015 0.00029 0.07361 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 2 3 4 0.00012 0.00104 0.00290 0.00568 0.08757 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 3 4 4 0.00028 0.00255 0.00707 0.01386 0.37523 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 4 7 4 0.00030 0.00268 0.00744 0.01459 0.07651 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 7 8 4 0.00012 0.00109 0.00302 0.00592 0.06950 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 8 11 4 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.12377 Noise loss of lags: LG in trace j: 0 11 DSND organized 2418 total echoes, or 84.5%; in 12 traces; of which DSND selected 1308 useful echoes, or 45.7%; in 7 traces; NME = 0; Q = 0.000 j sITR IST IET FST FET FTR FSE FEE PSE RST RET RTR RDT XTR XDT YTR YDT ATR ADT VTR VDT DST DET 10EPT 10EDT MAN JSP 1 27 1 27 1.38 1.41 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 116 118 116 1 -6 14 17 11 38 2 6 14 -3 24 128 12 0 0 2 70 42 112 1.97 2.04 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 139 138 146 1 -25 26 -2 23 48 2 -12 21 -144 55 58 15 62 0 3 503 1208 2484 3.21 4.36 3.79 0.00 4.46 0.00 272 352 290 7 22 29 -10 41 51 4 -2 5 -76 407 68 16 64 0 4 178 482 1773 2.85 3.53 3.11 3.24 0.00 0.00 381 445 411 6 80 112 21 56 39 3 22 54 116 93 116 13 0 0 7 347 2031 2836 -4.12 -5.21 -4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 -294 -387 -324 9 28 50 -13 58 51 5 -2 5 40 -9 88 15 63 0 8 155 2054 2548 4.17 4.41 4.28 4.38 4.22 0.00 342 405 369 10 7 61 -1 36 48 4 -1 6 187 241 73 15 61 0 11 28 2776 2852 -5.21 -5.28 -5.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 -439 -445 -440 15 -8 17 30 57 47 4 -5 4 718 -245 97 14 62 0 POL rejected 5 multiple- & other traces: NIX 12 573 113 1469 2.09 3.30 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 140 130 128 4 2 16 0 23 46 4 -1 9 -6 50 65 16 -45 0 6 196 886 2131 -3.06 -4.10 -3.57 -2.91 0.00 0.00 -155 -130 -138 2 0 17 -3 16 45 5 -1 8 -182 6 89 15 -44 0 5 292 579 2523 2.95 4.25 3.51 3.12 0.00 0.00 525 679 570 9 62 86 2 67 40 3 -1 24 147 49 101 14 -200 0 9 29 2386 2531 4.35 4.38 4.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 443 437 439 11 -47 48 17 42 44 4 -3 7 882 -54 110 13 -111 0 10 20 2474 2527 4.39 4.43 4.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 491 480 488 18 35 42 -9 41 43 2 -6 10 0 46 118 14 -111 0 [ TOMSK UNIV. DYNASONDE 10-06-07 1327UT 90°E 8pBP4It0 158.56050 RIQ.11111111]. Done 2010/06/07 at 13:31:47.3; *********************** MMAX= 2863: DSND normal termination